I think she'd be another Christmas Jones and we've already got one of those.
Yeah, and her name is Gemma Arterton.
Posted 23 July 2009 - 10:08 PM
I think she'd be another Christmas Jones and we've already got one of those.
Posted 23 July 2009 - 10:14 PM
I think she'd be another Christmas Jones and we've already got one of those.
Yeah, and her name is Gemma Arterton.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 12:38 AM
Posted 24 July 2009 - 12:45 AM
http://www.people.co...0293363,00.html
Did Transformers hottie Megan Fox turn up her nose at playing a Bond Girl in the next 007 film?
Reports circulating online say Fox, 23, had signed on to play one of Bond's sexy conquests, but passed on the role because "she'd rather be a more central part of the movie."
Not so, Fox's rep tells PEOPLE exclusively: "The report about Megan Fox turning down a Bond movie is completely not true. There have been no discussions nor any offers. Megan is a fan of the Bond movies."
Meanwhile, Fox is slated to attend Comic Con in San Diego this week, to do publicity for her films Jonah Hex and Jennifer's Body.
I think we can safely say this thread now belongs in Tabloid Trash.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 12:52 AM
http://www.people.co...0293363,00.html
Did Transformers hottie Megan Fox turn up her nose at playing a Bond Girl in the next 007 film?
Reports circulating online say Fox, 23, had signed on to play one of Bond's sexy conquests, but passed on the role because "she'd rather be a more central part of the movie."
Not so, Fox's rep tells PEOPLE exclusively: "The report about Megan Fox turning down a Bond movie is completely not true. There have been no discussions nor any offers. Megan is a fan of the Bond movies."
Meanwhile, Fox is slated to attend Comic Con in San Diego this week, to do publicity for her films Jonah Hex and Jennifer's Body.
I think we can safely say this thread now belongs in Tabloid Trash.
So there is still hope.
oh and can someone tell me who a mod is so i can ask them to PLEASE put a sticky note on my bond 23 tabloid trash thread.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 01:35 AM
http://www.people.co...0293363,00.html
Did Transformers hottie Megan Fox turn up her nose at playing a Bond Girl in the next 007 film?
Reports circulating online say Fox, 23, had signed on to play one of Bond's sexy conquests, but passed on the role because "she'd rather be a more central part of the movie."
Not so, Fox's rep tells PEOPLE exclusively: "The report about Megan Fox turning down a Bond movie is completely not true. There have been no discussions nor any offers. Megan is a fan of the Bond movies."
Meanwhile, Fox is slated to attend Comic Con in San Diego this week, to do publicity for her films Jonah Hex and Jennifer's Body.
I think we can safely say this thread now belongs in Tabloid Trash.
So there is still hope.
oh and can someone tell me who a mod is so i can ask them to PLEASE put a sticky note on my bond 23 tabloid trash thread.
Sure, for future ref, just click on the "MoneyPenny" tab on the controls line and it will give you the list.
Administrators
Greg
Mister Asterix
The Admiral
Global Moderators
[dark]
Athena007
Blofeld's Cat
Bryce (003)
doublenoughtspy
Dunph
Jim
K1Bond007
Qwerty
stromberg
Tim007
Posted 25 July 2009 - 04:37 PM
Saw her at Comic Con. I now officially have a full-blown thing for Mega Fox. (BTW, Jonah Hex looks awesome.)Meanwhile, Fox is slated to attend Comic Con in San Diego this week, to do publicity for her films Jonah Hex and Jennifer's Body.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 04:49 PM
I knew this story was BS.
Saw her at Comic Con. I now officially have a full-blown thing for Mega Fox. (BTW, Jonah Hex looks awesome.)Meanwhile, Fox is slated to attend Comic Con in San Diego this week, to do publicity for her films Jonah Hex and Jennifer's Body.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 04:53 PM
Posted 25 July 2009 - 05:04 PM
Posted 25 July 2009 - 05:52 PM
Posted 25 July 2009 - 06:14 PM
Saw her at Comic Con. I now officially have a full-blown thing for Mega Fox.
What I like about Mega Fox is she is a true Hollywood "Sex Symbol." That is something different from an actress (acting ability really doesn't matter), and even different than a "Movie Star." A Sex Symbol is far more rare than a Movie Star. There have only been a handful of great sex symbols; Mae West, Jean Harlow, Marylyn Monroe, Bridget Bardot... and they tend to burn out fast (and sometimes tragically). They also tend to be as hated as they are loved in their moment because their open sexuality is "dangerous" and threatening (to some). That's how you know they are true sex symbols. Mega Fox is right at her moment, her bloom, and to see a new sex symbol right at her moment is really special. It does not come along all that often.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 06:58 PM
What I like about Mega Fox is she is a true Hollywood "Sex Symbol." That is something different from an actress (acting ability really doesn't matter), and even different than a "Movie Star." A Sex Symbol is far more rare than a Movie Star. There have only been a handful of great sex symbols; Mae West, Jean Harlow, Marylyn Monroe, Bridget Bardot... and they tend to burn out fast (and sometimes tragically). They also tend to be as hated as they are loved in their moment because their open sexuality is "dangerous" and threatening (to some). That's how you know they are true sex symbols. Mega Fox is right at her moment, her bloom, and to see a new sex symbol right at her moment is really special. It does not come along all that often.
Edited by baerrtt, 25 July 2009 - 07:03 PM.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 07:24 PM
Posted 25 July 2009 - 07:30 PM
Exactly.The difference here is that Fox has no discernible personality to me beyond looking 'really hot'. Monroe was likeable, Bardot playful, West was funny and subversive but I see none of those traits in her.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 08:19 PM
Posted 25 July 2009 - 08:48 PM
Classy over trashy please, and Megan Fox's looks really scream trashy to me.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 08:57 PM
So did Clooney but I won't go there.Classy over trashy please, and Megan Fox's looks really scream trashy to me.
Her actions scream trashy, too. If I recall correctly she had a pet pig.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 09:09 PM
So did Clooney but I won't go there.Classy over trashy please, and Megan Fox's looks really scream trashy to me.
Her actions scream trashy, too. If I recall correctly she had a pet pig.
Edited by Tybre, 25 July 2009 - 09:09 PM.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 09:16 PM
What I like about Mega Fox is she is a true Hollywood "Sex Symbol." That is something different from an actress (acting ability really doesn't matter), and even different than a "Movie Star." A Sex Symbol is far more rare than a Movie Star. There have only been a handful of great sex symbols; Mae West, Jean Harlow, Marylyn Monroe, Bridget Bardot... and they tend to burn out fast (and sometimes tragically). They also tend to be as hated as they are loved in their moment because their open sexuality is "dangerous" and threatening (to some). That's how you know they are true sex symbols. Mega Fox is right at her moment, her bloom, and to see a new sex symbol right at her moment is really special. It does not come along all that often.
The difference here is that Fox has no discernible personality to me beyond looking 'really hot'. Monroe was likeable, Bardot playful, West was funny and subversive but I see none of those traits in her. Maybe she'll prove detratctors like me wrong one day but the way Hollywood treats female talent nowadays as disposable I doubt it.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 09:26 PM
So did Clooney but I won't go there.Classy over trashy please, and Megan Fox's looks really scream trashy to me.
Her actions scream trashy, too. If I recall correctly she had a pet pig.
Well Clooney doesn't exactly epitomize classy either. Though at least the man's got some class. Fox is just utterly void.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 10:26 PM
Posted 25 July 2009 - 11:11 PM
Is this a bond message board or The view? I'm sorry I'm a little confused.
My point is basically this she isn't going to be cast we all know this. She isn't exactly a good actress we all know that. Some find her sexy and want to do things to her (this apparently is a family board I think we all know what "things" mean if you don't i believe most are talking about playing a long game of monoply with her). Some find her repulsive and annoying and want her to go to the same hole the sucked up Danielle Fishel, the cast of Saved by the Bell, and Paulie Shore (why can't Will Ferral go to the same hole.) Are we that depraved for Bond 23 rumour, News, and conjecture that we need to devote three pages on honestly I have no idea if these three pages have a point. Danslittlefinger what point do you see to this.
P.S. please everyone this is a light hearted ribbing at a thread that was taken way to seriously.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 11:12 PM
but the weird thumb stuff etc i dunno i don't get it.Is this a bond message board or The view? I'm sorry I'm a little confused.
My point is basically this she isn't going to be cast we all know this. She isn't exactly a good actress we all know that. Some find her sexy and want to do things to her (this apparently is a family board I think we all know what "things" mean if you don't i believe most are talking about playing a long game of monoply with her). Some find her repulsive and annoying and want her to go to the same hole the sucked up Danielle Fishel, the cast of Saved by the Bell, and Paulie Shore (why can't Will Ferral go to the same hole.) Are we that depraved for Bond 23 rumour, News, and conjecture that we need to devote three pages on honestly I have no idea if these three pages have a point. Danslittlefinger what point do you see to this.
P.S. please everyone this is a light hearted ribbing at a thread that was taken way to seriously.
??? My remarks were light hearted like everyone else's. I don't think anyone is really taking this seriously are they? I think this thread should be under the Bond 23 rumour one you started tbh.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 11:19 PM
but the weird thumb stuff etc i dunno i don't get it.Is this a bond message board or The view? I'm sorry I'm a little confused.
My point is basically this she isn't going to be cast we all know this. She isn't exactly a good actress we all know that. Some find her sexy and want to do things to her (this apparently is a family board I think we all know what "things" mean if you don't i believe most are talking about playing a long game of monoply with her). Some find her repulsive and annoying and want her to go to the same hole the sucked up Danielle Fishel, the cast of Saved by the Bell, and Paulie Shore (why can't Will Ferral go to the same hole.) Are we that depraved for Bond 23 rumour, News, and conjecture that we need to devote three pages on honestly I have no idea if these three pages have a point. Danslittlefinger what point do you see to this.
P.S. please everyone this is a light hearted ribbing at a thread that was taken way to seriously.
??? My remarks were light hearted like everyone else's. I don't think anyone is really taking this seriously are they? I think this thread should be under the Bond 23 rumour one you started tbh.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 11:22 PM
Posted 25 July 2009 - 11:25 PM
What is wrong with having a pet pig?
Posted 25 July 2009 - 11:44 PM
Posted 25 July 2009 - 11:51 PM
You really think? Seems to me that she's trying too hard.What I like about Mega Fox is she is a true Hollywood "Sex Symbol." That is something different from an actress (acting ability really doesn't matter), and even different than a "Movie Star." A Sex Symbol is far more rare than a Movie Star. There have only been a handful of great sex symbols; Mae West, Jean Harlow, Marylyn Monroe, Bridget Bardot... and they tend to burn out fast (and sometimes tragically). They also tend to be as hated as they are loved in their moment because their open sexuality is "dangerous" and threatening (to some). That's how you know they are true sex symbols. Mega Fox is right at her moment, her bloom, and to see a new sex symbol right at her moment is really special. It does not come along all that often.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 11:57 PM
What is wrong with having a pet pig?