
Would anyone like to see the return of a male M?
#211
Posted 12 November 2011 - 05:05 PM
M is for male!
#212
Posted 13 November 2011 - 09:01 AM
No, it's not. In the novels, it is implied that "M" is for "Miles". Or "Messervy".M is for male!
#213
Posted 13 November 2011 - 09:07 AM
No, it's not. In the novels, it is implied that "M" is for "Miles". Or "Messervy".
M is for male!
One suspects the observation was not to be taken literally.
#214
Posted 13 November 2011 - 09:30 PM
#215
Posted 13 November 2011 - 09:33 PM
#216
Posted 13 November 2011 - 09:39 PM
#217
Posted 13 November 2011 - 11:00 PM
I agree. He's played authority roles for decades - right from the 1970s comedy "Rising Damp", when he oozed class as Rigsby's "royal" lodger. I can see him as "M".There have been several very fine choices already as to a possible replacement for Judi Dench if Bond 23 does prove to be her swan song. It could make for a very dramatic storyline if handled correctly and the arrival of her replacement provides some interesting possibilities.
One of my top choices for the role would be Don Warrington and anyone who is familiar with his work will know he has a superb voice that oozes authority and class.
He isn't an obvious choice compared to other actors with higher profiles (Anthony Hopkins, Peter Firth) but he is well respected and I could imagine some great exchanges between him and Bond.
#218
Posted 14 November 2011 - 12:58 AM
Ian McShane would make for a very strong and interesting M for Bond...
I would have never thought of him. It's a great idea.
#219
Posted 14 November 2011 - 06:20 AM
Don't you feel that Dench is overly dominating as M though?
Oh the horrors! A female character is overly dominating in a Bond film, despite the fact that she is Bond's boss.
Frankly, I would rather see another actress portray M. But I keep forgetting . . . the idea of a woman being the authority figure of a man is supposed to be a no-no in this sexist society.
#220
Posted 14 November 2011 - 07:00 AM

This is always how I imagined M in the novels.
#221
Posted 14 November 2011 - 09:28 PM


#222
Posted 03 January 2012 - 09:23 AM
The situation has of course changed CONSIDERABLY from the time I first started this thread. Last year saw the release of 'Carte Blanche' a book which feature a rebooted 21st century incarnation of M. I quiet liked Deaver's re-interpretation of Miles Messervy and actually hope, if we see a male M, it will borrow some inspiration from this version.
Deaver's M is a consummate professional spymaster who completely trusts Bond on both a personal and professional level...he is also more than aware of the political infighting and skulduggery and surrounds him, but knows how to maneuver that treacherous minefield pretty well.
The political aspects of M's job is something which modern adaptations of James Bond, be it in books or films, HAVE to deal with. In Fleming's day, Britain, like the rest of the Western World, was gripped by the Cold War paranoia to some extent and as such the autonomy and independent functioning of the Secret Service was considered of national importance (even pride)...so M could always count on the support of the higher-ups in any eventuality. (Hell, I seem to recall, in OHMSS, he consults the Minister of Defence, who agrees with his and Bond's plans of carrying out an officially unsanctioned and illegal hit on Blofeld's base in Piz Gloria...)
But the situation has changed considerably today. A lot of ethical concerns have been raised regarding the activities of secret services, rightly or wrongly...and the Bond books/films need to reflect this reality. Part of Deaver's novel was about this slippery slope 'special agents' like Bond tread on daily...they have 'carte blanche' to complete their missions as they see fit, but there are legal and ethical implications to their actions which they are compelled to consider. M should be the chessmaster who knows how to navigate this minefield of politics, ethics and international law...a man or woman who has to deploy agents to 'save the world' but also ensure the British government doesn't get any 'bad press' in the process!
#223
Posted 03 January 2012 - 03:34 PM
I'd like to see Anthony Stewart Head in the role:
This is always how I imagined M in the novels.
Very interesting idea. He could pull it off and NOT intrude too much.
A male M, by the way, would be most welcome... and original, too - since we had this mother-son-dynamic for a very long time now.
The top of my list is Alan Rickman. He NEEDS to be in a Bond movie. Gary Oldman would be pretty damn good, too.
Both would certainly be great - but of a too high profile, IMO. They would definitely feature into the plot like Dench did/does... and that´s not necessary at all.
#224
Posted 04 January 2012 - 01:00 PM
I just fear that Head may see the role as being too similar to Rupert Giles.Very interesting idea. He could pull it off and NOT intrude too much.
#225
Posted 04 January 2012 - 01:39 PM
#226
Posted 04 January 2012 - 01:54 PM
Jeremy Irons...brilliant idea!
I always thought he'd be great as a villain (think Die Hard w/Vengeance)
#227
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:34 PM
Of course. And I think he can do that easily - there was one episode early in the sixth season where he tore strips off Willow Rosenberg for being a "rank, arrogant amateur" after she revived Buffy. And then later in the sixth season when Willow became Dark Willow and he was the one sent to stop her. But my concern is that Head would see the role of M as being a little too similar to Giles; the older authoritative figure.He obviously would have to play it differently. More acerbic, more authoritative.
#228
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:49 PM
Personally, I'll wait for the movie, or at least the next official press release. ;-)
http://www.starpulse...t_new_james_bon
#229
Posted 05 January 2012 - 01:25 AM
It appeared on these forums first.I noticed this on yahoo today, and, of course, we should take anything internet based with an entire salt cellar full of salt.
#230
Posted 05 January 2012 - 01:25 PM
I noticed this on yahoo today, and, of course, we should take anything internet based with an entire salt cellar full of salt. But, if true, it looks like everyone here wanting a male M to return might - only might - get their wish, and it may explain one bit of Skyfall casting.
Personally, I'll wait for the movie, or at least the next official press release. ;-)
http://www.starpulse...t_new_james_bon
SPOILERS
Well, the notion that Judi Dench's M might need to quit owing to the events of this movie WAS something we have been speculating about for a while...
#231
Posted 06 January 2012 - 05:29 PM
I noticed this on yahoo today, and, of course, we should take anything internet based with an entire salt cellar full of salt. But, if true, it looks like everyone here wanting a male M to return might - only might - get their wish, and it may explain one bit of Skyfall casting.
Personally, I'll wait for the movie, or at least the next official press release. ;-)
http://www.starpulse...t_new_james_bon
SPOILERS
Well, the notion that Judi Dench's M might need to quit owing to the events of this movie WAS something we have been speculating about for a while...
Indeed. I'd wondered about it, and suggested M's replacement might turn out to be a "wrong 'un" working for Quantum. Not a popular suggestion at the time, although in the real world at least one former British Intelligence chief was rumoured to have been working for the opposition while in his post. No Quantum in this new movie, but the idea of "M" as one of the bad guys - well, I think it could be a future plot idea. Whether it should, of course......
#232
Posted 07 January 2012 - 07:15 AM
#233
Posted 07 January 2012 - 11:25 AM
Well if it is time for Dame Judi to move on, and Ralph Fiennes isn't the new M. I woud like to throw Stephen Tompkinson's hat into th ring.
If the rumour mill generates something true for once, and Fiennes is the new M, I wonder if he will be a permanent replacement? By which I mean will he back for 24, 25, 26 and so on? Can't help thinking he might not be - then again, who could have predicted that Dame Judi would do seven Bond films?
#234
Posted 07 January 2012 - 12:12 PM
#235
Posted 07 January 2012 - 02:19 PM
You know if Dame Judi doesn't meet her maker in this one, and she just retires from MI6. I don't really think we'll see the last of her. With an actress as good as Judi, even though she might very well step down as M, I wouldn't be surprised if she comes back for Bond 24, just as a minor character. Just an ally Bond can turn to and trust and get some advice from. Maybe a Mathis/Felix type character.
That would actually be interesting. Bond could break into her flat again and ask for advice.
#236
Posted 08 April 2012 - 11:34 PM
#237
Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:45 AM
#238
Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:49 AM
I don't mean to sound rude but I was thinking the title of this thread could be interpreted as some what politically incorrect.
All the more reason to keep it then.
#239
Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:58 AM
I don't mean to sound rude but I was thinking the title of this thread could be interpreted as some what politically incorrect.
All the more reason to keep it then.
AMEN!!!
#240
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:55 AM
I second that!!!
I don't mean to sound rude but I was thinking the title of this thread could be interpreted as some what politically incorrect.
All the more reason to keep it then.
AMEN!!!
With that said; I don't think it really matters if M is male or Female. I want a strong actor ( is the term actor sexist?) who brings something to the role and the series.