Adele's Skyfall (POLL ADDED)
#2431
Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:57 PM
#2432
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:00 PM
Fairly incredibly, the song is already number 1 in iTunes Charts in an astonishing 40 countries!
It hasn't even been released for 24 hours yet, Gordon Bennett! Adele's star power+James Bond= World Domination. Total and complete World Wide domination...
#2433
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:09 PM
https://www.apple.co...s/charts/songs/
#2434
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:21 PM
#2435
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:46 PM
Errrrr, well buy her next solo album then. What we’ve ACTUALLY been waiting for is the new Bond theme which, this time, is sung by Adele. And this fits the bill perfectly. Will look awesome over the title sequence. And I should know because I know these things.
Did any of you seriously think it was going to be a rock song as soon as Adele was announced?
I thought it was at least gonna have some life to it.
So do you think Sheena Easton's FYEO has no life, or MR?
That's besides the point. I wanted to hear an Adele song, and I got Adele singing a generic Bond song.
#2436
Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:59 PM
These are the statistics I saw: http://kworb.net/itunes/adele.htmlWhere do you find iTunes charts? I searched earlier and found some top 10s with no mention of Skyfall; I looked just now and it's at number 2 behind Taylor Swift.
https://www.apple.co...s/charts/songs/
Perhaps some are updating quicker than others.
#2437
Posted 05 October 2012 - 05:22 PM
Fairly incredibly, the song is already number 1 in iTunes Charts in an astonishing 40 countries!
It hasn't even been released for 24 hours yet, Gordon Bennett! Adele's star power+James Bond= World Domination. Total and complete World Wide domination...
#1 across Europe, apparently. Who cares that the UK scores next to "nul points" at Eurovision when we've got a very successful Bond track!
#2438
Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:06 PM
Anyway, definitely 100 times better than the preliminary draft of an incentive try that was QoS's main title song...
#2439
Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:36 PM
#2440
Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:45 PM
#2441
Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:56 PM
On the radio tonight Xfm were having a Bond theme shootout: I heard TWINE vs Another Way To Die put to the vote and the listeners went for AWTD (only about three votes for TWINE, apparently), and after listening to Skyfall on my ipod I've got to say that AWTD just sounded fresher and more interesting, and definitely more powerful.
I feel the same way with SF vs DAD. I'd never thought I'd say this, but I really dug Madge's song after listening to it this afternoon. Everything that Skyfall isn't. Contemporary, innovative, fun, witty, unpredictable and edgy as .
"I'm gonna avoid the cliche."
None of Skyfall's lyrics hit the nail on the head as squarely as that one line.
Love the late Michel Colombier's string writing.
#2442
Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:59 PM
#2443
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:02 PM
On the radio tonight Xfm were having a Bond theme shootout: I heard TWINE vs Another Way To Die put to the vote and the listeners went for AWTD (only about three votes for TWINE, apparently), and after listening to Skyfall on my ipod I've got to say that AWTD just sounded fresher and more interesting, and definitely more powerful.
I feel the same way with SF vs DAD. I'd never thought I'd say this, but I really dug Madge's song after listening to it this afternoon. Everything that Skyfall isn't. Contemporary, innovative, fun, witty, unpredictable and edgy as .
"I'm gonna avoid the cliche."
None of Skyfall's lyrics hit the nail on the head as squarely as that one line.
Love the late Michel Colombier's string writing.
I'm actually agreed with most of that. It was disappointing in the sense that such an odd song was attached to a meaningful Bond 20 / 40th anniversary film, but the tune itself isn't terrible. I've always found it catchy - definitely enjoyed the string part, as well. Dare I say it, hum-able.
I've never understood the lyrical hypocrisy, though, of vocally intending to 'avoid the cliche' and then having 60% of the words be an almost parody-like repetition of the film's title. The sentiment seems to start with "I'm not going to be Shirley Bassey and Don Black," and then, "But I'll make fun of them by being almost exactly Shirley Bassey and Don Black."
#2444
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:05 PM
"But I'll make fun of them by being almost exactly Shirley Bassey and Don Black."
Bassey and Black didn't patent the idea of repeating a song's title again and again.
It works as a Bond anniversary song, because it represents the ever changing nature of the series, the refusal to be complacent, and the fact that nearly all of the "classic" Bond songs were of their time, rarely looking back. In Cubby's words - "two minutes into the future."
#2445
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:08 PM
#2446
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:18 PM
"But I'll make fun of them by being almost exactly Shirley Bassey and Don Black."
Bassey and Black didn't patent the idea of repeating a song's title again and again.
It works as a Bond anniversary song, because it represents the ever changing nature of the series, the refusal to be complacent, and the fact that nearly all of the "classic" Bond songs were of their time, rarely looking back. In Cubby's words - "two minutes into the future."
Valid point. But while Bassey and Black didn't patent the idea, do we not come away with the same impression that Madge is mocking their specific use of it? What other intention would she have in belabouring the phrase the way she does?
#2447
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:29 PM
"But I'll make fun of them by being almost exactly Shirley Bassey and Don Black."
Bassey and Black didn't patent the idea of repeating a song's title again and again.
It works as a Bond anniversary song, because it represents the ever changing nature of the series, the refusal to be complacent, and the fact that nearly all of the "classic" Bond songs were of their time, rarely looking back. In Cubby's words - "two minutes into the future."
Valid point. But while Bassey and Black didn't patent the idea, do we not come away with the same impression that Madge is mocking their specific use of it? What other intention would she have in belabouring the phrase the way she does?
Because the song's meant to be like a chant or some kind of meditative trance as Bond is being tortured. "I'm gonna close my body now."
#2448
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:34 PM
Great orchestra, use of Bond theme and vocals though.
#2449
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:38 PM
Having listened to the song multiple times now i realise the lyrics really are a pile of , barring a couple of lines.
They are that, yeah! There's not much poetry to repeating 'this is the end' only twice; it's just a bit clumsy. And the 'when it crumbles' line really does stick out. 'Crumbles' ain't an elegant word no matter how you look at it!
#2450
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:47 PM
Some of you almost had me convinced that this was a poor song until I heard you anchoring you're argument with AWTD. It is a fine song but c'mon.
Edited by 00Hockey Mask, 05 October 2012 - 07:48 PM.
#2451
Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:47 PM
#2452
Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:09 PM
"But I'll make fun of them by being almost exactly Shirley Bassey and Don Black."
Bassey and Black didn't patent the idea of repeating a song's title again and again.
It works as a Bond anniversary song, because it represents the ever changing nature of the series, the refusal to be complacent, and the fact that nearly all of the "classic" Bond songs were of their time, rarely looking back. In Cubby's words - "two minutes into the future."
Valid point. But while Bassey and Black didn't patent the idea, do we not come away with the same impression that Madge is mocking their specific use of it? What other intention would she have in belabouring the phrase the way she does?
Because the song's meant to be like a chant or some kind of meditative trance as Bond is being tortured. "I'm gonna close my body now."
I can buy that interpretation. Fair enough.
#2453
Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:42 PM
#2454
Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:48 PM
Having listened to the song multiple times now i realise the lyrics really are a pile of , barring a couple of lines.
They are that, yeah! There's not much poetry to repeating 'this is the end' only twice; it's just a bit clumsy. And the 'when it crumbles' line really does stick out. 'Crumbles' ain't an elegant word no matter how you look at it!
" Such a cold finger" isn't a great line either, but it works.
#2455
Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:17 PM
#2456
Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:21 PM
I was a little apprehensive at first when it was announced that Adele was to be the performing artist. I mean she's ok... not exactly my 1st choice; better than most, to be fair.
But once I heard it, all bets were off. It's PERFECT. It struck me as a song that, very well, could have been written for Shirley Bassey. I was taken back to the days of GOLDFINGER, THUNDERBALL & DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER.
If this is what Daniel Craig meant when he said SKYFALL was going to be a "Classic Bond" picture. I think I'm looking forward to it even more than I was this morning.
#2457
Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:23 PM
#2458
Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:59 PM
#2459
Posted 05 October 2012 - 11:44 PM
#2460
Posted 06 October 2012 - 12:23 AM
Bland lyrics. Slightly interesting musically. Dull overall. This is Bond for goodness sake. And at 50. Where is the drama of GF? The swagger of TB? The thrill of LALD?
Agreed on the lyrics.
This is definitely one of the lesser Bond title tracks. From subpar lyrics (does a word as awkward to sing as "crumbles" really need to appear so many times?), to uninspired instrumental work, "Skyfall" is just lacking in almost every department. Plus, and I'm sure this has already been discussed quite a bit, what's up with that horrible background chanting from the second chorus onward?