The eyebrows, that is...

Posted 18 February 2009 - 10:29 PM
Posted 04 March 2009 - 09:25 PM
Posted 04 March 2009 - 09:50 PM
Posted 05 March 2009 - 02:06 AM
Posted 05 March 2009 - 03:12 AM
Plenty of Fleming material has been used and updated. Just because the source may be a bit dated, that doesn't mean that it can't be effective in a modern script. And being grounded in present time does not always produce the best results, does it? Moonraker springs to mind as a perfect example of that.Including Fleming material simply because it hasn't been included yet or for the sake of it would have to rate as one of the worst moves EON could make. Bond films have always been grounded in the present time, andso to include something simply because it can be included would waste hat material that could be better served in a more appropriate space and time.
Posted 05 March 2009 - 04:52 AM
That's still no reason for including it simply because it hasn't been included. It's almost as if the producers would be obligated to have it in there, and that may not necessarily be the best thing for Bond. I think they should wait until they can work it into a story that calls for it rather than build a story around it.Plenty of Fleming material has been used and updated. Just because the source may be a bit dated, that doesn't mean that it can't be effective in a modern script. And being grounded in present time does not always produce the best results, does it? Moonraker springs to mind as a perfect example of that.Including Fleming material simply because it hasn't been included yet or for the sake of it would have to rate as one of the worst moves EON could make. Bond films have always been grounded in the present time, andso to include something simply because it can be included would waste hat material that could be better served in a more appropriate space and time.
Posted 05 March 2009 - 10:17 AM
Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:21 AM
Ooo! Very apt. I approve. Retro to the point it's "now" (!).http://justjared.buz...le-gq-magazine/
I definately think this woman should in Bond 23..couldnt find the other thread for future bond girls..
Posted 09 March 2009 - 07:45 AM
Albert R. Broccoli's EON Productions Presents
DANIEL CRAIG
as Ian Fleming's James Bond
in
THE NATURE OF EVIL
Posted 09 March 2009 - 09:23 AM
Posted 13 March 2009 - 03:17 AM
Posted 13 March 2009 - 03:19 AM
Posted 13 March 2009 - 03:46 AM
Posted 13 March 2009 - 03:51 AM
Ooo! Very apt. I approve. Retro to the point it's "now" (!).http://justjared.buz...le-gq-magazine/
I definately think this woman should in Bond 23..couldnt find the other thread for future bond girls..
Posted 21 March 2009 - 10:58 AM
That's still no reason for including it simply because it hasn't been included. It's almost as if the producers would be obligated to have it in there, and that may not necessarily be the best thing for Bond. I think they should wait until they can work it into a story that calls for it rather than build a story around it.
Edited by Eurospy, 21 March 2009 - 10:58 AM.
Posted 25 March 2009 - 09:28 AM
Posted 26 March 2009 - 10:40 PM
http://justjared.buz...le-gq-magazine/
I definately think this woman should in Bond 23..couldnt find the other thread for future bond girls..
Posted 27 March 2009 - 11:07 PM
Posted 01 April 2009 - 02:58 AM
Posted 01 April 2009 - 01:49 PM
Okay, I've been thinking about something for a while now, and I think I havea solution. I'm a huge fan of Formula One and have been for some time. I think the glamour and the spectacle would be perfect for Bond, but I've been hard-pressed to find a way that it could be convincingly worked into the story. Having Bond drive one of the cars would be stupid, because the drivers have been going since childhood in getting to the upper levels of the competition. And we couldn't have Bond listening in on the bad guys from the anonymity of the grandstands, because something like that was done in QUANTUM OF SOLACE. But I think I now have the perfect idea for it. Please excuse the fact that this is going to require some backstory, but all of it is relevant.
In 2008, Honda withdrew from Formula One, citing the global economic situation as their reasons, but it was altogether unsurprising given their lacklustre performance over the previous two seasons. The importan part came at the beginning of 2007.
In 2004, Honda's Jenson Button finished third in the driver's championship. And while 2005 wasn't as good, he also took the team's maiden - and only - victory at Hungary in 2006. In short, Honda were establishing themselves as a competitive team. They also decided to end their association with the Lucky Strike brand, and were looking for a new sponsor. By rights, they should have been at the top of any prospective sponsor's shortlist of teams to lend thier name to.
But for some reason, Honda never found a sponsor. Instead, they unveiled their car as being environmentally-themed and sponsor-free. Their press releases really hyped things up, and the concept was given considrable media attention. But the car was downright terrible, and all the publicity couldn't gloss over the fact that something was fundamentally wrong at Honda. They had been unable to secure a sponsor, and with no sponsor, there was no funding. To make mattes worse, they had painted themselves into a corner: they could never adopt a real sponsor again because it would admit that they were in trouble and that their "Earth Dreams" concept was insincere. They had essentially committed competitive suicide, and it was only a matter of time before they withdrew. Even the brilliance of Ross Brawn - Michael Schumacher's old tactician - couldn't help them. On December 5th last year, Honda officially pulled out of Formula One.
In an interesting quirk of fate, Honda are now back where they should have been two years ago. Ross Brawn purchased the team and rebranded it Brawn Gran Prix. Over the past four days, all ten Formula One teams have been in Barcelona, participating in the last official tests before the season begins in a few weeks. Brawn's cars have topped the time sheets consistently, with a complete reversal of fortunes. They're faster than Ferrari and McLaren, the powerhouses of Grand Prix racing. They've gone from nothing to everything in just two months (in truth, Brawn began developing their car very early in the 2008 season - when they were still known as Honda - and thus have got a significant advantage).
Now, here's where the Bond element comes in: the film would revolve around Bond tracking down someone like a drug dealer or a money launderer. Although he catches the man in the PTS using his wits, the villain escapes on a technicality and only does a short stint in prison. As soon as he's out, he's back in the game. As this is happening, a privately-owned Formula One team's success nose-dived once the villain was arrested. With their bugets of hundred of millions of dollars, it is easy to slip dirty money about, especially considering that the Formula One World Championship goes all over the world. And with the team being the laughing stock of the grid - underfunded, undertalented, etc. - no-one suspects they are a front for dirty dealing.
Posted 27 May 2009 - 09:39 AM
For someone who claims to know all about the workings of Eon Productions, you appear to know very little. You have also clearly never met a single employee from Eon Productions, or certainly not anyone who worked with them for any amount of time.The best thing that could happen to the franchise would be to get rid of Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson. They are bean counters who impose creative controls that they are not qualified to make. Wilson has been wrecking the Bonds for a long time, and now Babs is out to outwreck her stepbrother. They know how to organize and administrate, but they don't nothing about the creative disciplines, and they have no talent for writing, directing, or acting. They are the worst enemy of the series.
Get rid of them!
Richard
Posted 27 May 2009 - 11:18 AM
Posted 27 May 2009 - 11:29 AM
Eon must do the following:
Get rid of Craig. Americans have rejected him. ]
Posted 27 May 2009 - 11:30 AM
My BOND 23 ideas? I don't work for Eon, true, but, as a fan, I have the advantage of being able to see the wood for the trees.
Eon must do the following:
Get rid of Craig. Americans have rejected him. Sure, his films have done okay internationally, but the Stateside box office is still the most important and prestigious, and, cousin, Craig ain't no Brosnan.
Bring back some humour. What is this, the cinematic equivalent of Joy Division's "Unknown Pleasures"? Get Moneypenny and Q back into the mix and let's have, y'know, some laughs. And let's get Bond laid every so often, huh?
Stop ripping off Bourne. Start making films where you can actually follow the plot, and if that's too much hassle then at least let's be able to follow the action scenes.
The gunbarrel. It goes at the beginning. Sheesh, it isn't exactly rocket science.
Title song by a mainstream artist like Leona Lewis. Let's sell some frickin' CDs here! Enough of these "alternative" acts like Chris Cornell and Jack White who don't appeal to anyone other than students.
Posted 27 May 2009 - 11:37 AM
And bring back DRUNKEN MAN WHO LOOKS AGHAST AT WINE BOTTLE....!My BOND 23 ideas? I don't work for Eon, true, but, as a fan, I have the advantage of being able to see the wood for the trees.
Eon must do the following:
Get rid of Craig. Americans have rejected him. Sure, his films have done okay internationally, but the Stateside box office is still the most important and prestigious, and, cousin, Craig ain't no Brosnan.
Bring back some humour. What is this, the cinematic equivalent of Joy Division's "Unknown Pleasures"? Get Moneypenny and Q back into the mix and let's have, y'know, some laughs. And let's get Bond laid every so often, huh?
Stop ripping off Bourne. Start making films where you can actually follow the plot, and if that's too much hassle then at least let's be able to follow the action scenes.
The gunbarrel. It goes at the beginning. Sheesh, it isn't exactly rocket science.
Title song by a mainstream artist like Leona Lewis. Let's sell some frickin' CDs here! Enough of these "alternative" acts like Chris Cornell and Jack White who don't appeal to anyone other than students.
Bring back Burly Chassis to sing a Bond theme.
Get Sir Sean Connery to either play Bond one last time OR the villain.
Bring back Blofeld.
Posted 27 May 2009 - 11:52 AM
Posted 27 May 2009 - 02:24 PM
Eon must do the following:
Get rid of Craig. Americans have rejected him. ]
And your reasoning for that is based on what...?
Posted 27 May 2009 - 02:31 PM
Posted 27 May 2009 - 02:32 PM