![Posted Image](http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/7468/gq1v.th.jpg)
![Posted Image](http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/8420/gq2zi.th.jpg)
![Posted Image](http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/7369/gq3k.th.jpg)
![Posted Image](http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/2491/gq4y.th.jpg)
![Posted Image](http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/5676/gq5z.th.jpg)
![Posted Image](http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/323/gq6p.th.jpg)
![Posted Image](http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/2238/gq7o.th.jpg)
![Posted Image](http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/2496/gq8o.th.jpg)
Posted 02 December 2011 - 07:14 AM
Posted 03 December 2011 - 08:25 PM
I certainly disagree, I'd much rather have Craig in my shower.I would rather take a shower with Kim Kardashian than with Dan Craig.
![]()
Not impressed with DC's statement, easy target with no risk whatsoever.
Posted 04 December 2011 - 06:05 AM
Posted 04 December 2011 - 06:08 AM
I disagree as well, I want Dan in my shower.
Posted 04 December 2011 - 08:48 AM
Posted 04 December 2011 - 09:07 AM
Poll added
Posted 04 December 2011 - 12:46 PM
Poll added
Posted 04 December 2011 - 03:21 PM
Posted 04 December 2011 - 03:26 PM
Posted 04 December 2011 - 03:39 PM
Posted 04 December 2011 - 07:55 PM
Poll added
You are being your usual (by now) sarcastic self, which I find rather senseless, unnecessary really and a tiny bit childish, no?. Maybe we need a poll about who agrees or not.![]()
Who or what would you like him to have a go at next in his crusade to tell us his necessary thoughts on critical stuff? He's sooo right! C'mon Daniel, you MUST tell us. TELL US. We are nothing without your wisdom.
Posted 04 December 2011 - 08:03 PM
Poll added
You are being your usual (by now) sarcastic self, which I find rather senseless, unnecessary really and a tiny bit childish, no?.
Posted 04 December 2011 - 08:25 PM
Posted 04 December 2011 - 09:44 PM
Poll added
You are being your usual (by now) sarcastic self, which I find rather senseless, unnecessary really and a tiny bit childish, no?.
You need a man in your life, Fraulein.
Posted 04 December 2011 - 10:13 PM
Posted 07 December 2011 - 08:52 PM
Edited by Mharkin, 07 December 2011 - 08:54 PM.
Posted 08 December 2011 - 04:37 PM
Posted 08 December 2011 - 10:17 PM
Posted 08 December 2011 - 11:53 PM
His 007 is not the only thug, so is the actor that plays him.
Posted 09 December 2011 - 12:05 AM
He should apologize for his language, which is actually the offensive part. The way he talks shows the lack of class he has. His 007 is not the only thug, so is the actor that plays him.
Posted 09 December 2011 - 12:58 AM
Posted 09 December 2011 - 12:59 AM
He should apologize for his language, which is actually the offensive part. The way he talks shows the lack of class he has. His 007 is not the only thug, so is the actor that plays him.
Thug? Hmm. What about the actor who you've chosen as your avatar. You know, the guy who beat his wife? Where does that rank for you on the offensive scale? Is that classier than a man actually talking like a regular human being?
Posted 09 December 2011 - 08:45 AM
He should apologize for his language, which is actually the offensive part. The way he talks shows the lack of class he has. His 007 is not the only thug, so is the actor that plays him.
I prefer listening to Sir Roger Moore any day of the week.
Posted 09 December 2011 - 09:37 AM
He should apologize for his language, which is actually the offensive part. The way he talks shows the lack of class he has. His 007 is not the only thug, so is the actor that plays him.
I prefer listening to Sir Roger Moore any day of the week.
Then best do exactly that. Its fine, if you don't like the swearing but classifying a person by it, is rather poor. Maybe you should make an effort to actually READ, what he is saying and then you maybe find, he is far from being classless - au contraire..honesty alone these days is an act of class, don't you think? In a world, where most celebs/politicians etc choose their wording just to make them sound like the greatest chaps on earth. Is that what you call class? Refined words telling lies?
IMO, if a person runs their life by second guessing what others will think, say and do then it’s not much of a life if the possibility of being pilloried makes you shy away from doing what you think is right.
Interesting comments, too.
http://www.torontosu...s-craig-apology
http://www.thesuperf...-lawyer-12-2011
There is even a fb side asking to boycott them with already 56.000 votes. https://www.facebook...ycottRealityTV?
So maybe he did open Pandoras box and others will follow - finally woken up.
Posted 09 December 2011 - 10:01 AM
He should apologize for his language, which is actually the offensive part. The way he talks shows the lack of class he has. His 007 is not the only thug, so is the actor that plays him.
I prefer listening to Sir Roger Moore any day of the week.
Then best do exactly that. Its fine, if you don't like the swearing but classifying a person by it, is rather poor. Maybe you should make an effort to actually READ, what he is saying and then you maybe find, he is far from being classless - au contraire..honesty alone these days is an act of class, don't you think? In a world, where most celebs/politicians etc choose their wording just to make them sound like the greatest chaps on earth. Is that what you call class? Refined words telling lies?
IMO, if a person runs their life by second guessing what others will think, say and do then it’s not much of a life if the possibility of being pilloried makes you shy away from doing what you think is right.
Interesting comments, too.
http://www.torontosu...s-craig-apology
http://www.thesuperf...-lawyer-12-2011
There is even a fb side asking to boycott them with already 56.000 votes. https://www.facebook...ycottRealityTV?
So maybe he did open Pandoras box and others will follow - finally woken up.
But I don't think its the argument or the way Craig chooses toing articulate himself that's the issue.
Mutli-millionaire Craigy is takiing advantage of a MEDIA interview by slagging off the K's for their public exposure for $$$$s. While in the same interview, Craigy is telling everyone what a really private person he is who hates PUBLICITY!!!!
Don't you see a certainly ludicrous, hypocritical irony there?
And remember. Craig, und frau, are now no longer just professional thespians, for the love of the art, darling. Craig hawks watches and his missus hawks make up. All for a few sovs more.
Yes, the Ks are fairly pittiful. Just not sure DC has enough of the moral high ground on which to denounce them.
Posted 09 December 2011 - 11:44 AM
Me thinks he has based on the ground, that ALL of the interviews, including being brand ambassador for Omega etc is part of his job as Bond
Posted 09 December 2011 - 12:25 PM
Me thinks he has based on the ground, that ALL of the interviews, including being brand ambassador for Omega etc is part of his job as Bond
Hawking tie-in merchandise is not an explicit part of the Bond contract. Dalton was asked to do it and refused.
Brosnan did it and later said he wished he hadn't because it went completely overboard with TND.
Posted 09 December 2011 - 12:33 PM
Then best do exactly that. Its fine, if you don't like the swearing but classifying a person by it, is rather poor. Maybe you should make an effort to actually READ, what he is saying and then you maybe find, he is far from being classless - au contraire..honesty alone these days is an act of class, don't you think? In a world, where most celebs/politicians etc choose their wording just to make them sound like the greatest chaps on earth. Is that what you call class? Refined words telling lies?
Posted 09 December 2011 - 01:46 PM
Then best do exactly that. Its fine, if you don't like the swearing but classifying a person by it, is rather poor. Maybe you should make an effort to actually READ, what he is saying and then you maybe find, he is far from being classless - au contraire..honesty alone these days is an act of class, don't you think? In a world, where most celebs/politicians etc choose their wording just to make them sound like the greatest chaps on earth. Is that what you call class? Refined words telling lies?
He's an actor and, accordingly, trained to lie. Are you sure this fairly easy targeting of some hopeless cretins isn't simply another performance?