Henry Cavill is Superman
#31
Posted 31 January 2011 - 03:26 AM
#32
Posted 31 January 2011 - 04:16 AM
Brandon to me is Superman, he's got it all. But I will take a wait and see approach because though I may not agree with the choice I do love Superman.
#33
Posted 31 January 2011 - 04:51 AM
#34
Posted 31 January 2011 - 06:14 AM
#35
Posted 31 January 2011 - 06:59 AM
Henry Cavill as Superman? I'm a fan of his, but I don't see it.
#36
Posted 31 January 2011 - 01:24 PM
I know that, but Superman is supposed to be American; Batman could be any nationality, but Superman needs an American actor behind it... otherwise, he'd be fighting for "tea, crumpets, and a whole lot of bollocks, me love!".
Nah; Superman's an illegal immigrant! He even adopts a false name to be accepted as an American! Batman's far more American than he is!
Seriously though, I can see why some people would prefer a proper American to play him. I'm sure there'll be quite a few columns in the US press about all that, but it's all publicity, isn't it!
#37
Posted 31 January 2011 - 02:00 PM
I wasn't nuts about SR but I kind of would have liked to have seen where they would have gone with another film. Still, I guess they've got to be pretty ruthless about films that are costing in excess of $200million
I know - how about a boycott site! Those are always successful. www.cavillnotsuperman.com is probably available
I think you're still going to be telling varitations on that gag in your retirement home
#38
Posted 31 January 2011 - 03:10 PM
#39
Posted 31 January 2011 - 04:13 PM
Well seeing as America's most recent contribution to superheroism was to cast Seth Rogen as the Green Hornet, bring on the Brits.
Seth Rogen was a hell of a lot more interesting as the Green Hornet than Van Williams. As for your message to bring on the "Brits", at least bring on someone who can do a decent American accent - like Christian Bale.
#40
Posted 31 January 2011 - 07:33 PM
If anything, Routh will be to Superman what Dalton was to Bond: good actor, but in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I cannot agree with this assessment of both Routh as Superman and Dalton as Bond. Dalton was at the right place for the period he portrayed as Bond. Unfortunately, it took movie goers to appreciate what he was trying to do or realize that his tenure as Bond eventually ushered in the era of angst-ridden spies and other fictional heroes.
As for Routh, he simply had the bad luck to be in a movie, in which the director and writers couldn't decide whether it was a remake of 1978's "SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE" or a sequel to 1981's "SUPERMAN II". The script was at fault, not the actor. But the actor received most of the blame.
#41
Posted 31 January 2011 - 07:37 PM
As for Routh, he simply had the bad luck to be in a movie, in which the director and writers couldn't decide whether it was a remake of 1978's "SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE" or a sequel to 1981's "SUPERMAN II". The script was at fault, not the actor. But the actor received most of the blame.
I don't think I've seen anyone blame Routh for Returns' faults. He was generally received as a good Superman.
#42
Posted 31 January 2011 - 10:20 PM
And Brandon Routh is now George Lazenby.
Not really. OHMSS was a great Bond film. SR was a mess with some good parts here and there.
Too bad. I liked Routh as Supes. He was perfect. funny, Batman, Spiderman and now Superman are played by brits! No wonder our economy is in ruins...outsourcing!
#43
Posted 31 January 2011 - 11:54 PM
And Brandon Routh is now George Lazenby.
More like Timothy Dalton, as they both later played villains on Chuck
#44
Posted 02 February 2011 - 11:10 AM
What?
The all-American Superman... played by a Brit?
...
No. No thank you; think I'll stay away...
Oh, come on, Mr Blofeld, we've had to put up with Americans playing our British heroes.
A bit surprising but I'll bite being the hardcore DC guy I am I won't turn my nose up at the choice even if he's not American.
Brandon to me is Superman, he's got it all. But I will take a wait and see approach because though I may not agree with the choice I do love Superman.
Christopher Reeve is Superman and always will be.
"What about George Reeves?"
Shut up, Dad!
______________________
#45
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:02 PM
I have no particular interest in Superman, and based on the two films of his I've seen Snyder is only as good (Watchmen) or otherwise (300) as his source material.
Wait a minute. The director of the new Superman movie was the same guy who directed "300" and "WATCHMEN" . . . two movies I cannot stand? This doesn't look good.
#46
Posted 19 February 2011 - 08:20 PM
#47
Posted 27 February 2011 - 08:42 PM
#48
Posted 27 February 2011 - 10:11 PM
#49
Posted 09 March 2011 - 04:25 PM
#50
Posted 10 March 2011 - 10:21 PM
No one could ever replace Chris Reeve, which is why Superman Returns flopped.
Well one problem is they did the George Lazenby approach with SR. They got a Christopher Reeve clone who did not have quite the talent of Reeve, and had him imitate Reeve (much more than they had Laz copy Connery). They should have hired a talented actor and let them give their own spin on Superman instead of trying to capture what made the Reeve movies in 78 and 80 so popular.
#51
Posted 20 March 2011 - 02:52 PM
No one could ever replace Chris Reeve, which is why Superman Returns flopped. If they stick to the comics-Rebirth, Geoff John's Superman Origins and J Mike Straczynsky's Superman Earth One are great stories to pull from. Batman Begins tapped Year One and the Dark Knight tapped the Killing Joke. As a DC fan, I love Marvel as well, but the DC characters hold my attention a bit more. I hope Cavill is a great Superman, but lets get a great Lois, Lex, Perry and Jimmy to support him. I am optimistic this will be a good movie.
In what respect did the movie flop? I mean, it did make $400 million dollars at the box office, not to mention whatever it earned in the home media markets, which shows there was substantial interest in the property.
I *get* some of the disappointment with the film (as I have some of my criticisms), but I thought the film was more or less an excellent way to restart the series and to serve as a launching point for further films. I believe that was what was intended all along, and yet somehow, for some reason(s), WB got cold feet and decided to abandon the entire project for what appears to be a complete reboot of the series.
And I totally disagree with your assessment that we need a "great" Lois, Jimmy, Perry, and Lex. Lex and Lois as storylines have been done to death. Time to bring in a fresh set of villains and love interest, if any, for a while.
It flopped b/c you had talented actors doing the same roles as Reeve, Hackman & Kidder. It went to the $5 DVD bin quickly, and was a continuation of the Donner Films ( I include his good cut of Superman 2). It lost money in the US but did well in foreign markets, I get that. IMO you can't have a good Superman movie without Lex Luthor being a bad guy is some form, whether or not he is using another villain like Parasite or Metallo to do his dirty work. While at the Daily Planet Clark needs good interaction with Lois, Perry and Jimmy to help move the story along. Lois is and always has been the main love interest and always will be. Lana Lang has been done on SMallville, Lori Lemaris would be interesting but no average moviegoer knows Lori Lemaris (who is a mermaid btw for those not familiar with Superman Comics) so Lois needs to be the romantic interest, especially if this is going to be a film that is a reboot. If you have a non Lex villain (Braniac would be good, but Lex still has to have some way of controlling him), or a 'new' love interest you will alienate the hardcore fans and not really bring in anyone new to see a Superman they are unfamiliar with. Not that your ideas aren't bad, it would do better for a sequal.
#52
Posted 27 March 2011 - 06:53 PM
#53
Posted 27 March 2011 - 08:09 PM
#54
Posted 28 March 2011 - 06:15 AM
No one could ever replace Chris Reeve, which is why Superman Returns flopped.
"SUPERMAN RETURNS" flopped because Bryan Singer had spent too much money on its production. It earned a lot of money at the box office. But due to the film's cost, it wasn't enough for the studio to make a profit. That's the main reason why it "flopped". Mind you, the film had its problems, but moviegoers lining up at the box office to see it wasn't one of them.
Yes, Chris Reeve did a great job as Superman. So did George Reeves, Dean Cain and Tom Welling. As far as I'm concerned.
#55
Posted 30 March 2011 - 10:18 PM
This is great news!
Amy Adams is Lois Lane in Zack Snyder's 'Superman' Reboot
Just an FYI she appeared in a 1st or 2nd season episode of SMallville. She played a chunky gal who slimmed down when drinking kryptonite infused smoothies, and she went a bit cannibal. Her character dated Pete Ross.
I like the choice, as I had her, Kate Beckinsale and Jessica Biel as my top 3 choices for Lois Lane. In the John Byrne Superman reboot comic Man of Steel, he made Lois a redhead (closer to auburn hair color). Check it out, you can find it cheap in a local comic store or on Amazon.
#56
Posted 30 March 2011 - 11:09 PM
#57
Posted 11 April 2011 - 03:24 AM
#58
Posted 11 April 2011 - 06:20 AM
Michael Shannon is General Zod! I love this cast so far!
That's an inspired choice, though I was secretly hoping Michael Shannon would play Jaws in a future Bond film
#60
Posted 04 August 2011 - 02:50 PM
Well... still hoping that this one will turn out good.