
Pretty cool, IMO.
Posted 23 August 2009 - 08:42 PM

Posted 25 August 2009 - 03:34 AM
Posted 25 August 2009 - 09:30 AM
Posted 25 August 2009 - 09:30 AM
I found a link from the BBC. It's just a thirty plus second video clip of Shell Cottage:
http://news.bbc.co.u...les/8042668.stm
Posted 29 August 2009 - 09:41 PM
Posted 30 August 2009 - 01:44 PM
According to the filmography on his agents website, Harry Melling is set to reprise his role as Dudley Dursley in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. He will join Richard Griffiths, who plays Vernon Dursley, when the first of the two parts is released on the big screen later next year. As of yet we have received no confirmation that Fiona Shaw will join them as Petunia Dursley.
Posted 30 August 2009 - 05:14 PM
This sixth entry also holds that arrogant air that chooses not to explain vital elements because it assumes everyone knows the books. Well these are not the books. These are meant to be the films which SHOULD operate on a different plateau of storytelling and exposition altogether. For some reason these POTTER films have got themselves in a stale rut and stalemate that always sees the films - and HALF BLOOD PRINCE is no exception - hammock themselves with not explaining what went before and its relevance and assumes nothing else needs explaining at all as the next film will do that. Sorry but that is not good enough.
Posted 04 September 2009 - 03:06 PM
Posted 04 September 2009 - 03:13 PM
Slightly off topic question: Has anyone heard anything about a Harry Potter theme park??? I swear I remember hearing something about it.
Second question: If the rumors are true, will you go???
Posted 04 September 2009 - 03:29 PM
Yes it's true.Slightly off topic question: Has anyone heard anything about a Harry Potter theme park??? I swear I remember hearing something about it.
Second question: If the rumors are true, will you go???
Posted 04 September 2009 - 05:13 PM
Posted 05 September 2009 - 04:09 AM

Posted 05 September 2009 - 11:46 AM
Posted 06 September 2009 - 12:23 AM
Daniel Craig
IS
Mr. Monopoly! ![]()
Posted 20 September 2009 - 02:35 PM
Posted 20 September 2009 - 03:29 PM
complete 8-hour documentary
Posted 20 September 2009 - 03:35 PM
Posted 20 September 2009 - 03:43 PM
Do you think these will get an english release?
Posted 20 September 2009 - 07:10 PM
Posted 24 October 2009 - 02:29 PM
A brand-new Deathly Hallows set report has now appeared online detailing out the events and guests of the wedding at the Burrow between Fleur Delacour (Clemence Poesy) and Bill Weasley (Domhnall Gleeson).
Of "sizeable" note was one of the party's guests, Frances de la Tour, who plays Madame Maxime and last appeared in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. To this point, no mention had been made of her return for Deathly Hallows.
Additionally, the writer notes the "claw marks" across Bill's face (courtesy of Fenrir Greyback) and that George Weasley has a bandage over his missing ear (which Ron has replaced with his own drawing).
Finally, there are plenty of pictures taken of the Burrow set, as well as of random drawings outside of the Lovegood's home and inside Hermione's parents' house. This explains why Michelle Fairley was cast as Mrs. Granger, even though neither she nor Mr. Granger appear in the seventh book. The scene is being shot as a flashback where Emma Watson (Hermione) alters her parents memories.
Posted 24 October 2009 - 03:08 PM
I have finally been able to see the HALF BLOOD PRINCE.
Oh dear. Time is running out for the Potter films to pull a rabbit from the hat and produce a cracking film, and sadly PART 6 is not it at all.
There are a variety of reasons why these Potter films do not work and HALF BLOOD PRINCE demonstrates them throughout. Brilliant flourishes and flashes of visual confidence start proceedings in London town but that scope and urgency is never matched until maybe the last ten minutes of the film. As ever these films stumble over themselves as soon as the always more interesting back story about VOLDEMORT comes into play. The flashback boys should not be better actors and more interesting characters than Potter / Radcliffe himself. But sadly they are - which is one of the series biggest flaws. Another one is that POTTER once again need not even be in the film. This is at least the third film in a row now where his character never once demonstrates he is the "Chosen One" and this great wizard. You barely see him even being a wizard let alone a landmark one. POTTER is never seen being resourceful, knowledgable, inventive or taking command. Radcliffe just autopilots his way through each and every audiobook-with-visuals scene. DUMBLEDORE may comment that POTTER has grown up, but it is a shame the writing and performances haven't. Emma Watson is on superb form as ever - i.e. she thinks rolling her eyes for the benefit of the Mums at the back of the school hall constitutes intuitive acting. She really comes across onscreen as an 'actor' who really thinks she is absolutely stunning. She ain't. Even the usually reliable Rupert Grint is looking a bit bored and honouring a contract he signed when he was 12.
The story of the film is still on 'Parked' and never shifts a gear from that. The amount of redundant scenes in HALF BLOOD PRINCE that do not further the story one bit is quite staggering. And if they do hold any significance we only hear about in the final reel as if MISS MARPLE herself has just returned from London with all the answers that were held off-story throughout. It is wrong that the first scene of consequence (the burning of the Weasleys home) comes after 90 minutes of near to nothing. HALF BLOOD PRINCE is shockingly devoid of narrative consequence. These are not just a badly stitched sequence of scenes for people who have read the book. These are evidence of a film series that has been treading water for three films now for cash cow reasons.
This sixth entry also holds that arrogant air that chooses not to explain vital elements because it assumes everyone knows the books. Well these are not the books. These are meant to be the films which SHOULD operate on a different plateau of storytelling and exposition altogether. For some reason these POTTER films have got themselves in a stale rut and stalemate that always sees the films - and HALF BLOOD PRINCE is no exception - hammock themselves with not explaining what went before and its relevance and assumes nothing else needs explaining at all as the next film will do that. Sorry but that is not good enough.
This is definitely one half baked ponce that potentially marks a new low for the increasingly stagnant series.
Posted 02 December 2009 - 03:34 PM
Posted 02 December 2009 - 11:08 PM
Posted 05 December 2009 - 11:42 AM
Posted 05 December 2009 - 01:46 PM
Posted 05 December 2009 - 01:50 PM
Posted 07 June 2010 - 05:46 PM
Posted 28 June 2010 - 11:24 PM
Posted 29 June 2010 - 02:40 AM
Posted 29 June 2010 - 06:22 AM