OFFICIAL: Daniel Craig signed for Bond 24 and Bond 25.
#31
Posted 07 September 2012 - 10:58 PM
#32
Posted 07 September 2012 - 11:16 PM
EDIT
Now that I think about it, it will probably be TGWPWF in early 2014 and if were lucky and EON doesn't disappoint me Bond24 at the end of 2014.
But if DC films both the sequels to TGWTDTT back to back that could mean a early 2015 release for Bond24 right?....
#33
Posted 08 September 2012 - 02:52 AM
#34
Posted 08 September 2012 - 05:14 AM
Three years between Skyfall and the start of fliming.
Retain Mendes and you'll retain all the people he's worked with on Skyfall.
And like LoTR and Hobbit film them back to back.
Release them a year and a half apart.
Have them tie together like CR and QoS, and have them finish off the Quantum storyline.
Edited by winstoninabox, 08 September 2012 - 05:15 AM.
#35
Posted 08 September 2012 - 07:26 AM
Even if they get another director (which would be a problem in itself) - the question is whether this subject matter is still interesting enough for the mass audience. Lisbeth Salander as a character has been the big draw for the first film. And obviously, she was not a big enough draw.
I have found new interest in the film. But I don´t think that two more movies with these characters are necessary.
#36
Posted 08 September 2012 - 08:15 AM
I have found new interest in the film. But I don´t think that two more movies with these characters are necessary.
I agree. While I enjoyed the first book, as it was a bit all over the place I thought it would make a better film. Fincher and Zaillian did a great job focusing it into one. And Craig is worth watching in anything. The second book I plodded through about 5 months ago, and have found no interest in finishing the third. I suppose If Fincher directs and / or Craig stars I'll be there. But I've no idea why the series became an international bestseller.
#37
Posted 08 September 2012 - 10:52 AM
Oh, ok, back to topic...
BLOODY BRILLIANT NEWS!! Finally! A new Bond we get the chance to develop and grow with in the role rather than have them pulled right from under our noses!
Great, great stuff!
#38
Posted 08 September 2012 - 11:49 AM
I have found new interest in the film. But I don´t think that two more movies with these characters are necessary.
I agree. While I enjoyed the first book, as it was a bit all over the place I thought it would make a better film. Fincher and Zaillian did a great job focusing it into one. And Craig is worth watching in anything. The second book I plodded through about 5 months ago, and have found no interest in finishing the third. I suppose If Fincher directs and / or Craig stars I'll be there. But I've no idea why the series became an international bestseller.
I'm baffled. I read all three books in ten days whilst on holiday in Mexico. Just couldn't put them down. Each to their own i guess. I hope Craig returns for TGWPWF and TGWKTHN, if they get made.
It's great that DC has committed to the Bond series, i guess that means he enjoys being Bond? Who wouldn't...
Edited by PPK_19, 08 September 2012 - 11:49 AM.
#39
Posted 08 September 2012 - 01:21 PM
#40
Posted 08 September 2012 - 01:41 PM
MI6 is saying Deadline got the news from them, according to a Tweet from HMSS Weblog. If true, then we're back to wondering about MI6's source. And yet another example of one site taking news from another site and saying it's "confirmed. "
True, but Empire ran the same story, about DC being around for 2 more films, quoting Deadline as their source and saying it's been officially confirmed. I'm pretty sure it's a solid source.
#41
Posted 08 September 2012 - 02:34 PM
#42
Posted 08 September 2012 - 03:41 PM
#43
Posted 08 September 2012 - 05:09 PM
#44
Posted 08 September 2012 - 05:10 PM
Dench is a great M, but I think 'Skyfall' will be her last, I just feel her character arc is running out of steam and could make way for a new M for Craig's established James Bond.
#45
Posted 08 September 2012 - 05:18 PM
I reckon Dame Judi was at her best in Pierce Brosnan's era - she worked with his style of Bond and, to give her a due, she pulled it off somewhat with Craig for 'Casino Royale'.
I disagree. I feel Dench was at her worst during the Brosnan era. Mainly due to awful awful writing. She was brilliant in GoldenEye, but, just like Brosnan, her characterisation changed with every Bond film.
GoldenEye - Hard Faced Bitch.
Tomorrow Never Dies - Funny little woman, who loves Bond.
The World Is Not Enough - Damsel in distress, who is a soppy motherly figure (Would've been fine with competent writers.)
Die Another Day - Hard faced bitch again, but with growing trust in Bond.
With Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, I think she's much much better written, and at the same time, given a chance to actually show her acting ability.
Edited by DamnCoffee, 09 September 2012 - 11:56 PM.
#46
Posted 08 September 2012 - 07:08 PM
#47
Posted 09 September 2012 - 04:11 AM
I think the reason M; Judi Dench works so much better in the Craig films is because they're playing her up as more of a motherly figure to Bond. In the Brosnan films they were trying to write M as a no-nonsense boss in the Bernard Lee style.
#48
Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:14 AM
#49
Posted 09 September 2012 - 01:20 PM
As Brozza said... "Point taken."
I do like the chemistry between Dench and Craig, I think it was just the constant battle about if 007 can be trusted or not that I was a little niffed at, I wanted M to work with Bond more rather than work out stopping him, and if he can be trusted at all, which seemed to be sorted in the finale of 'QOS'.
I just hope it doesn't sneak into 'Skyfall' and she has issues again. I am looking forward to seeing her back though, it's a face of familiarity and comfort with Dench in the Bond films.
#50
Posted 09 September 2012 - 05:21 PM
Deadline is the most well connected and most important news source in all of Hollywood. Niki Fink probably picked up the phone and called Babs personally. Now, they might have been tipped by the MI6 story (or by the same mystery source) and could have given them a nod. But, come on, MI6 is relentless in ripping off news from others and never credits so...screw 'em.MI6 is saying Deadline got the news from them, according to a Tweet from HMSS Weblog. If true, then we're back to wondering about MI6's source. And yet another example of one site taking news from another site and saying it's "confirmed. "
As to the news itself. Cool.
#51
Posted 09 September 2012 - 05:58 PM
#52
Posted 10 September 2012 - 03:56 AM
#53
Posted 10 September 2012 - 11:40 AM
I'm with you. We'll have had time to grow accustomed to him, to his style. And he'll have had time to make the character his. Brilliant news!BLOODY BRILLIANT NEWS!! Finally! A new Bond we get the chance to develop and grow with in the role rather than have them pulled right from under our noses!
I just hope, now that everything seems smoothly on track, that they'll abandon the "can I trust you?" plots we've had since DAD and deliver an old-school bondian Bond.
#54
Posted 10 September 2012 - 04:09 PM
Deadline is the most well connected and most important news source in all of Hollywood. Niki Fink probably picked up the phone and called Babs personally. Now, they might have been tipped by the MI6 story (or by the same mystery source) and could have given them a nod. But, come on, MI6 is relentless in ripping off news from others and never credits so...screw 'em.
MI6 is saying Deadline got the news from them, according to a Tweet from HMSS Weblog. If true, then we're back to wondering about MI6's source. And yet another example of one site taking news from another site and saying it's "confirmed. "
As to the news itself. Cool.
Exactly.
And this news first appeared in the edition of Esquire with Craig on the cover anyway – probably MI6's source was reading it there.
#55
Posted 16 October 2012 - 01:03 AM
Actually he is 44, he could do Bond 24, 25, 26 and 27.
#56
Posted 19 October 2012 - 03:02 PM
#57
Posted 21 October 2012 - 01:07 AM
#58
Posted 24 October 2012 - 06:57 PM
Maybe Craig will know his own "Diamonds Are Forever" or "Die Another Day", I mean about a last movie with humor and expensive gadgets, even with a science-fiction aspect....
I would tolerate that as long as Craig doesn't get his own A View To A Kill. I want the best movies possible but just don't take four years between them.
#59
Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:30 AM
#60
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:46 AM