Bond 25 & 26 a two parter?
#61
Posted 30 October 2015 - 09:02 AM
#62
Posted 30 October 2015 - 09:10 AM
Agreed. And I don´t think that a two-parter is necessary.
Right now, it seems to be most sensible to have BOND 25 carry on with the open strands of SPECTRE, finishing Craig´s tenure.
#63
Posted 30 October 2015 - 09:42 AM
I just feel there is so much that could be continued because of the things that happen in 'SPECTRE' to warrant them saying Bond 25 is a sequel to this, much like they said 'QOS' was to 'CR' picking up events.
It's the 'SSS' trilogy - 'Skyfall', 'SPECTRE' and then hopefully another beginning with S to really bring this journey to a close and some resolve for Craig's Bond, because things certainly aren't over I think in one way or another at the end of this film for certain people.
#64
Posted 30 October 2015 - 10:12 AM
I'm going to see SPECTRE again tonight so will probably be able to make a more informed opinion after that. But, after watching it the first time my instant reaction was that they would leave Craigs bond there. Even though there are few things that could benefit from being tied up completely in an additional film, I felt as though they rounded the finish of SPECTRE off in a way that was similar to Brosnan's era films.
#65
Posted 30 October 2015 - 10:24 AM
But a sequel to SPECTRE is entirely possible. It would round everything off in Craig's (presumed?) final movie. I have concerns about it which I'll detail below and I repeat for it to work it would depend on
#66
Posted 30 October 2015 - 10:24 AM
Surrie, enjoy it again! When you do, watch....
#67
Posted 30 October 2015 - 11:52 AM
Surrie, enjoy it again! When you do, watch....
Spoiler
I'll be sure to watch out for that!
#68
Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:22 PM
#69
Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:34 PM
#70
Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:50 PM
#71
Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:53 PM
Absolutely.The one stipulation I'd make is:
Spoiler
#72
Posted 30 October 2015 - 01:57 PM
Absolutely.The one stipulation I'd make is:
Spoiler
Agreed.
Edited by Surrie, 30 October 2015 - 01:57 PM.
#73
Posted 30 October 2015 - 02:11 PM
If they waste an actor and character, then I'll lose faith in their direction altogether.
#74
Posted 30 October 2015 - 02:15 PM
I absolutely agree with the above about the next villain, regarding casting. Whether it will happen remains to be seen. Call my a cynic ("A cynic is what an idealist calls a realist" - copyright, Sir Humphrey Appleby, Yes Minister) but;
#75
Posted 30 October 2015 - 04:43 PM
#76
Posted 30 October 2015 - 08:01 PM
That would be sweet.I'm reasonably sure that Waltz is already contracted for another one.
#77
Posted 31 October 2015 - 08:30 AM
It would not make sense to re-cast, IMO. I only wonder how they will deal with... his looks.
Maybe a slight cosmetic altering?
#78
Posted 31 October 2015 - 09:07 AM
It would not make sense to re-cast, IMO. I only wonder how they will deal with... his looks.
Maybe a slight cosmetic altering?
#79
Posted 31 October 2015 - 10:47 AM
It would not make sense to re-cast, IMO. I only wonder how they will deal with... his looks.
Maybe a slight cosmetic altering?
Spoiler
I would be very surprised if EON had
#80
Posted 31 October 2015 - 02:19 PM
#81
Posted 31 October 2015 - 03:45 PM
It would be a fitting finale for CraigBond. And it would also allow forSomething occurred to me just now about Bond 25 if we go the "Garden of Death" route;
Spoiler
#82
Posted 31 October 2015 - 05:21 PM
It would be a fitting finale for CraigBond. And it would also allow forSomething occurred to me just now about Bond 25 if we go the "Garden of Death" route;
SpoilerSpoiler
Assuming the next movie;
#83
Posted 31 October 2015 - 05:53 PM
#84
Posted 01 November 2015 - 01:41 AM
Well, I have a treatment I sketched out on my free time, and it starts like this:
Spoiler
Good start, Harmsway.
#85
Posted 01 November 2015 - 09:18 AM
The question is: will another Bond film with the same Bond girl work? Wouldn´t it be too much of a "romantic couple on the run"-story?
I could also imagine Bond returning to the service after parting ways with Madeleine and securing her (maybe with Felix´ help again) - because he rather wants to know he kept the woman he loves safe than risking to live with her and see her be killed.
#86
Posted 01 November 2015 - 09:31 AM
I haven't really considered it, mainly with all the possible allusions to OHMSS. But could they go the Trigger Mortis route? Bond has been living with Madeleine for some time, but he eventually tires of the 'domestic' life. The two become involved in another adventure, but mutually agree it's time to move on. Ideally, I've come to the conclusion I'd prefer Madeleine to live. There's other ways her and Bond can part.
#87
Posted 01 November 2015 - 10:59 PM
OHMSS wasn't followed on correctly. The potential is there for a wedding with Bond and wife on route to honeymoon when newly escaped SPECTRE baddy (you know who) escapes shots and kills wife. The film is then the you only live twice reboot as per the Book.
Thoughts?
#88
Posted 02 November 2015 - 12:19 AM
I haven't really considered it, mainly with all the possible allusions to OHMSS. But could they go the Trigger Mortis route? Bond has been living with Madeleine for some time, but he eventually tires of the 'domestic' life. The two become involved in another adventure, but mutually agree it's time to move on. Ideally, I've come to the conclusion I'd prefer Madeleine to live. There's other ways her and Bond can part.
I agree.
The question is: will another Bond film with the same Bond girl work? Wouldn´t it be too much of a "romantic couple on the run"-story?
I could also imagine Bond returning to the service after parting ways with Madeleine and securing her (maybe with Felix´ help again) - because he rather wants to know he kept the woman he loves safe than risking to live with her and see her be killed.
#89
Posted 02 November 2015 - 12:22 AM
maybe she dies but doesn't if you get my drift. She goes into witness protection aka Mission impossible type of setup
#90
Posted 02 November 2015 - 01:50 AM
I'd prefer it ifGood start, Harmsway.Well, I have a treatment I sketched out on my free time, and it starts like this:
Spoiler
Spoiler