What type of timepiece should the next Bond wear?
#91
Posted 18 January 2005 - 05:30 PM
#92
Posted 19 January 2005 - 05:46 PM
Below is the watch worn by Jason Bourne:
Here is the watch I'm getting:
And here is about the nicest watch I've ever seen:
I've looked at omegas and they just seem plain to me, as do the rolex's. Any comments are appreciated.
I agree with what someone said before though ... a tag may not be the best watch for a bond character because of the bulkiness, but it is about the best looking sport watch I have seen (and hence worked well on the Jason Bourne character).
#93
Posted 19 January 2005 - 11:45 PM
http://www.chronomas..._Tag_Link_1.JPG
But, rj, get yourself the blue dialled model. It kicks! And Tags are pretty sturdy and trouble-free.
Vodka Martino
#94
Posted 12 February 2005 - 03:28 AM
http://people.timezo...ino/planet1.jpg
I also like the Seiko MarineMaster. Believe it or not, but it costs more than an Omega SMP.
http://www.watch-tan.../seiko/SBDX001/
I would still prefer Bond to wear a Rolex Submariner NO DATE. Model 14060M
#95
Posted 13 February 2005 - 01:08 AM
Just my 2c.
By the way, welcome aboard, f1.
Vodka Martino
#96
Posted 13 February 2005 - 10:03 AM
Is this thread still running? Hey f1, I think the Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean is one of the nicest watches I've seen in a long time. It would be great to see Bond wearing one in "Casino Royale". As for the Rolex Sub 14060M, it's not the first choice when I think of Rolex dive watches. I know the date bubble on the Submariner 16610 is a major sticking point for a lot of watch collectors. Which is why I think that if they decide to go back to Bond wearing a Rolex, they should give him a SeaDweller.
Just my 2c.
By the way, welcome aboard, f1.
Vodka Martino
For myself it came to three choices. Seiko Marine Master was my first choice. I thought it looked the best but it was by far the largest and with my skinny 6.25" wrist, it wouldn't look good. Then it was between the SeaDweller and Sub No Date and I went with the Sub No Date. The SD was a bit too bulky for me. I actually prefer watches with no date as I dislike changing the dates whenever there is a shorter month. I don't mind a watch with a date if it's a perpetual calendar that I don't have to ever change. I love the Blancpain Perpetual Calendar models but they are way out of my budget.
I'm not a big Omega fan as I really dislike Schumacher who is the ambassador for the speedmaster line and I never liked the blue faced SMP and I didn't like the current black face SMP models or they bracelets, but the black faced Planet Ocean is something I can see selling the 14060M for. It really looks good with the oyster style bracelet.
I'm kinda tired of the Rolex snobbery too. At work, more people have Rolex's than any other brand and I've been thinking about something different for awhile. I would love to get a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms 50th Anniversay Edition but it's way too expensive. I'd also like the upcoming JLC Aston Martin model but I'd need an Aston Martin to match it and I don't see that in my garage in the future. =\ Maybe if someone will buy a 10 million dollar home from me then I'll get the AMV8 and the JLC AM watch. =)
Edited by f1realtor, 13 February 2005 - 07:09 PM.
#97
Posted 14 February 2005 - 12:08 AM
As for Omega, they represent one of the best value for money brands you can get. But I can understand that their designs aren't everybody's cup of tea.
Vodka Martino
#98
Posted 14 February 2005 - 08:57 PM
Edited by f1realtor, 14 February 2005 - 09:14 PM.
#99
Posted 05 March 2005 - 12:44 AM
Next Bond should wear No-Date Sub again.
#100
Posted 05 March 2005 - 01:06 PM
Edited by AMWebby, 05 March 2005 - 01:06 PM.
#101
Posted 06 March 2005 - 02:51 AM
Attached Files
#102
Posted 08 March 2005 - 03:41 PM
#103
Posted 08 March 2005 - 08:01 PM
#105
Posted 08 March 2005 - 08:12 PM
#107
Posted 08 March 2005 - 08:40 PM
#108
Posted 08 March 2005 - 08:53 PM
#109
Posted 09 March 2005 - 02:36 AM
OLD Bond wears Rolex
CURRENT Bond wears Omega
YOUNG Bong wears SWATCH
#110
Posted 09 March 2005 - 02:39 AM
#111
Posted 09 March 2005 - 03:38 AM
If not, I'd go with a Rolex. Something expensive and reliable.
#112
Posted 09 March 2005 - 03:58 AM
#113
Posted 10 March 2005 - 09:57 AM
Interesting thread.
Next Bond should wear No-Date Sub again.
Draco, I gotta go with you on this one. I have already stated that Bond should wear a SeaDweller as opposed to the Submariner. However, if they are going back to a grittier and more realistic Bond film with 'Casino Royale', then a non-date Sub on the Bond Nato strap would fit the bill. Although, I would still prefer him in the new Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean. This watch is based on the Seamaster 300 from 1964.
Great photo of the Sub, by the way, Draco.
Vodka Martino
Attached Files
#114
Posted 10 March 2005 - 10:01 AM
VM
#115
Posted 12 March 2005 - 09:16 PM
For those who'd vote for the no-date Submariner due to its original 007 ties, how about going one better: the "James Bond" Submariner? This is what Rolex collectors (yeah, expensive hobby to say the least!) have dubbed the early versions without the crown guards. It'd be kind of a nice touch...even though you'd need a good close-up (a-la "Goldfinger") to tell.
Edited by Donovan, 12 March 2005 - 09:16 PM.
#116
Posted 13 March 2005 - 12:13 AM
Edited by Lady Rose, 13 March 2005 - 12:14 AM.
#117
Posted 13 March 2005 - 01:30 AM
#118
Posted 14 March 2005 - 11:43 AM
Just my 2c.
Vodka Martino
#119
Posted 14 March 2005 - 11:52 AM
Omega_AquaTerra_Blk_Dial_.jpg 94.08KB 103 downloadsHey f1, how's this for a studio pic?
That looks like something James Bond might wear to me.
#120
Posted 14 March 2005 - 04:51 PM
Attached Files
Edited by f1realtor, 14 March 2005 - 04:56 PM.