Finalists are Jackman, Owen, Gruffudd, Paul, Firth
#331
Posted 27 July 2004 - 03:47 AM
#332
Posted 27 July 2004 - 03:48 AM
#333
Posted 27 July 2004 - 06:56 PM
RevolveR it is a fact that Roger was 46 when LALD was released and Pierce was 42 when Goldeneye was released--Adrian Paul at 45 is exactly in the same age range. Eon likes to start with semi-unknown 40 somethings--the last three Bonds have been of this type. Even Jackman has said he is too young for Bond saying he should be at least 40.Pussycat that is a good point. HOWEVER, Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan were both young guys when cast as Bond. Adrian Paul is what...? 82?? hahahhaI know how you feel MooMoo, but I honestly don't think producers call back an actor 7 times to audition if they aren't serious about casting him. Really... what would be the point? And I remember when some people were saying "Remington Steele as Bond? No way. Not tough enough. He's typecast as Remington Steele. He's just a television actor. No one will buy him as Bond." I'd be willing to bet a few people felt the same about The Saint and Heathcliff.
The age argument is weak as has been argued elsewhere--Roger was fine until Octuopussy at 56 and the issue with Pierce is not age it is money and creative differences. Pierce look-wise can easily do 2 more Bonds into his mid 50's. Paul has a youthful look for his age like those two and can also go to mid 50's like them giving him easily 4 Bonds to do at least.
So the issue comes down to if you think he is fit for Bond--like any candidate he has his supporters and distractors. I support him as did many who voted on his credibility as Bond in a previous poll in this site and he won hands-down a national poll as best Bond in Parade magazine. And Eon has seriously considered him before. But again we all have different opinions--Paul, Jackman, Owen, Brosnan and others have been ripped on this site. Makes things interesting
#334
Posted 27 July 2004 - 07:43 PM
As for the 83 year old comments, folks....LOL....well.....I don't think I'd be alone among the female fans if I remarked that he is ONE 83 yr old who could climb in my bedroom window anyday, with a license to kill or not!
In fact, forgive me but I have to say it....."There can be only one....83 yr old who looks like that! "
#335
Posted 27 July 2004 - 08:40 PM
I feel Bond sould be as close to age 40 when cast as possible. That aside, I don't think that Adrian Paul is suave enough to pull of 007. You just have to have a certain look, and he doesn't have it. But thats just my opinion. I'm a fan of Brosnan because he is able to convince the viewers that he really is Bond. Adrian Paul would be another Lazenby because he could not convince enough people that he was Bond.
#336
Posted 27 July 2004 - 08:40 PM
Well with the recent news, it seems this thread may soon be having a winner chosen.So one of those six actors will be officially announced as the next James Bond--Jackman, Owen, Firth, Gruffudd, Paul and Brosnan."
#337
Posted 27 July 2004 - 09:44 PM
Well we can of course diagree on who would do best as Bond. But a simple point of fact I have to point out that Paul is the farthest thing from looking old for his age. Quite the contrary.My mistake for not doing the research. Adrian Paul looks a lot older than he is...what can I say.
I feel Bond sould be as close to age 40 when cast as possible. That aside, I don't think that Adrian Paul is suave enough to pull of 007. You just have to have a certain look, and he doesn't have it. But thats just my opinion. I'm a fan of Brosnan because he is able to convince the viewers that he really is Bond. Adrian Paul would be another Lazenby because he could not convince enough people that he was Bond.
#338
Posted 27 July 2004 - 09:55 PM
www.adrianpaul.net
(Newswire)
sheryl
Attached Files
#339
Posted 28 July 2004 - 06:03 PM
#340
Posted 28 July 2004 - 06:14 PM
Think that may just be nothing more than a coincidence. TV Guide often focuses on such stars, it's not as if we haven't seen Jackman mentioned or something like that before.The TV guide for the upcoming week of August 1 just came out and its main article is on the "25 Greatest SCI-FI Legends". Adrian Paul as Duncan Macleod in Highlander came in an impressive #11 legend in the long history of TV. Not too shabby at all and a solid platform to jump to Bond--it certainly has given him a solid fan base to say the least. Nice little coincidence this came out virtually the same time as Pierce quitting.
#341
Posted 28 July 2004 - 06:24 PM
#342
Posted 28 July 2004 - 06:26 PM
#343
Posted 28 July 2004 - 06:39 PM
Now there's the style of recent news. Crazed and difficult to believe.I think John Edwards is going to get it. He's going to accept it tonight.
#344
Posted 28 July 2004 - 06:43 PM
#345
Posted 28 July 2004 - 07:07 PM
As I've said before, this Bond news can do some pretty weird stuff.Ok, here's more....Ted Kennedy to be UN Ambassador if Kerry wins Presidency
#346
Posted 28 July 2004 - 07:55 PM
#347
Posted 28 July 2004 - 07:56 PM
Well I'm not going to get into bashing, too much of that. I do think that some of the members on here favor him and the show though.It's more interesting that TV Guide named Adrian Paul's Highlander an all-time SCI-FI TV legend--impressive.
#348
Posted 28 July 2004 - 07:59 PM
#349
Posted 28 July 2004 - 08:01 PM
I noticed that also in some of the pictures, especially when his hair is back. Just not a very Bondish suave look.My mistake for not doing the research. Adrian Paul looks a lot older than he is...what can I say.
#350
Posted 28 July 2004 - 08:07 PM
Edited by Seannery, 28 July 2004 - 09:01 PM.
#351
Posted 28 July 2004 - 08:15 PM
#352
Posted 28 July 2004 - 08:46 PM
Maybe we can end on agreement on this statement--The powers that be will decide if he is young looking enough to be Bond. That is the view that counts. Not our subjective ones.
Edited by Seannery, 28 July 2004 - 09:58 PM.
#353
Posted 28 July 2004 - 08:48 PM
Of course, that's a given.Maybe we can end on agreement on this statement--The powers that be will decide if he is young looking enough to be Bond. That is the view that counts. Not our subjective ones.
#354
Posted 28 July 2004 - 08:58 PM
I say this because the movies aren't attracting enough of the younger market.
If you compare now to the best Moore days and compare Die Another Day with Goldeneye, you can see the producers have rested on their laurals and aren't attracting enough of the younger audience.
Ticket sales of DAD were lower than Goldeneye, so no more younger viewers are being attracted than older ones getting bored (or dying).
All the big rival franchises, Austin Powers, Lord of the Rings, Spiderman etc have a core of young viewers. Bond needs to become cooler, with a less aloof actor to attract that audience and it will take far more money and sell far more video games and merchandise.
Orlando Bloom is one actor to draw a younger demographic because of his youth and association with some very big franchises, Hugh Jackman is another because of the X-men success and Van Helsing. Clive Owen would be an utter disaster in box office terms. Eric Bana, somewhere between.
#355
Posted 28 July 2004 - 08:59 PM
Just a theory. One that came about because his compliments about Pierce seemed a bit overdone and struck me as though something didn't smell right.
#356
Posted 28 July 2004 - 09:11 PM
I suppose it is possible Owen has Bond bagged and that's why he is cagey and nice about Brosnan. I just hope not! But maybe he would exceed my expectations.
#357
Posted 28 July 2004 - 09:45 PM
#358
Posted 29 July 2004 - 01:03 AM
If they choose him and pass on Adrian Paul for the role, something is very wrong!
And while we're talking...I really like Hugh Grant and enjoy watching him, but there is NO WAY he is Bond.
#359
Posted 29 July 2004 - 01:35 AM
Hugh Grant is a fine actor and person. He would not make a fine Bond, he'd make a terrible one. Could never even imagine a seriously taken Bond film with him in it.I hate to be negative, and I try not to bash any actor mentioned because everyone has favorites but I have to say Bana does not say "Bond" to me.
If they choose him and pass on Adrian Paul for the role, something is very wrong!
And while we're talking...I really like Hugh Grant and enjoy watching him, but there is NO WAY he is Bond.
#360
Posted 29 July 2004 - 10:27 AM
I hope that theory of yours is correct. I really want to see Owen as Bond.Another thought came to me recently that maybe Clive Owen has been protesting too much about having no contact or interest in Bond. Perhaps he is all signed up but doesn't want to seem like he was pushing popular Pierce out. Hence his effusive compliments about the success that Pierce brought to Bond and his strong praise on how well Pierce performed Bond. Now having said all that and Pierce perhaps given a graceful way out Clive can then come in without seemingly pushing Pierce out the door.
Just a theory. One that came about because his compliments about Pierce seemed a bit overdone and struck me as though something didn't smell right.