What about my other questions below?
To those in the know, who is the Simon Templar character from the books?
What is he like? Is he different to the filmed interpretations?
Posted 09 February 2009 - 07:19 PM
To those in the know, who is the Simon Templar character from the books?
What is he like? Is he different to the filmed interpretations?
Posted 09 February 2009 - 08:01 PM
Greg Wise, maybe?Who would be a good future Saint?
Posted 10 February 2009 - 07:07 AM
I'm no Saint expert, but I did catch a bit of an episode the other day which saw Roger battling giant ants!
Posted 10 February 2009 - 11:39 AM
The Saint of the books is far more, irreverent, smart, intelligent, humorous, tough, impatient, law-breaking, murderous, sarcastic, contemptuous, enjoying of Life, easily bored, and Attitude carrying than any of other the screen incarnations put together. I think it is fair to say that there have been but very minor elements of character capturing, but essentially, the further one goes in time, the further they get away from the source. Perhaps it is a difficult role to play - afterall, how does one equate a murderer with someone who sings and creates limericks and poems?To those in the know, who is the Simon Templar character from the books?
What is he like? Is he different to the filmed interpretations?
Sanders to be sure. He got a certain speed and efficiency to his actions, and he was also quite sardonic and contemptuous of the Law and people. He was also helped in that the first of his few films were based on Charteris source material, in the right era and in b/w, but even they very shortly went off the rails. Double Trouble, anyone??Secondly, an acquaintance of mine who knows this character suggests that George Saunders was probably the best Saint.
What do those that know think?
Who was best out of (the principal filmic Saints):
Louis Hayward
George Sanders
Hugh Sinclair
Roger Moore
Ian Ogilivy
Simon Dutton
Val Kilmer?
None of this lot.Who would be a good future Saint?
Hugh Grant
Hugh Jackman
Clive Owen
Pierce Brosnan
Geoffrey Moore
any other?
Posted 10 February 2009 - 12:03 PM
Thanks Simon . Brilliant post.The Saint of the books is far more, irreverent, smart, intelligent, humorous, tough, impatient, law-breaking, murderous, sarcastic, contemptuous, enjoying of Life, easily bored, and Attitude carrying than any of other the screen incarnations put together. I think it is fair to say that there have been but very minor elements of character capturing, but essentially, the further one goes in time, the further they get away from the source. Perhaps it is a difficult role to play - afterall, how does one equate a murderer with someone who sings and creates limericks and poems?To those in the know, who is the Simon Templar character from the books?
What is he like? Is he different to the filmed interpretations?Sanders to be sure. He got a certain speed and efficiency to his actions, and he was also quite sardonic and contemptuous of the Law and people. He was also helped in that the first of his few films were based on Charteris source material, in the right era and in b/w, but even they very shortly went off the rails. Double Trouble, anyone??Secondly, an acquaintance of mine who knows this character suggests that George Saunders was probably the best Saint.
What do those that know think?
Who was best out of (the principal filmic Saints):
Louis Hayward
George Sanders
Hugh Sinclair
Roger Moore
Ian Ogilivy
Simon Dutton
Val Kilmer?None of this lot.Who would be a good future Saint?
Hugh Grant
Hugh Jackman
Clive Owen
Pierce Brosnan
Geoffrey Moore
any other?
I have mentioned in the past that someone of Rupert Everett's ilk would be good. His build and looks are correct, he has a real attitude, he is intelligent and can be really contemptuous. He would have handled the dialogue, irreverency and humorous aspects very well. Not sure how he would have handled the action and guns, but aside from all of that, I am not sure how the marketing people would have been able to handle his orientation.
Otherwise, I am not sure who could play him. An unknown would be best, but it really does need to go back to source material and, even more than Bond, to set him apart, it does need to be period set.
Posted 10 February 2009 - 04:13 PM
Posted 10 February 2009 - 04:21 PM
No. They offered him the opportunity but at his time of life, he'd rather not pursue anything too active or strenuous. But, as with Leslie's widow, he's getting regular updates on all aspects of the production and his comments are being noted.Greg Wise, maybe?Who would be a good future Saint?
Ian, is Bob Baker involved with the new Saint production?
Posted 10 February 2009 - 04:26 PM
Classic - bet he looks forward to his 'comments being noted'.But, as with Leslie's widow, he's getting regular updates on all aspects of the production and his comments are being noted.
Posted 10 February 2009 - 04:37 PM
I approach postings like these with a large sigh, not because I don't want to answer it--in fact far from it. It's just that--as many of my frends and acquaintances can confirm--I can witter on about this sort of subject for hours and hours...To those in the know, who is the Simon Templar character from the books?
What is he like? Is he different to the filmed interpretations?
Secondly, an acquaintance of mine who knows this character suggests that George Saunders was probably the best Saint.
What do those that know think?
Who was best out of (the principal filmic Saints):
Louis Hayward
George Sanders
Hugh Sinclair
Roger Moore
Ian Ogilivy
Simon Dutton
Val Kilmer?
Who would be a good future Saint?
Hugh Grant
Hugh Jackman
Clive Owen
Pierce Brosnan
Geoffrey Moore
any other?
Actually you might be surprised. Bob is Geoffrey's godfather and given that Bill Macdonald is married to Roger Moore's US agent there's very much a family feel to this enterprise/Classic - bet he looks forward to his 'comments being noted'.But, as with Leslie's widow, he's getting regular updates on all aspects of the production and his comments are being noted.
Pretty much as they were for the Kilmer movie??
Posted 10 February 2009 - 04:49 PM
Posted 10 February 2009 - 09:52 PM
Posted 10 February 2009 - 10:18 PM
Don't mind at all...This is all fascinating stuff. Having such an authority on The Saint present is too good an opportunity to miss, so if Mr. Dickerson doesn't mind here's a question I'd like to throw his way.
It was a long time ago, and I was just a lad, but I'm very confident that prior to Return Of The Saint going into production, I read a newspaper article which claimed that the series was going to be called Son Of The Saint and that Patrick Mower was in the frame to star. The fact that the series was going to be called Son Of The Saint is of course well documented, but I've never read anything else about Mower's involvement, or indeed, about any other actor being considered for the role apart from Ogilvy. So my question is - was there any substance at all to the Mower story, or was this just a lazy journalist making up a story about the heartthrob of the day? Was Ogilvy the one and only actor considered?
Edited by Ian Dickerson, 10 February 2009 - 10:19 PM.
Posted 10 February 2009 - 11:02 PM
Sorry for making you sigh, Ian, but thanks for the terrific answer.I approach postings like these with a large sigh, not because I don't want to answer it--in fact far from it. It's just that--as many of my frends and acquaintances can confirm--I can witter on about this sort of subject for hours and hours...To those in the know, who is the Simon Templar character from the books?
What is he like? Is he different to the filmed interpretations?
Secondly, an acquaintance of mine who knows this character suggests that George Saunders was probably the best Saint.
What do those that know think?
Who was best out of (the principal filmic Saints):
Louis Hayward
George Sanders
Hugh Sinclair
Roger Moore
Ian Ogilivy
Simon Dutton
Val Kilmer?
Who would be a good future Saint?
Hugh Grant
Hugh Jackman
Clive Owen
Pierce Brosnan
Geoffrey Moore
any other?
So, in the interests of cutting a long story short here's what the Saint's FAQ has to say about the Saint:
"The Saint is an adventurer, but a gentleman above all else. He reads the paper, eager to find a cause exciting to involve himself in. His moral code is strong, and is motives are also good: he would never hurt, steal from, or kill anyone who doesn't completely deserve it. The Saint is the Robin Hood of modern crime: he robs from the evil and heartless rich, and gives to the wronged and deserving poor--in the process, keeping a percentage for his own expenses. He doesn't work for the law, the government, or anyone else. He is a lone wolf, but he doesn't hesitate to team up or collaborate with anyone, including official agencies, when the need arises. He is also a romantic who believes in the excitement of living. "
"Very little is known about Simon Templar's background, or how he became the Saint. If his origin and circumstances of his youth seem to be shrouded in mystery, it is because he chooses not to reveal it. He has a great sense of humor as well as a great zest for life. He is well-to-do, well dressed, drives fast cars, goes to the best places with the most attractive girls, all without any visible means of support.
The police, particularly Chief Inspector Claud Eustace Teal, have their own ideas about the sources of his apparent wealth and for years have been unsuccessfully trying to prove it.
But behind the Saint's sophisticated facade there is a very different man.
Had he lived in the Middle Ages you would see him as a knight in shining amour--a Sir Lancelot, a Robin Hood, a Don Juan, or in the great western tradition, a one man vigilante.
His enemy is not so much crime, but injustice. His impetus, the plight of the innocent soul in need of a patron Saint.
In achieving his objectives he can be cold, hard and always independent. Behind the casual banter there is always the aura of a coiled spring. Hating violence, he will not only turn the other cheek he will turn it so fast that all you are going to hit is the wall you thought he was up against.
Simon Templar faces doom with a cavalier disdain. Yet this is not to say he isn't in constant jeopardy. For if he moves in dangerous places and is himself, the most dangerous of men, he is nonetheless only a man. Mortal.
His adventures have been documented in books, films, radio shows, comic strips and television series. "
I think everyone who's played the Saint has been a Saint for their time. Personally I grew up watching the Ogilvy series so for me he'll always be the Saint, whereas Roger will always be Bond. But they all have their good points and bad points--although for some, like Jean Marais, you may struggle to find many good points.
As for future Saints. Well Pierce Brosnan would have been ideal casting just after the end of Remington Steele. As for now, I dunno....I tend to think of actors such as Ioan Gruffudd, but we'll see.
Ian
Posted 11 February 2009 - 12:16 AM
Posted 11 February 2009 - 12:32 AM
Don't mind at all...
Whilst doing the documentaries for Network both Ian Ogilvy and Bob Baker told me--independantly of each other--that it was Ian's role in Upstairs Downstairs that got Bob to thinking that if he ever did the Saint again, Ian was the man for the job. And since Ian's stint in UpDown was in 1972 I'd have to say it was a seriously lazy journalist at work there...
On a similiar note I do have an article from what I think was the Mail on Sunday in the early 80s--when Bob and Roger Moore were trying to get a period Saint into production, which looks at such likely candidates as Christopher Reeve, Ian Charleson and some bloke called Pierce Brosnan...
Ian
Posted 11 February 2009 - 07:46 AM
No. Bob and Roger had met Pierce Brosnan and had the financing come through he would have been the lead...Don't mind at all...
Whilst doing the documentaries for Network both Ian Ogilvy and Bob Baker told me--independantly of each other--that it was Ian's role in Upstairs Downstairs that got Bob to thinking that if he ever did the Saint again, Ian was the man for the job. And since Ian's stint in UpDown was in 1972 I'd have to say it was a seriously lazy journalist at work there...
On a similiar note I do have an article from what I think was the Mail on Sunday in the early 80s--when Bob and Roger Moore were trying to get a period Saint into production, which looks at such likely candidates as Christopher Reeve, Ian Charleson and some bloke called Pierce Brosnan...
Ian
Much obliged to you. I guess the newspapers weren't any more reliable in the 70s than they are now. I remember the plans for a period Saint well. It's such a shame this didn't happen. I've got an old video magazine from '84 that suggests Christopher Cazenove was the favoured candidate. I guess this wasn't true either.
Posted 11 February 2009 - 03:28 PM
Posted 11 February 2009 - 08:33 PM
Whilst doing the documentaries for Network both Ian Ogilvy and Bob Baker told me--independantly of each other--that it was Ian's role in Upstairs Downstairs that got Bob to thinking that if he ever did the Saint again, Ian was the man for the job.
Posted 11 February 2009 - 10:42 PM
Tough one for me if I agree or not. I own a Volvo 1800, but I also have 3 Jags. Clearly the Jag XJS is technically a better car, but I think I like the design of the 1800 better.Plus he had the coolest car- no question: beats that Volvo out of the park.
Posted 12 February 2009 - 10:15 AM
Posted 15 February 2009 - 06:16 PM
Posted 15 February 2009 - 07:05 PM
Posted 15 February 2009 - 09:36 PM
No. The idea of giving the Saint a son has been around for a long time. Leslie Charteris offered it in a storyline to Paramount in the late 1980s but they decided to go their own route.On some other notes, I thought that Son of The Saint was once intended to be a movie sequel to the TV series.
Ah yes. Michael French. That idea was complete and utter hogwash and not only were the Charteris Estate never approached, neither was Michael French apparently.Also, I read (on saint.org?) a couple of years ago that an actor from Eastenders was being considered for the role. It was mentioned that The Saint would use virtual reality and work for the Governement
Yes. The first three drafts of what became the Kilmer movie were by Terry Hayes and had a strong Russian element to them.Also, I read in an interview (with the screenwriter of Kilmer's Saint?), where it was mentioned that the ditched draft had a hunt for the Holy Grail with the Cossacks as the good guys.
James Dearden's script. Which was quite good I thought. Which is probably why it got ditched so quickly.Another "also" - Ralph Fiennes was one of the actors to whom the movie was proposed (previously to Kilmer) and he mentions fast cars and - Swiss banks.
Edited by Ian Dickerson, 15 February 2009 - 10:41 PM.
Posted 01 April 2009 - 01:06 PM
Posted 01 April 2009 - 02:49 PM
We did try and interest them in more Rhys shows at the time but they didn't want to know. We've also tried--again with Radio 4--last year, but everyone's waiting to see what happens with the TV Saint.The three Paul Rhys Radio Four adaptations from the mid-nineties probably come the closest for me, being faithful to the early stories, strong on period atmosphere and with a nicely debonair yet slightly unhinged performance from the lead - too bad more weren't produced.
Despite how awful the proposed pilot from last year sounded, the casting of Purefoy was interesting to say the least.
Posted 01 April 2009 - 03:25 PM
Talking of which...we should be able to confirm details of the new pilot in a few weeks. Just need to sort out some contracual bits and pieces but we have a leading man, and he's good...very good...
Ian
Posted 01 April 2009 - 05:33 PM
The three Paul Rhys Radio Four adaptations from the mid-nineties probably come the closest for me, being faithful to the early stories, strong on period atmosphere and with a nicely debonair yet slightly unhinged performance from the lead - too bad more weren't produced.
We did try and interest them in more Rhys shows at the time but they didn't want to know. We've also tried--again with Radio 4--last year
Posted 02 April 2009 - 01:21 AM
Talking of which...we should be able to confirm details of the new pilot in a few weeks. Just need to sort out some contracual bits and pieces but we have a leading man, and he's good...very good...
Ian
Posted 02 April 2009 - 01:23 PM
We did try and interest them in more Rhys shows at the time but they didn't want to know. We've also tried--again with Radio 4--last year, but everyone's waiting to see what happens with the TV Saint.The three Paul Rhys Radio Four adaptations from the mid-nineties probably come the closest for me, being faithful to the early stories, strong on period atmosphere and with a nicely debonair yet slightly unhinged performance from the lead - too bad more weren't produced.
Despite how awful the proposed pilot from last year sounded, the casting of Purefoy was interesting to say the least.
Talking of which...we should be able to confirm details of the new pilot in a few weeks. Just need to sort out some contracual bits and pieces but we have a leading man, and he's good...very good...
Ian
Edited by Peckinpah1976, 02 April 2009 - 01:23 PM.
Posted 02 April 2009 - 06:32 PM