She looks like a cheap whore ... but I suppose that's what no-taste predicable 24 year old generation WHY's go for instead of class like 40-somethings do.Here's the latest rumor regarding Bond 23's female lead:
Story: Israeli actress Esti Ginzburg approached
Israeli actress Esti Ginzburg
Can't say I know much about her, but she certainly looks the part. Also, while it doesn't really matter in the end, I'd prefer them to cast a blonde only because CR and QoS both had brunette female leads.
Obviously, there's a long way to go though before anything is official.

Skyfall Tabloid Trash Bin
#301
Posted 27 May 2011 - 02:35 AM
#302
Posted 27 May 2011 - 02:36 AM
#303
Posted 27 May 2011 - 03:04 AM
YES. Then again I'm 24 not 40-something, but still....
She looks like a cheap whore ... but I suppose that's what no-taste predicable 24 year old generation WHY's go for instead of class like 40-somethings do.
Was that directed at me?
You have a lot of experience with cheap whores, then? What exactly makes a beautiful young Israeli woman look like a cheap whore, I'm curious.
We can disagree on taste in women, certainly, but calling a woman you've never met a "whore" and a man you've never met "a no-taste predicable generation WHY" is a bit over the top. Methinks thou dost protest too much.
And as a side note, THIS 24 year old generation WHY is busy traveling the world, working on his third language, and dating some of the most beautiful and classy women in the world, instead of calling people whores. How's that for predictable?
#304
Posted 27 May 2011 - 03:04 AM
#305
Posted 27 May 2011 - 03:18 AM
She looks like a cheap whore ... but I suppose that's what no-taste predicable 24 year old generation WHY's go for instead of class like 40-somethings do.
Right...b/c she's dressed any more provocatively than the majority of other Bond Girls throughout the series history..../sarcasm. She looks like any other young and sexy woman.
This should be in the tabloid trash bin. Ginzburg was born on March 6, 1990. She's two years older than Craig's daughter...
Since when is the pairing of a 40-something Bond with a 20-something actress new for this series (it's happened countless times)...not to mention this wouldn't even remotely compare to the Moore/Sutton case which was just creepy...Grandpa Bond and his college-age lover..
YES. Then again I'm 24 not 40-something, but still....She looks like a cheap whore ... but I suppose that's what no-taste predicable 24 year old generation WHY's go for instead of class like 40-somethings do.
Was that directed at me?
You have a lot of experience with cheap whores, then? What exactly makes a beautiful young Israeli woman look like a cheap whore, I'm curious.
We can disagree on taste in women, certainly, but calling a woman you've never met a "whore" and a man you've never met "a no-taste predicable generation WHY" is a bit over the top. Methinks thou dost protest too much.
And as a side note, THIS 24 year old generation WHY is busy traveling the world, working on his third language, and dating some of the most beautiful and classy women in the world, instead of calling people whores. How's that for predictable?
Cheers on this post. I'd like to know the answer to the "cheap whore" question as well. Sounds like unwarranted bitterness and resentment toward young, hot people to me.
Edited by 00 Brosnan, 27 May 2011 - 05:36 AM.
#306
Posted 27 May 2011 - 06:07 AM
She's mainly a model, I've never seen her act, but as long as it's not the main Bond girl, she'll be fine. She is a bit young (my age), but as long as Craig is in shape, it should be fine.
#307
Posted 27 May 2011 - 06:22 AM
I'm indifferent. Fine in a smaller role. Not the main Bond girl part. Too pretty?!? (Is that possible?)
#308
Posted 27 May 2011 - 07:27 AM
Too pretty?!? (Is that possible?)
She does have a certain innocent look to her. Then again so did Fields, and she was gorgeous.
#309
Posted 27 May 2011 - 09:06 AM
#310
Posted 27 May 2011 - 06:31 PM
another bond girl potential ... we'll see what happens 2 girls both blondes perhaps Bond will have blond this time around?
#311
Posted 05 June 2011 - 01:49 PM
#313
Posted 05 June 2011 - 02:35 PM
#314
Posted 06 June 2011 - 01:52 AM
It appears you need a subscription to view the article.http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/notw/nol_showbiz/1314225/Naomie-Harris-is-new-Bond-girl.html
this is a rumour i would be rather happy turned true
I have to ask: why do you have a subscription to a rag that's not fit to wipe your bottom with?
#315
Posted 06 June 2011 - 02:17 PM
#316
Posted 06 June 2011 - 04:27 PM
Because Murdoch thinks people are stupid enough to pay to read his tripe. And, sadly, some people are.It appears you need a subscription to view the article.
http://www.newsofthe...-Bond-girl.html
this is a rumour i would be rather happy turned true
I have to ask: why do you have a subscription to a rag that's not fit to wipe your bottom with?
#317
Posted 21 June 2011 - 02:58 PM
"MUMBAI: Twenty eight years after Octopussy was shot in India, the filming of the 23rd film in the 007 series is set to return to the subcontinent. The film, Bond 23, will be shot in the Big ND Studio located in Karjat, neighbouring Mumbai.
Last April, director Sam Mendes had visited India with the film's production designer Terry Bamber on location hunting. This is when they firmed up their plans to shoot at the studio. According to reports, the opening sequence of the Daniel Craig starrer will be shot in a three-week spell at the studio, founded by veteran art director Nitin Desai.
The set constructed at the studio depicts main roads, shops, bylanes in the vicinity of the CST Terminus and also the Crawford market.
It is said that the opening sequence will start off with a chase sequence in South Mumbai. The sequence that will also have blowing up of several cars will serve as a right opening to the film.
Directors of Bond films prefer landmark locations for their shoots. Director John Glen shot Octopussy in India in prime venues like The Jag Mandir in Udaipur and Taj Mahal in Agra."
thoughts?
#318
Posted 21 June 2011 - 03:43 PM
#319
Posted 21 June 2011 - 04:21 PM
#320
Posted 21 June 2011 - 04:27 PM
Last April, director Sam Mendes had visited India with the film's production designer Terry Bamber on location hunting. This is when they firmed up their plans to shoot at the studio.
thoughts?
Terry Bamber is NOT a production designer
He says he was NOT in India during April, in fact he was unwell and at home in the UK
He has NOT started working on Bond 23
#321
Posted 21 June 2011 - 05:36 PM
#322
Posted 21 June 2011 - 05:57 PM
OK... Ick!!!This should be in the tabloid trash bin. Ginzburg was born on March 6, 1990. She's two years older than Craig's daughter...
#323
Posted 21 June 2011 - 06:02 PM
EDITEDbut bond 23 will have an explosive opening sequence irregardless.
#324
Posted 21 June 2011 - 06:38 PM
i mean Zorin do you think bond 23 will have boring opening sequence?EDITED
but bond 23 will have an explosive opening sequence irregardless.
i mean I think we can all confirm bond 23's pre title sequence will be explosive and exciting right?
#325
Posted 21 June 2011 - 06:49 PM
#326
Posted 21 June 2011 - 06:54 PM
i mean I think we can all confirm bond 23's pre title sequence will be explosive and exciting right?
I'm guessing there will be some violence and sexual situations in the film too.
I don't need a badly written, inaccurate Indian "newspaper", and I do put the term in quotes, to tell me that.
#327
Posted 21 June 2011 - 07:13 PM
i mean Zorin do you think bond 23 will have boring opening sequence?
EDITED
but bond 23 will have an explosive opening sequence irregardless.
i mean I think we can all confirm bond 23's pre title sequence will be explosive and exciting right?
Not news that justifies the reporting of it, surely?
#328
Posted 22 June 2011 - 07:13 AM
http://www.indiantelevision.com/aac/y2k11/aac646.php
"MUMBAI: Twenty eight years after Octopussy was shot in India, the filming of the 23rd film in the 007 series is set to return to the subcontinent. The film, Bond 23, will be shot in the Big ND Studio located in Karjat, neighbouring Mumbai.
Last April, director Sam Mendes had visited India with the film's production designer Terry Bamber on location hunting. This is when they firmed up their plans to shoot at the studio. According to reports, the opening sequence of the Daniel Craig starrer will be shot in a three-week spell at the studio, founded by veteran art director Nitin Desai.
The set constructed at the studio depicts main roads, shops, bylanes in the vicinity of the CST Terminus and also the Crawford market.
It is said that the opening sequence will start off with a chase sequence in South Mumbai. The sequence that will also have blowing up of several cars will serve as a right opening to the film.
Directors of Bond films prefer landmark locations for their shoots. Director John Glen shot Octopussy in India in prime venues like The Jag Mandir in Udaipur and Taj Mahal in Agra."
thoughts?
There may be a grain of truth in this after all.
Someone asked this of Terry Bamber on Twitter...
Then provided a link to this story.“James Bond in Mumbai! When you'll arrive in India? September? #Bond23”
To which Bamber responded with...
Not sure yet
Make of that what you will.
#329
Posted 22 June 2011 - 08:36 AM
Further down his Twitter page, he says,
to someone called Tanaaz Bhatia.“See you when I am back on the Bond.”
Tanaaz Bhatia runs a company called Bottomline Media, which is based in Mumbai.
#330
Posted 22 June 2011 - 01:12 PM
and a bit more fuel to the fire from Mr Bamber.
Further down his Twitter page, he says,to someone called Tanaaz Bhatia.“See you when I am back on the Bond.”
Tanaaz Bhatia runs a company called Bottomline Media, which is based in Mumbai.
so perhaps a Mumbai pre title sequence isn't that far off?