Indeed...Indeed. Well written my friend. Personally, as revolvers go, the classic Colt Mk. IV .357 with the simple four inch barrel is both concealable and controlable but packs a punch similar to some of the smaller frame .44's and you can shoot .38 in a pinch.
As the old quote goes: "God created all men equal...Sam Colt kept 'em even."
On the more modern front, for the "pick up a 400-pound gorilla off his feet" effect, the Charter Arms Bulldog .44 snub with Talons or Glasers can stop an elephant as well as the gorilla.
or a sub-compact car.
Granted, you're limited to only five rounds, but the double-action is smooth and the single lethal. Nice control.
Problem with the Sig fitted with a silencer: Too damn long. Let us not forget the end of the novel FRWL. It's a fine pistol, but with the silencer looks like a snag waiting to happen unless you've got a scabbard break-away rig or already have it out and ready to go.
Then again, the same can be said of any pistol fitted with a silencer.
While I doubt many would disagree about the Colt, the CA Bulldog quality is just too hit or miss in my opinion. I know guys who've shot the hell out of them and they're still running and seen pieces that should have never made it out the factory.
Personally I think if Bond carried a concealed revolver these days it would still be the one Boothroyd suggested. An airweight centennial is a wonderful gun and the lswchp +P FBI load is a proven round. I won't get into over/under penetration talk concerning Glasers as it's going way OT.
Have I mentioned a 642 is my usual everyday carry?
Am I the only one who prefers the P99. It looks a lot cooler and plus the PPK just has a wimpy look to it, as if a pellet gun packs more punch. I would like Bond to use a bigger kind of gun. It isn't impoossible to conceal a Colt .45 or a Beretta M9, what about a USP .45?
All I'll say about H&K is, "Because I Suck, And They Hate Me"
Unless it's a P7... then all bets are off.