Do YOU Want David Arnold to Return?
#211
Posted 12 September 2010 - 03:52 AM
The soundtracks for TND, TWINE and DAD were not overlong compared to CR and QoS, which is what makes the latter two so daunting for me to listen to. At least with the recently expanded soundtracks (eg TB, OHMSS, DAF, LALD, FYEO & TLD) I was already familiar with the original tracks and found it easier to assimilate the new material. CR and QoS seemed so much to take in at once.
So I have no objections to Arnold returning. On the other hand, if EON goes with someone else for B23, that's fine too. I enjoy George Martin and Bill Conti's contributions as much as I do John Barry's.
#212
Posted 19 September 2010 - 01:33 AM
I think Arnold's scores became much less complex with CR and QoS (also DAD), and compared to those scores, TND, TWINE and DAD are the ones that are overlong. DAD most certainly is.
QoS is complete on album, save for one or two minor cues, and is the shortest Bond score since, well, either TLD or AVTAK. I think even GoldenEye was longer.
I also think "Fall Of A House In Venice" is the definition of a redundant action cue that adds nothing to any given score or scene.
#213
Posted 19 September 2010 - 02:14 AM
Arnold's scores aren't really that complex. It's only because he composes and overlays his scores and instrumental voices on his keyboard and computer console, one gets that impression. Scores like say, TWINE or CR, are the worst in that manner. It's all, phoney 'studio composing' - something that I sincerely despise. Hence the result is that the music sounds jumbled, and crammed in. Mickey mousing, undisciplined writing, and audience telegraphing of the worst kind.
What else do Arnold's score lack? Subtlety, interesting orchestration, and a sense of humour. He also over-scores. Silence, or simply the lack of music, is one of the most important tools of a good composer.
#214
Posted 19 September 2010 - 02:51 AM
Humour in the Arnold sense is a suave statement of a few Bond theme chords. "The Vanish" cue comes to mind.
#215
Posted 19 September 2010 - 10:45 PM
If he just got rid of the awful electronics then it would be one of the best scores in the series.
#216
Posted 19 September 2010 - 11:10 PM
#217
Posted 20 September 2010 - 01:27 AM
#218
Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:18 PM
I challenge the shark or anyone really to listen to this peice from 1993's the fugitive and tell me it's not amazing
#219
Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:30 PM
how about James Newtown Howard
I challenge the shark or anyone really to listen to this peice from 1993's the fugitive and tell me it's not amazing
It's not amazing. It serves the film, but not much more than that. The synth pads and so forth, do date quite a bit, and like practically everything else James Newton Howard has written it's overly simple and banal. He just gets an orchestra with overdubbed electronics to play what could be easily be performed on a synthesiser. He's just a more restrained, introspective version of Hans Zimmer.
DIE ANOTHER DAY as Arnold's strongest? Hm. I've always been put off by the awful, overbearing electronics.
All of Arnold's scores have awful, overbearing electronics. I just prefer what's buried under the layers of drum and bass extremest here, than in his other scores.
I have a lot of time for 'Bond in Havana', and rather like 'A Touch of Frost', 'Whiteout', and 'Some Kind of Hero'.
#220
Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:35 PM
Some more than others. DIE ANOTHER DAY is particularly bad in this respect.All of Arnold's scores have awful, overbearing electronics.
#221
Posted 20 September 2010 - 09:38 PM
Some more than others. DIE ANOTHER DAY is particularly bad in this respect.All of Arnold's scores have awful, overbearing electronics.
Well, for some odd reason, I prefer the drum loops he comes up with here, than say in Casino Royalale, Quantum of Solace, and The World Is Not Enough.
#222
Posted 27 September 2010 - 02:17 PM
Some more than others. DIE ANOTHER DAY is particularly bad in this respect.All of Arnold's scores have awful, overbearing electronics.
I don't like DIE ANOTHER DAY much ,but i do think that the cheap sounding electronics on the soundtrack go well with the film.I think they enhance the fun of the tackiness of the film. A classy score would be not be appropriate here.
CR and QOS have classy scores for classy films.
#223
Posted 27 September 2010 - 02:43 PM
#224
Posted 27 September 2010 - 02:59 PM
#225
Posted 01 October 2010 - 02:36 PM
#226
Posted 02 October 2010 - 12:44 AM
#227
Posted 02 October 2010 - 01:37 AM
#228
Posted 10 October 2010 - 12:51 AM
If it's not happening on Bond 23, it probably won't happen for a long time.
#229
Posted 16 October 2010 - 03:49 PM
#230
Posted 16 October 2010 - 10:55 PM
#231
Posted 17 October 2010 - 04:58 AM
#232
Posted 17 October 2010 - 06:22 AM
Agreed about Thunderball, it is one of my favourite scores. Yet it is based around four themes, Thunderball, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, 007 and The James Bond Theme, two of which are not even unique to that film. Yet for me at least, it works. A tribute to John Barry's talents - he can write a music score and re-cycle two themes from previous films and still create a great work (his arrangement of the 007 theme for TB is my favourite, and it was great to finally hear it on the 30th Anniversary Limited Edition double CD and later in the expanded TB CD.)Let's face it fellas! In a movie as good as Casino Royale the score was mediocre. There were one or two good moments in 25 tracks. And when I say moments I don't mean tracks, but seconds from tracks. Take Blunt Instrument for instance. The good part was the last 30 seconds. The rest of it noise. Then take Thunderball. Every track is a masterpiece. Every track is magnificent from 0:01 to the end. We need a composer that can make the best out of every story!
#233
Posted 17 October 2010 - 06:30 AM
#234
Posted 17 October 2010 - 01:16 PM
#235
Posted 17 October 2010 - 09:31 PM
Absolutely! He's the only Bond composer to successfully "channel" Barry's rich style. Don't get me wrong, DAD wasn't very strong, but the last couple have been magnificent now that he's abandoned the techno stuff in favor of the original Bond style.
He hasn't channelled Barry's style, merely paid a few superficial homages. Most of it's within Arnold's own (limited) 'big blockbuster' idiom.
And Arnold hasn't abandoned the synth beats, by any means. Almost every track (with a few notable exceptions) on CR and QOS contain slick electronics.
Having listened to his Star Trek soundtrack quite recently, I would suggest Michael Giachinno to score a Bond film. The Trek score is quite straightforward and effective, imo, and I noticed with the closing track that he incorporated a reasonably faithful adaptation of the original Alexander Courage theme from the TV series. Which suggests to me that if signed to score Bond he could produce a decent work, but not mess about too much with the original Bond theme, or the interpolations of it throughout the film.
He did a nice re-working of Courage's theme, but everything else was just mindless, overly digital-ised filler.
#236
Posted 17 October 2010 - 10:28 PM
and who would u like cause everyone we mention u shoot down. Just curious
Absolutely! He's the only Bond composer to successfully "channel" Barry's rich style. Don't get me wrong, DAD wasn't very strong, but the last couple have been magnificent now that he's abandoned the techno stuff in favor of the original Bond style.
He hasn't channelled Barry's style, merely paid a few superficial homages. Most of it's within Arnold's own (limited) 'big blockbuster' idiom.
And Arnold hasn't abandoned the synth beats, by any means. Almost every track (with a few notable exceptions) on CR and QOS contain slick electronics.Having listened to his Star Trek soundtrack quite recently, I would suggest Michael Giachinno to score a Bond film. The Trek score is quite straightforward and effective, imo, and I noticed with the closing track that he incorporated a reasonably faithful adaptation of the original Alexander Courage theme from the TV series. Which suggests to me that if signed to score Bond he could produce a decent work, but not mess about too much with the original Bond theme, or the interpolations of it throughout the film.
He did a nice re-working of Courage's theme, but everything else was just mindless, overly digital-ised filler.
#237
Posted 17 October 2010 - 10:37 PM
and who would u like cause everyone we mention u shoot down. Just curious
Absolutely! He's the only Bond composer to successfully "channel" Barry's rich style. Don't get me wrong, DAD wasn't very strong, but the last couple have been magnificent now that he's abandoned the techno stuff in favor of the original Bond style.
He hasn't channelled Barry's style, merely paid a few superficial homages. Most of it's within Arnold's own (limited) 'big blockbuster' idiom.
And Arnold hasn't abandoned the synth beats, by any means. Almost every track (with a few notable exceptions) on CR and QOS contain slick electronics.Having listened to his Star Trek soundtrack quite recently, I would suggest Michael Giachinno to score a Bond film. The Trek score is quite straightforward and effective, imo, and I noticed with the closing track that he incorporated a reasonably faithful adaptation of the original Alexander Courage theme from the TV series. Which suggests to me that if signed to score Bond he could produce a decent work, but not mess about too much with the original Bond theme, or the interpolations of it throughout the film.
He did a nice re-working of Courage's theme, but everything else was just mindless, overly digital-ised filler.
Elliot Goldenthal.
#238
Posted 18 October 2010 - 08:48 PM
If Arnold wanted to mix things up a bit, fine. I think he did it, but after awhile, you have to get back on track. I thought he did a beautiful job with TMD and TWINE and I don't see why he can't bring those elements back. I too am ready for a traditional Bond score. We will never get Barry back, but film composers know exactly the sound of Bond. Listen to the score for the Incredibles. There were SO many Bond elements and sounds in that score. I know Arnold can do it. He has done it. But if he is going to continue down this path of making the scores sound like any other films except Bond films, then I think it's time to bring in a new composer. Just my 2 cents.
I think the main problem with David Arnold by now is just that he doesn't have anything to say anymore, musically. What he did have to say was milked dry by the time we got Die Another Day.
Really, the thing is that the scope of the music grew with the scope of the films. Listen to Tomorrow Never Dies for instance - it is a multimillion blockbuster score. I wouldn't call Goldfinger or YOLT or OHMSS or Octopussy that.
The music became blockbuster music, just like the movies were restructured as action blockbusters in the Brosnan era. Now with Craig, they are still largely action blockbusters, but they have an element that Arnold isn't able to cover, I think.
Arnold's work is largely serious in tone and melodramatic. Barry never, or seldomly, was. Brooding maybe, or thrilling, but never overly serious or melodramatic.
The cinematic environment just completely changed, and Arnold delivers what is expected from an action/spy movie. He may have Barry influences, but honestly, it sounds more like an evolution of Michael Kamen's score than anything else, with tendencies to abandon the Bond sound in favour of generic action music.
Bond music always was sort of a beast of its own, and Arnold slightly moved away from that. Not unintentionally on his/the producers' part I dare say.
A score very much in the tradition of John Barry would indeed be welcome, but no producer/director in his right mind would apply a score like OHMSS to a film like Quantum Of Solace (James Horner's comment about Gabriel Yared's rejected Troy score sounding like a 40 year old Hercules movie springs to mind). Not to mention that there probably is no composer working right now who could create the same magic, unless he wanted to just ape Barry.
Plus, John Barry's Bond scores were all relatively short. What directors nowadays would go for a 60 minutes score for a 100+ minutes film? Moreover, what composers today would be able to create a soundscape that leaves a distinct musical mark, as Barry was so ingenius at doing.
An excellent choice would be Elliot Goldenthal indeed. He is versatile enough.
#239
Posted 21 October 2010 - 07:22 PM
#240
Posted 21 October 2010 - 07:49 PM
David Arnold must return. When even John Barry recommended Arnold to barbara broccoli, that says a lot.
Even the great John Barry isn't infallible. He can make grave errors just like any of us.
As of now - Please EON, end this musical monotony. Hire another composer to once again breath life into Bond.

