Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Bond 25 & 26 a two parter?


109 replies to this topic

#61 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 30 October 2015 - 09:02 AM

I'd expect BOND 25 to be a sequel to SPECTRE, in the same way SPECTRE is to SKYFALL, but I see little to no chance of a proper two-parter. So much can change between movies that it would be tempting fate, and these all work best as adventures that can standalone.

#62 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 30 October 2015 - 09:10 AM

Agreed.  And I don´t think that a two-parter is necessary.

 

Right now, it seems to be most sensible to have BOND 25 carry on with the open strands of SPECTRE, finishing Craig´s tenure.



#63 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 30 October 2015 - 09:42 AM

I just feel there is so much that could be continued because of the things that happen in 'SPECTRE' to warrant them saying Bond 25 is a sequel to this, much like they said 'QOS' was to 'CR' picking up events.

 

It's the 'SSS' trilogy - 'Skyfall', 'SPECTRE' and then hopefully another beginning with S to really bring this journey to a close and some resolve for Craig's Bond, because things certainly aren't over I think in one way or another at the end of this film for certain people.



#64 Surrie

Surrie

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 756 posts
  • Location:Surrey Heath

Posted 30 October 2015 - 10:12 AM

I'm going to see SPECTRE again tonight so will probably be able to make a more informed opinion after that. But, after watching it the first time my instant reaction was that they would leave Craigs bond there. Even though there are few things that could benefit from being tied up completely in an additional film, I felt as though they rounded the finish of SPECTRE off in a way that was similar to Brosnan's era films. 



#65 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 30 October 2015 - 10:24 AM

If by "two parter" we mean back to back filming - its not going to happen, is it? Daniel Craig has made it clear he doesn't want to jump back into Bond right now - emphasis on the words "right now".

But a sequel to SPECTRE is entirely possible. It would round everything off in Craig's (presumed?) final movie. I have concerns about it which I'll detail below and I repeat for it to work it would depend on

Spoiler


#66 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 30 October 2015 - 10:24 AM

Surrie, enjoy it again! When you do, watch....

 

Spoiler


#67 Surrie

Surrie

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 756 posts
  • Location:Surrey Heath

Posted 30 October 2015 - 11:52 AM

Surrie, enjoy it again! When you do, watch....

 

Spoiler

 

I'll be sure to watch out for that! 



#68 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:22 PM

With the next film being Craig's last, it will almost certainly follow on from Spectre.

#69 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:34 PM

I think it has to.
Spoiler


#70 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:50 PM

The one stipulation I'd make is:
Spoiler


#71 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:53 PM

The one stipulation I'd make is:

Spoiler

Absolutely.

#72 Surrie

Surrie

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 756 posts
  • Location:Surrey Heath

Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:57 PM

 

The one stipulation I'd make is:

Spoiler

Absolutely.

 

Agreed.


Edited by Surrie, 30 October 2015 - 01:57 PM.


#73 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 30 October 2015 - 02:11 PM

If they waste an actor and character, then I'll lose faith in their direction altogether.



#74 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 30 October 2015 - 02:15 PM

I absolutely agree with the above about the next villain, regarding casting. Whether it will happen remains to be seen. Call my a cynic ("A cynic is what an idealist calls a realist" - copyright, Sir Humphrey Appleby, Yes Minister) but;

 

Spoiler



#75 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 30 October 2015 - 04:43 PM

I'm reasonably sure that Waltz is already contracted for another one.

#76 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 30 October 2015 - 08:01 PM

I'm reasonably sure that Waltz is already contracted for another one.

That would be sweet.

#77 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 31 October 2015 - 08:30 AM

It would not make sense to re-cast, IMO.  I only wonder how they will deal with... his looks.

 

Maybe a slight cosmetic altering?



#78 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 31 October 2015 - 09:07 AM

It would not make sense to re-cast, IMO.  I only wonder how they will deal with... his looks.
 
Maybe a slight cosmetic altering?


Spoiler


#79 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 31 October 2015 - 10:47 AM

 

It would not make sense to re-cast, IMO.  I only wonder how they will deal with... his looks.
 
Maybe a slight cosmetic altering?


Spoiler

 

 

I would be very surprised if EON had 

Spoiler
.



#80 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 31 October 2015 - 02:19 PM

Something occurred to me just now about Bond 25 if we go the "Garden of Death" route;
Spoiler


#81 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 31 October 2015 - 03:45 PM

Something occurred to me just now about Bond 25 if we go the "Garden of Death" route;

Spoiler

It would be a fitting finale for CraigBond. And it would also allow for
Spoiler


#82 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 31 October 2015 - 05:21 PM

Something occurred to me just now about Bond 25 if we go the "Garden of Death" route;

Spoiler

It would be a fitting finale for CraigBond. And it would also allow for
Spoiler

Assuming the next movie;
Spoiler


#83 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 31 October 2015 - 05:53 PM

Well, I have a treatment I sketched out on my free time, and it starts like this:

Spoiler


#84 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 01 November 2015 - 01:41 AM

Well, I have a treatment I sketched out on my free time, and it starts like this:

Spoiler


Good start, Harmsway.

Spoiler


#85 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 01 November 2015 - 09:18 AM

The question is: will another Bond film with the same Bond girl work?  Wouldn´t it be too much of a "romantic couple on the run"-story?

 

I could also imagine Bond returning to the service after parting ways with Madeleine and securing her (maybe with Felix´ help again) - because he rather wants to know he kept the woman he loves safe than risking to live with her and see her be killed.



#86 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 01 November 2015 - 09:31 AM

I haven't really considered it, mainly with all the possible allusions to OHMSS. But could they go the Trigger Mortis route? Bond has been living with Madeleine for some time, but he eventually tires of the 'domestic' life. The two become involved in another adventure, but mutually agree it's time to move on. Ideally, I've come to the conclusion I'd prefer Madeleine to live. There's other ways her and Bond can part. 



#87 solace

solace

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 284 posts
  • Location:North of England

Posted 01 November 2015 - 10:59 PM

OHMSS wasn't followed on correctly. The potential is there for a wedding with Bond and wife on route to honeymoon when newly escaped SPECTRE baddy (you know who) escapes shots and kills wife. The film is then the you only live twice reboot as per the Book.

Thoughts?



#88 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 02 November 2015 - 12:19 AM

I haven't really considered it, mainly with all the possible allusions to OHMSS. But could they go the Trigger Mortis route? Bond has been living with Madeleine for some time, but he eventually tires of the 'domestic' life. The two become involved in another adventure, but mutually agree it's time to move on. Ideally, I've come to the conclusion I'd prefer Madeleine to live. There's other ways her and Bond can part.


I agree.
Spoiler

The question is: will another Bond film with the same Bond girl work?  Wouldn´t it be too much of a "romantic couple on the run"-story?
 
I could also imagine Bond returning to the service after parting ways with Madeleine and securing her (maybe with Felix´ help again) - because he rather wants to know he kept the woman he loves safe than risking to live with her and see her be killed.


Spoiler


#89 solace

solace

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 284 posts
  • Location:North of England

Posted 02 November 2015 - 12:22 AM

maybe she dies but doesn't if you get my drift. She goes into witness protection aka Mission impossible type of setup



#90 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 02 November 2015 - 01:50 AM

Well, I have a treatment I sketched out on my free time, and it starts like this:

Spoiler

Good start, Harmsway.

Spoiler
I'd prefer it if
Spoiler