Nothing, the title is a quoted joke.Originally posted by DLibrasnow
My question for those that insist R exists is this. Q stands for Quartermaster, what does R stand for??
No one. R was only in The World is not Enough.Also,.....who plays R in DAD?
Posted 18 January 2003 - 12:03 AM
Nothing, the title is a quoted joke.Originally posted by DLibrasnow
My question for those that insist R exists is this. Q stands for Quartermaster, what does R stand for??
No one. R was only in The World is not Enough.Also,.....who plays R in DAD?
Posted 18 January 2003 - 03:48 AM
Posted 18 January 2003 - 06:38 AM
Blue Eyes quoted me because I was replying to a post by Blofelds Cat. If you go back in this thread you will see that the subject got skewered into this frightening alternate reality a while back.
Posted 18 January 2003 - 08:21 AM
LOL!! DL, you have made my day. I trust you don't believe this.Originally posted by DLibrasnow
Believe it or not Blofelds Cat, but I have received Private Messages from people who insist that R is the characters position title. That R is the name given to the second in command of Q branch throughout the 007 series.
Posted 18 January 2003 - 02:48 PM
Posted 21 January 2003 - 05:14 PM
Posted 21 January 2003 - 06:36 PM
Posted 21 January 2003 - 07:53 PM
Originally posted by al
Benson claims that Major Boothroyd doesn't retire, and despite who portrays Q/Boothroyd in the movies, Boothroyd is the character that is refered to in any movie as 'Q'.
Posted 21 January 2003 - 09:05 PM
Benson claims that Major Boothroyd doesn't retire, and despite who portrays Q/Boothroyd in the movies, Boothroyd is the character that is refered to in any movie as 'Q'.
Posted 21 January 2003 - 10:24 PM
Originally posted by Blue Eyes
As for Bond referring to him as the records keeper, the jokes really simple. Re-watch the scene.
Posted 21 January 2003 - 10:32 PM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 12:13 AM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 12:36 AM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 12:58 AM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 04:46 PM
Originally posted by Blofeld's Cat
[B][FONT=century gothic]It's been generally considered that Brown was playing the same character (Sir Miles) as Bernard Lee.
Posted 22 January 2003 - 05:42 PM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 05:47 PM
Originally posted by DLibrasnow
Well then Benson is a moron! How does he explain that Desmond and Cleese appeared on screen together in TWINE.
In TSWLM, Desmond is referred to on screen as Maj. Boothroyd, since Cleese replaced Desmonds character then it is quite simply preposterous to refer to Cleese's character as Maj. Boothroyd. I have just lost all respect for Benson, he should be fired NOW!!!
Or is Benson suggesting that people belonging to Q branch must have the last name Boothroyd and have attained the rank of major?? What is that guy from Texas thinking?
Posted 22 January 2003 - 05:57 PM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 06:30 PM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 07:17 PM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 08:04 PM
Originally posted by Jamie007
Blue Eyes and DLibrasnow you have both completely missed the point. Jeez, how many times do we need to go over this. We know his damn name isnt really R and it was just a joke by Bond, we are just referring to him as R for want of a better term. If you give us his real name, we will call him that. For the purposes of this message board we are calling him R, just like they did in the films credits.
I think I'll scream if I see one more "R isnt really his name" post...
Jim
Posted 22 January 2003 - 08:16 PM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 08:25 PM
Posted 22 January 2003 - 09:06 PM
I cannot speak for Blue Eyes, but I am reacting to the belief of some CBNers that R is the actual official title of the Cleese character.
Posted 22 January 2003 - 10:55 PM
This has been debated before, and based on the total lack of tangible evidence to support this notion, Brown's M is considered as Sir Miles. However, many others do support your theory, DL.Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I TOTALLY disagree with you on this opinion. I believe Brown was playing Admiral Hargreaves who had been promoted into the position of M.
Posted 22 January 2003 - 11:07 PM
Posted 23 January 2003 - 12:39 AM
Posted 23 January 2003 - 05:59 AM
Posted 23 January 2003 - 06:24 AM
Posted 23 January 2003 - 07:12 AM