I guess most posters here know this but most of the footage of Bond turning and firing is the same from movie to movie. It was only reshot if the aspect ratio of the movie was going to be different. I only say this as some people here were being very specific about a certain film's walk or pose when it was infact the same bit of footage as the previous movie's!
In all cases, the music is different everytime and the circle often opens out in different places on the screen. Only Dr. No and OHMSS had the producers' names appear midway through the White dots.
For the record:
Dr. No - GF all used stuntman Bob Simmonds as Bond. No doubt it was thought up after Sean had left the production or it was envisioned as being unimportant who played Bond in what is essentially a silohuette. It was filmed in black and White, flat 35mm. Exact aspect ratio, I couldn't say (1.85:1 perhaps) but it's been cropped somewhat on DVD to 16:9 or thereabouts.
TB - DAF used same Panavision (2.35:1) footage of Connery. only TB was in colour, the others were not. The barrel itself changes, in TB it was blue tinted, in DAF it had light reflections inside it.
OHMSS was obviously a one off for Lazanby, also featurIng the light reflections. Also the blood obscures him completely; in other films, it is transparent.
LALD and TMWTGG were identical, shot in flat 35mm. All films were anamorphic after this.
Spy -AVTAK are identical except FYEO which doesn't allow for the circle to open into the film proper; it vanishes with a jump cut.
Both of Dalton's were the same, too.
All of Brosnan's were the same except for the addition of the CG bullet in DAD.
Craig's two were created especially for each film. It'll be interesting to see how they appear from now on.
Anyone any idea why Moore's first two were shot in non-anamorphic 35mm? A budgetary reason? Was it Guy Hamilton's preferred format (even though he made several films, including DAF in scope)?
Edited by Dan Gale, 04 October 2009 - 08:43 PM.