Originally posted by Blue Eyes
Spoke to a friend who loved the first and second Matrix films. He hated the third.
He described it as having too much CGI, and an attempt to remake a Superman film in the 21st Century.
Could have been me.
I saw it yesterday night and I was one of those people who hated it. There were two many questions left open in the end. And there was some kind of philosophy in the first two movies, in this one there wasn't. The architect, who explained in "Reloaded" how the Matrix worked was said not to know about what he speaks by the oracle in "Revolutions". This means the whole plot of "Reloaded" was kind of crap. Oh, wonderful. Nice to get to know that.
The 2nd one was far better though. And I still think that no sequel was ever needed.
Oh and yeah, where the hell were the special effects Matrix is famous for? Couldn't spot them in "Revolutions".
Another oh - why did Trinity need so long to die?
As for Rory
- We know that your taste is strange. You love the classic Bonds and you're an absolute Die Another Day fanatic. Now that's bizarre, isn't it? 