CARTE BLANCHE
#1681
Posted 30 January 2011 - 05:31 PM
#1682
Posted 30 January 2011 - 06:31 PM
#1683
Posted 30 January 2011 - 06:35 PM
Attached Files
#1684
Posted 30 January 2011 - 06:39 PM
#1685
Posted 31 January 2011 - 02:47 PM
Why is it that 'photoshopping' is considered the byword for lazy or inept design?
The same reasons that Auto-Tune has similar connotations in music.
#1686
Posted 31 January 2011 - 04:39 PM
Is this as widely used as Photoshop in their respective circles? Are there any musicians here that can testify to this - I am not a musician or designer.
#1687
Posted 31 January 2011 - 05:49 PM
Ok. Have to admit I cannot comment as I have never heard of Auto-Tune.
Is this as widely used as Photoshop in their respective circles? Are there any musicians here that can testify to this - I am not a musician or designer.
The wikipedia article (not the best source, I know) is fairly helpful. Auto-Tune.
It is the artists (or "artists") using Photoshop/Auto-Tune that's the problem. You can do fabulous things with Photoshop (anything done by Mister Asterix, for example), but often times there is a certain amount of laziness behind some of it. "I could actually draw some great looking smoke (or whatever) on the computer or I could take a picture from a Google Image Search, run it through one or two filters, plop it on a background with the title and call it a day" or "I could actually have singing ability and hit this note, or I could just sing whatever note and have the computer fix it later."*
*I promise I am not a luddite.
#1688
Posted 31 January 2011 - 11:02 PM
But from what you say, the tool is capable of marvellous results. I didn't know the Mr * work was produced with such and so this would seem to bear out my (and our) statement that the tool is, for want of a better word, an industry standard.
That there are lazy things done with Photoshop does Not make it a given that hard and successful work is done with every other design tool out there. I am aware by persistently arguing this case that it could be questioned whether I am an agent for said product. I am not, I assure you. I am just sitting on a fence wondering how a sentence along the lines of, 'it's just Photoshopped' has become a translation for bad or lazy design.
To refer back to the book design, I am not sure the cover is a product of Photoshop or not. To my untrained eye it could just as easily be a photograph. And if it is a photograph, it shouldn't by virtue of that fact make it any more or less successful.
For the positive, I would say it is clean, uncluttered and somewhat stylish.
For the negative, I could say it is unoriginal and has been done to death.
Maybe I am just feeling sorry for Photoshop; unprotected, unloved and in need of a friend when design detractors are in search of a stinging put down. Perhaps I could say the Photoshop put down is as unoriginal as the design we are commenting upon.
*I promise, I am not trying to be a pain in the .
#1689
Posted 01 February 2011 - 07:15 PM
I respect the opinion of those who dislike the cover as well though.
I mean, Christ I'm going out with a girl who hates James Bond at the moment (unlucky me, eh) but hey what the . She's entitled to that opinion.
As for photoshop, well if that cover was done with that then wow - cool - I'm going to download the now to design my own covers, because if you ask me it's bloody great.
As for Auto-Tune, it was used to produce the prominent altered vocal effect on Cher's "Believe", recorded in 1998, the first major hit song to employ the software for this purpose
I think it's great. Sexy. Passionate. Whoever had the idea to incorporate this effect in a song like this should be awarded a noble prize. No serious. I love it!
So, to conclude, well done to Photoshop and auto-tune from Harry Fawkes
#1690
Posted 01 February 2011 - 07:29 PM
I agree with Simon. I really like the UK cover. Soon as I saw it I said: FLEMING!
I respect the opinion of those who dislike the cover as well though.
I mean, Christ I'm going out with a girl who hates James Bond at the moment (unlucky me, eh) but hey what the . She's entitled to that opinion.
As for photoshop, well if that cover was done with that then wow - cool - I'm going to download the now to design my own covers, because if you ask me it's bloody great.
As for Auto-Tune, it was used to produce the prominent altered vocal effect on Cher's "Believe", recorded in 1998, the first major hit song to employ the software for this purpose
I think it's great. Sexy. Passionate. Whoever had the idea to incorporate this effect in a song like this should be awarded a noble prize. No serious. I love it!
So, to conclude, well done to Photoshop and auto-tune from Harry Fawkes
Have you told this girlfriend of yours that you are an enthusiast of Cher?
#1691
Posted 01 February 2011 - 07:32 PM
I agree with Simon. I really like the UK cover. Soon as I saw it I said: FLEMING!
I respect the opinion of those who dislike the cover as well though.
I mean, Christ I'm going out with a girl who hates James Bond at the moment (unlucky me, eh) but hey what the . She's entitled to that opinion.
As for photoshop, well if that cover was done with that then wow - cool - I'm going to download the now to design my own covers, because if you ask me it's bloody great.
As for Auto-Tune, it was used to produce the prominent altered vocal effect on Cher's "Believe", recorded in 1998, the first major hit song to employ the software for this purpose
I think it's great. Sexy. Passionate. Whoever had the idea to incorporate this effect in a song like this should be awarded a noble prize. No serious. I love it!
So, to conclude, well done to Photoshop and auto-tune from Harry Fawkes
Have you told this girlfriend of yours that you are an enthusiast of Cher?
No but she's just read this post and she's packing up her bags I don't know why
#1692
Posted 01 February 2011 - 07:33 PM
Damn, what a giveaway.
#1693
Posted 01 February 2011 - 10:09 PM
Excellent ...No but she's just read this post and she's packing up her bags I don't know why
Have you told this girlfriend of yours that you are an enthusiast of Cher?
#1694
Posted 01 February 2011 - 10:51 PM
We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread
#1695
Posted 01 February 2011 - 10:53 PM
If someone arranged that for a first date with me it would be a very short and lonely date. Short for me, lonely for him.I went to see Cher in concert back in 2004 (on a first date no less, he paid for it - who was I to argue)
#1696
Posted 01 February 2011 - 10:59 PM
#1697
Posted 01 February 2011 - 11:05 PM
#1698
Posted 01 February 2011 - 11:44 PM
xxx
#1699
Posted 02 February 2011 - 02:01 AM
#1700
Posted 02 February 2011 - 05:58 PM
#1701
Posted 02 February 2011 - 06:03 PM
For those interest in use the image online, I just did a PNG (with transparent background) with the book cover. Hope you like it.
xxx
Oh, sincerely MarkettoOO7 that is fantastic mate!!!!
#1702
Posted 02 February 2011 - 07:10 PM
#1703
Posted 03 February 2011 - 12:07 AM
She probably doesn't believe in life after love, then.
Damn, what a giveaway.
#1704
Posted 04 February 2011 - 11:49 AM
#1705
Posted 13 February 2011 - 12:42 AM
Blimey- what a tacky colour scheme! They could have at least used the new one!
#1706
Posted 13 February 2011 - 03:26 AM
(Watch it be OnStar).
#1707
Posted 13 February 2011 - 10:40 PM
Interior of that Bentley is something else. Did anyone else catch the bit about "high-tech gadgetry?" I have faith in Deaver given his Lincoln Rhyme series that whatever that car is packing will be something special.
(Watch it be OnStar).
I think Deaver has the sense...I hope he has the sense not to pack the car with over the top gadgets like missiles etc. Subtle, realistic gadgets are welcome however. I hope he makes reference in the novel to the fact that the Bentley is battleship grey. I don't want the Bentley to be white. Not sure if Bond would be into red interior..?
#1708
Posted 14 February 2011 - 01:46 AM
Interior of that Bentley is something else. Did anyone else catch the bit about "high-tech gadgetry?" I have faith in Deaver given his Lincoln Rhyme series that whatever that car is packing will be something special.
(Watch it be OnStar).
I think Deaver has the sense...I hope he has the sense not to pack the car with over the top gadgets like missiles etc. Subtle, realistic gadgets are welcome however. I hope he makes reference in the novel to the fact that the Bentley is battleship grey. I don't want the Bentley to be white. Not sure if Bond would be into red interior..?
What I'm interested in is whether the Bentley will be Bond's own, or a company car he uses while in Dubai. I thought in that press release Deaver was by the exact model he wrote in the book. Only a couple more months now.
#1709
Posted 14 February 2011 - 01:44 PM
In the UK, the only folk of 28 years of age who drive Bentley Continentals are footballers. Hence, the relatively chavy image the cars have over here. And we don't want James Bond associated with that, do we???
(May be one of those things lost between here and the US Jeff hasn't had pointed out to him)
So, Jeff, just make Bond a bit older. Oooh, I don't know, say 38. Makes sense in so many ways. And he wouldn't look like a flash soccer player driving his latest toy, either, as a bonus.
#1710
Posted 14 February 2011 - 05:34 PM