
The Expendables (2009)
#91
Posted 13 March 2009 - 07:50 AM
#92
Posted 13 March 2009 - 11:44 AM
Two more cast members, though frankly they aren't too exciting - the WWE star Stone Cold Steve Austin, and Charisma Carpenter, some tv actress who used to be on Buffy the vampire slayer. Bit of a drop in star power after Sandra Bullock turned it down, eh!
Don't know Stone Cold, but I've checked out CC's photo. Ouch! With all the testosterone raging about, the Babe Factor was needed. Competing for her...attention may help light the big boys' fires.
#93
Posted 15 March 2009 - 05:44 PM
#94
Posted 16 March 2009 - 11:58 AM
#95
Posted 16 March 2009 - 08:39 PM
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40413
I don't know what he thinks he's playing at with that goatee, though.
#96
Posted 18 March 2009 - 11:23 AM
#97
Posted 18 March 2009 - 04:18 PM
#98
Posted 18 March 2009 - 08:01 PM
"Liam Hemsworth (offered a significant role in The Expendables after Sly Stallone saw his tape)"
A quick trip to the imdb reveals that he is an alumni of, er, Neighbours (hey, well so is Guy Pearce!) and has a part in Knowing. Other than that, not much to go on.
And, start your countdowns now...the release date has been announced : April 23rd 2010
#99
Posted 18 March 2009 - 08:50 PM
Yet another casting titbit, actually I found this in an article about potential Thor candidates :
"Liam Hemsworth (offered a significant role in The Expendables after Sly Stallone saw his tape)"
A quick trip to the imdb reveals that he is an alumni of, er, Neighbours (hey, well so is Guy Pearce!) and has a part in Knowing. Other than that, not much to go on.
And, start your countdowns now...the release date has been announced : April 23rd 2010
Thank you for the update. In ten more days the lens is loosed on history in the making.
#100
Posted 18 March 2009 - 09:37 PM
#101
Posted 18 March 2009 - 11:54 PM
I'm still rather baffled by everyone's enthusiasm for THE EXPENDABLES. Where were you lot when Sly was making action movies in the '90s?
Well I was there, dude. Cliffhanger, Judge Dredd, Demolition Man, Assassins, The Specıalıst...saw 'em all on the big screen!
But I think one of the reasons people are getting behind The Expendables is because the action genre is in the toilet at the moment. Every movie out there with even a trace of action in it is either based on a comic, a videogame, is a remake, or is some other kind of CGI rubbish where the "star" dangles around on wires in front of a green screen. That ain't "action" where I come from. Look at some of the effeminate man-boys who have starred in "action" films lately - Shia Labeouf, Hayden Christensen, James McAvoy, Pierce B...er, whoops. Anyway, this all adds up to people being excited to see the return of some REAL action, led by the man whos been doing it for three decades now.
#102
Posted 19 March 2009 - 10:25 AM
That said, though, I'm still surprised by the huge wave of goodwill for THE EXPENDABLES. I mean, it's not as though RAMBO was exactly universally loved (or even that big a hit). I guess Dolph Lundgren and Mickey Rourke are more exciting names than I'd imagined.
It'll be interesting to see how well THE EXPENDABLES does at the box office. The buzz alone should push it above $100 million in the States (which neither ROCKY BALBOA nor RAMBO achieved).
#103
Posted 19 March 2009 - 10:53 AM
Good point. And even when Harrison Ford and Bruce Willis ("real men", I guess) did their recent action comebacks, it was thought necessary to pair them with "effeminate man-boys".
Ah yes. I wonder if it was assumed by the studios that teens wouldn't be interested unless there was someone in it they could, like, totally relate to. Thankfully Sly hasn't gone in for any of that nonsense...or has he? Because today's news is Whitaker out...Fiddy Cent in! Straight from Sly himself :
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40487
Also of interest, Mickey Rourke's character is named 'Tool'. Er, fair enough.

#104
Posted 19 March 2009 - 11:17 AM

#105
Posted 19 March 2009 - 11:32 AM
Good point. And even when Harrison Ford and Bruce Willis ("real men", I guess) did their recent action comebacks, it was thought necessary to pair them with "effeminate man-boys".
That said, though, I'm still surprised by the huge wave of goodwill for THE EXPENDABLES. I mean, it's not as though RAMBO was exactly universally loved (or even that big a hit). I guess Dolph Lundgren and Mickey Rourke are more exciting names than I'd imagined.
It'll be interesting to see how well THE EXPENDABLES does at the box office. The buzz alone should push it above $100 million in the States (which neither ROCKY BALBOA nor RAMBO achieved).
I dunno about Dolph, but Mickey is. Eric Roberts has a pretty decent straight to video fan base--he must've turned out a hundred of those. Aside from the Real Action angle itself, I think a lot of the buzz has to do with second chances--a group of expendable mercenaries p;layed by actors in need of Just One Lucky Break. Plus the beefcake angle, which served 300 so well. Finally, this film has, imo, an aura of Real Deal about it. Go, Sly.
#106
Posted 20 March 2009 - 03:49 PM
No PG-13 rating, no attempts at 'character development' just mindless (and enjoyable) carnage. Most of the cast for the upcoming film, alongside Stallone, were all stars during that period(alongside newer names like Statham and Austin) and it's pretty much a statement to the newer generation of action films/stars that the REAL tough guys are back in business.
The thing is it probably will be complete crap and yet some ppl(of a certain age) will take it to their hearts.
#107
Posted 21 March 2009 - 02:43 PM
The main reason people are enthusiastic about THE EXPENDABLES is pure nostalgia for the time(the 80s to early 90s) when action movies simply meant R-rated macho, jingoistic gorefests.
No PG-13 rating, no attempts at 'character development' just mindless (and enjoyable) carnage. Most of the cast for the upcoming film, alongside Stallone, were all stars during that period(alongside newer names like Statham and Austin) and it's pretty much a statement to the newer generation of action films/stars that the REAL tough guys are back in business.
The thing is it probably will be complete crap and yet some ppl(of a certain age) will take it to their hearts.
I agree with you about the nostalgic appeal. But I think you're underestimating the draw of the casting itself. If Sly can keep all those egos in line, I think we'll see a film that's far more than 'complete crap'? I'll wait till I've seen some footage before feeling any alarm.
#108
Posted 21 March 2009 - 04:22 PM
#109
Posted 21 March 2009 - 08:53 PM
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40516
I don't know much about him, but he has a decent action resume, and isn't a rapper, so that's nice.
#110
Posted 21 March 2009 - 10:52 PM
Terry Crews is a good choice anyways. Not only is he a great comedy actor (he's on "Everybody Hate's Chris), but he's pretty good at drama too.
#111
Posted 22 March 2009 - 09:20 AM
#112
Posted 22 March 2009 - 05:24 PM
#113
Posted 24 March 2009 - 08:53 PM
A Tango & Cash reunion occurred to Sylvester Stallone when he was putting together The Expendables. His upcoming mercenary flick that will begin shooting later this spring already features Jet Li, Jason Statham, Stallone (of course), Mickey Rourke, Dolph Lundgren, and about a half dozen others, and Sly had been holding out hope that Kurt Russell would join in the fun.
I don't know how there could possibly be room for one more speaking part in the film, but The Italian Stallion wrote to the fansite StalloneZone to let everyone know it wouldn't be happening. What's interesting is not that Russell passed but the hoops Stallone says he had to jump through just to hear that Russell wasn't interested.
"I know that many people on the site have asked for Kurt Russell. I asked for him too. Actually, I was taken aback when asked to put the request in a letter and send it to his agent. Subsequently, I was called back by the agent several days later after refusing to send a letter and he said Kurt Russell is not interested in 'ensemble acting' at this time. So, people, I came, I saw, I failed."
source: http://www.getthebig...xpendables.html
#114
Posted 24 March 2009 - 09:25 PM
#115
Posted 25 March 2009 - 11:29 AM
Interesting. What else has Kurt got in his plate, really? Its not as if Grindhouse gave him a Travolta-esque comeback. (He doesn't seem to have ANY stuff in the pipeline if imdb is any indication). Oh well, you win some, you lose some.
Real bad move in his part, I'd say. But I was thinking last night that this may be for the best. I like him just fine as an actor and have enjoyed a few of his action films--but I've never considered him to be an action star. Not like Stallone. Kurt always seemed to be playing at it. For Sly's purposes, the casting as is may be just about perfect.
#116
Posted 07 April 2009 - 09:10 PM
http://twitter.com/marialascala
#117
Posted 08 April 2009 - 12:14 AM
What is the budget estimated to be on this film?
I estimate it to be one million pounds...of testosterone.
#118
Posted 08 April 2009 - 11:15 AM
What is the budget estimated to be on this film?
I estimate it to be one million pounds...of testosterone.
LOL
#119
Posted 08 April 2009 - 11:37 AM
What is the budget estimated to be on this film?
I doubt we're talking megabudget by Hollywood standards. RAMBO (2008) is said to have cost $50 million, and I imagine it's a similar, perhaps slightly higher, figure for THE EXPENDABLES.
Stallone is no longer a box office giant. ROCKY BALBOA and RAMBO were only moderate hits in the United States, and no one's gonna give him a blank cheque.
#120
Posted 09 April 2009 - 11:14 AM
What is the budget estimated to be on this film?
I doubt we're talking megabudget by Hollywood standards. RAMBO (2008) is said to have cost $50 million, and I imagine it's a similar, perhaps slightly higher, figure for THE EXPENDABLES.
Stallone is no longer a box office giant. ROCKY BALBOA and RAMBO were only moderate hits in the United States, and no one's gonna give him a blank cheque.
You're probably right on this. I'm wondering about the salaries then: Rourke's part is small and it's said he took the role as a favor to Sly. Do you think the others are paid whatever the minimum is?