yes, despite all its faults the world is not enough is still better then dad:) i am glad there is a fairly big number of who feel this wayOriginally posted by SPECTRE No. 7
I really liked TWINE. When I first saw it I thought it was the BEST - now, I think not. And while parts of it are great (the entire pre-credits: the Bankers office, Moneypenny, the Boat Chase; Elektra as played by Sophie Marceau), some of it is truly awful. While the cinematography doesnt kill me, it is terrible and that scene where Elekta "cant breathe" is simply embarrassing - I would watch Stepmom if I wanted over-emoting. But it's still better than DAD.
Rant about The World Is Not Enough,
#31
Posted 09 August 2003 - 01:17 PM
#32
Posted 09 August 2003 - 06:16 PM
-Pre-Title
-The Casino
-The Missile Silo
-The Torture Chair
-David Arnold Score (gotta disagree with ya, I like the Arnold score and thought he used the Bond theme way too LITTLE!)
And then again, some bad stuff:
-Entire M Briefing sequence
-Any scene with Bond and Elektra alone
-The Parahawks and Caviar Factory sequences
-The bland finale
-Pierce Brosnan's lackluster performance
-Christmas Jones (obviously)
-Terribly boring villians, but such potential for Elektra
-Terribly boring henchmen
-Terrible dialogue in places
-Terrible Direction
But nonetheless, I would still take the film above LTK (the most dreadful Bond film, IMO) or AVTAK or TWMTGG.
#33
Posted 11 August 2003 - 07:00 PM
#34
Posted 11 August 2003 - 11:49 PM
well i must say that denise richards and her wet tshirt and her nice legs made up for any bad thing this film may have had in it, i think i stoped watching the film and just started watching her....dont hold me to that though;)Originally posted by Harmsway
DLibrasnow, I am by no means a TWINE fan, but I think you hate TWINE a little too much. As much as TWINE isn't all that great, it's not all that terrible either. It's just an "eh" Bond efforts. Got some good stuff:
-Pre-Title
-The Casino
-The Missile Silo
-The Torture Chair
-David Arnold Score (gotta disagree with ya, I like the Arnold score and thought he used the Bond theme way too LITTLE!)
And then again, some bad stuff:
-Entire M Briefing sequence
-Any scene with Bond and Elektra alone
-The Parahawks and Caviar Factory sequences
-The bland finale
-Pierce Brosnan's lackluster performance
-Christmas Jones (obviously)
-Terribly boring villians, but such potential for Elektra
-Terribly boring henchmen
-Terrible dialogue in places
-Terrible Direction
But nonetheless, I would still take the film above LTK (the most dreadful Bond film, IMO) or AVTAK or TWMTGG.
#35
Posted 12 August 2003 - 07:25 PM
#36
Posted 12 August 2003 - 07:31 PM
#37
Posted 12 August 2003 - 09:32 PM
#38
Posted 14 August 2003 - 05:10 PM
Originally posted by Genrewriter
A thing that might have hjelped would hbge if Electra were to escape initially. Bond could destroy the sub, kill Renard and then have a final confrontation with Electra, maybe a few months after the whole affair has been cleared up to show how personal the situation is for Bond..
I don't think there's any lack of fun in TWINE, but I agree that keeping Elektra alive until the very last minute would make the movie a lot better. The sub sequence is almost as boring as the ending of TSWLM.
#39
Posted 14 August 2003 - 05:33 PM
Would have been a better ending...
#40
Posted 14 August 2003 - 06:21 PM
Originally posted by Tarl_Cabot
LOL I'll never tire of hearing you rip TWINE.It wasn't as bad as DAD though.
Well, that's not too hard, Tarl.
With TWINE I came out of the theater feeling "ok, whatever, that was interesting, where are we going to eat now?"
After watching DAD (this was months after it had been released and I was back in the US, it was still showing at a small theater in my neighborhood), I came away feeling incredibly HOSTILE to the entire Hollywood film community and wanted to put out a contract on every single person involved with it, or at least threaten several lawsuits for severe injuries inflicted on my brain.
With GE, I came out of the theater quite impressed and certain that James Bond would continue in well-deserved glory. With TND, I came out of the theater disappointed but still going over some of the more memorable moments and figuring out the strengths and weaknesses. And wishing they'd cut down Carver's lines in half.
#41
Posted 14 August 2003 - 07:14 PM
#42
Posted 17 August 2003 - 04:21 AM
Yes I was horrified too.It had such a promising start and turned into garbage, practically shaming me for having such enthusiasm for this series.I felt like I didn't care if I ever saw a new Bond movie again. It was like being a priest who lost his faith in god...Bond 21 better rock the $#@*&! planet!
#43
Posted 17 August 2003 - 02:54 PM
#44
Posted 18 August 2003 - 07:09 AM
#45
Posted 18 August 2003 - 11:33 AM
Bond is a preposterous, fantasy figure and as such the attempts by the Brosnan crew to turn him into a touchy feely regular Joe are completely ill advised and just downright laughable. The two extremes don't gel and instead of evoking any sympathy all TWINE does is evoke my gag reflex.
#46
Posted 18 August 2003 - 02:12 PM
I'm the opposite - I find myself liking DAD more and more every time I watch it, while I found myself making the journey from mere indifference to outright hatred every time I watched TWINE. Just think of DAD as a modern-day Moonraker and you'll have a far more enjoyable experience.
#47
Posted 18 August 2003 - 02:22 PM
Originally posted by Dr.Carl Mortner
while I found myself making the journey from mere indifference to outright hatred every time I watched TWINE.
You mean you saw TWINE more than once Dr. Mortner? What are you a glutton for punishment?
#48
Posted 18 August 2003 - 04:53 PM
Originally posted by Dr.Carl Mortner
"After watching DAD (this was months after it had been released and I was back in the US, it was still showing at a small theater in my neighborhood), I came away feeling incredibly HOSTILE to the entire Hollywood film community and wanted to put out a contract on every single person involved with it, or at least threaten several lawsuits for severe injuries inflicted on my brain."
I'm the opposite - I find myself liking DAD more and more every time I watch it, while I found myself making the journey from mere indifference to outright hatred every time I watched TWINE. Just think of DAD as a modern-day Moonraker and you'll have a far more enjoyable experience.
Yeah but I've seen it twice now (the second time was under duress). Same response.
#49
Posted 18 August 2003 - 08:10 PM
#50
Posted 18 August 2003 - 11:32 PM
Originally posted by Turn
I probably should see it again, though, to see if my opinion's changed as I lean toward really disliking it.
You are a brave man Turn...
#51
Posted 18 August 2003 - 11:37 PM
#52
Posted 19 August 2003 - 02:23 AM
#53
Posted 19 August 2003 - 04:41 AM
I've seen TWINE more than I care to admit (a personal record of FOUR TIMES in the theatre and countless times on video) in an effort to like it. Hey -- it's Bond; we only get one of these things once every two or three years if we're lucky and, as usual, I wanted to enjoy it all I could.
It doesn't help that TWINE was a favorite of an ex-girlfriend. I know, I should be grateful that I had a girlfriend who enjoyed watching James Bond movies at all;P...
#54
Posted 19 August 2003 - 07:02 AM
Sorry all you Denise "Seriously I am a Nuclear physicist" Richards lovers out there (Bondfinessee007, Iceberg, Brendan007), I really respect your opinion, but your girl stank up the room and almost ruined a good film.
#55
Posted 07 September 2003 - 05:47 AM
I prefer that they cast actresses or, failing that, have the woman say nothing at all (and that would make for a very dull 2+ hours). It's always a shame when a terrible actor tries to act. It puts a damper on the whole movie, as it did to profound effect with TWINE.
So I'm afraid that I must emphatically disagree with BONDFINESSE, Brendan007, et al, in my feeling that Denise Richards was as harmful to TWINE as Sophie Marceau's embarassing overacting or Pierce Brosnan's half-assing it through most of the film.
#56
Posted 08 September 2003 - 09:29 PM
Originally posted by Pussfeller
So I'm afraid that I must emphatically disagree with BONDFINESSE, Brendan007, et al, in my feeling that Denise Richards was as harmful to TWINE as Sophie Marceau's embarassing overacting or Pierce Brosnan's half-assing it through most of the film.
FINALLY! Someone else thinks that Marceau's performance in TWINE was embarrassing. Thank you! The only reason some of those scenes between Pierce and Sophie work for me (and only minimally) is because of *Pierce*, not her.
#57
Posted 08 September 2003 - 10:48 PM
Sophie is much better than Pierce... well, that's not saying too much, but she did a great job.Originally posted by Jaelle
FINALLY! Someone else thinks that Marceau's performance in TWINE was embarrassing. Thank you! The only reason some of those scenes between Pierce and Sophie work for me (and only minimally) is because of *Pierce*, not her.
P.S.: Feliz dia da independ
#58
Posted 09 September 2003 - 12:29 PM
Sophie is much better than Pierce... well, that's not saying too much, but she did a great job.[/quote]
She's definitely better than Denise and Halle.
[quote]P.S.: Feliz dia da independ
#59
Posted 10 September 2003 - 04:19 AM
definitely NOT better than denise:)Originally posted by Jaelle
She's definitely better than Denise and Halle.
Igualmente!![]()
#60
Posted 10 September 2003 - 05:23 AM
I was all over her after 'Braveheart' and 'Lost and found' but she sucked in TWINE. Denise(so sexy and sassy in Wild things) sucked, the hot italian bird from 'Il Postino' had nothing to do...very dissapointing use of three very striking women.And Pierce was a girly man in that one("Elektra this is a game I can't afford to play" WTF??? I thought Bond had huevos and loved to gamble and take chances, confront adversaries)...They hired Michael Apted because he makes chick flicks that snooty critics like...TWINE will be on the lifetime chanel soon I have no doubt!

