I love how, in these interviews Michael Wilson has just given to Entertainment Weekly and EMPIRE, he is making the claim that the team has gone back to the Bond of Fleming....trying to get it right...trying to honor and respect Fleming's work and creation...and how do they do it? Give us an actor that looks absolutely NOTHING like the way Fleming described him, other than the fact that he's a man. And no, I"m not talking about Daniel Craig as Bond; I'm talking about Jeffrey Wright as Felix Leiter. His casting is a joke.
Why are you taking their words so literally? Do you honestly think that when say they are "going back to Fleming" that they mean exactly matching the physical descriptions of characters?
It's pretty obvious that they are talking about a more realistic
tone, and better written, deeper characters. They are trying to capture the tone and emotional depth and mood of Fleming. Of course, you can argue that they won't achieve any of that, but
that is what they are talking about.
"Faithful to Fleming" does not mean the colour of a supporting character's skin.