Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

OFFICIAL: Daniel Craig signed for Bond 24 and Bond 25.


67 replies to this topic

#61 bond_azoozbond

bond_azoozbond

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 383 posts
  • Location:Portland,OR

Posted 13 November 2012 - 05:28 AM

It is a possibility I guess, Craig finishing his tenure in the age of 54 with 8 films under his belt... Wouldn't mind that at all. If one looks at Craigs face one sees that he has ageless features.


Well I can see craig staying 10 years .. and toping Moore and yes I think craig face didnt change from CR to SF and maybe even in bond 24 !!

#62 seawolfnyy

seawolfnyy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4763 posts
  • Location:La Rioja

Posted 13 November 2012 - 06:08 AM

I disagree. While I think Craig is actively becoming the best Bond, I have noticed some aging since CR. He looks slightly older and seems to have lost a bit of muscle. I'd like to think that with the care that Craig gives to the role, he won't stay past his prime. Also, it would be nice to have an actor going in to the film knowing it will be his final one. Strangely, we have not had that yet.

#63 Double-0-Seven

Double-0-Seven

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2710 posts
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:30 PM

I think the muscle loss is intentional. I think it was in press for Quantum of Solace that he admitted he felt he had bulked up a little too much for Casino Royale and wanted to tone it down a bit. In press for The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo it's mentioned that they wanted him to lose weight because he had just come off of Cowboys & Aliens which is another role he had bulked up for. In other words, he puts in the effort to get into whatever shape a given role will require. As long as his caring mentality doesn't change, I'll gladly take him as Bond until he's in his fifties.

His face has aged since Casino Royale, but that's six years ago. As long as he continues to look believable in the role I don't have a problem with him sticking around. I'll gladly welcome it!

#64 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:36 PM

I'm always relatively surprised when I remember that Daniel Craig (after three Bond movies) is still younger than Roger Moore was in LIVE AND LET DIE. Clearly, the nature and physicality of the role has changed a lot overtime, but it does cheer me that two more Craig movies really hopefully will be the minimum.

#65 Iceskater101

Iceskater101

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2398 posts
  • Location:Midwest, MN

Posted 13 November 2012 - 04:59 PM

Yeah and James Bond isn't actually muscular, I mean I think he is hot and he doesn't need muscles.

#66 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 18 November 2012 - 07:18 AM

The Sunday Times apparently is reporting confirmation of Daniel Craig being signed up to BOND 24 and BOND 25 in a deal worth around £31 million.

#67 Stavro

Stavro

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 27 posts

Posted 18 November 2012 - 01:34 PM

The Sunday Times apparently is reporting confirmation of Daniel Craig being signed up to BOND 24 and BOND 25 in a deal worth around £31 million.

Now we know he won't be breaking that deal, not in his right mind anyway.

#68 S K Y F A L L

S K Y F A L L

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6889 posts
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 18 November 2012 - 04:42 PM

I think they should have done one more Brosnan film so that each era had 7 films since this is 007 were talking about and whats interesting about this rumored deal is that his 8th film would make up for Dalton and Brosnan`s 6 films and why not 8 films worked for Harry Potter.

You normally don't see Barbara dressed like that and 31 million... SHOW ME THE MONEY! :)