It might have been more ruthless than his portrayal of James Bond, but is irrelevant if we are looking to compare with the brutality of the original literary character.
I am not sure why this comparison was brought up. For all intents and purposes we could also bring in Mickey Mouse for discussion.
Let's stick to the point, then. By your own argument, you're implying Hugh Sinclair was more authentic as Simon Templar than Roger Moore, and any of the actors who followed him. To my mind, you're placing too much emphasis on the one aspect; the televisions restrictions. Taken as a whole, I feel Roger Moore was far closer to the Saint than any other actor. ROTS is actually my favourite series, and the one I'm closest too (I'm a big Ogilvy fan), but I just think Moore was near perfect casting.
The literary Saint also changed, or at least evolved. Templar became more refined. This is an important point because, in my view, the later 1950s Templar suited Moore (and the other TV Saints) better than the earlier pre-war Saint.
Thanks for the pictures. I knew nothing about this at all. I hope this features in Ian's LC biography. By the way, does anybody know what car George Sanders drove in The Saint in London?
Edited by St Louis, 01 May 2012 - 12:00 AM.