
But Earl Grey is THE proper tea indeed.
Posted 01 December 2008 - 11:02 PM
Posted 02 December 2008 - 08:13 AM
Posted 02 December 2008 - 09:38 AM
Posted 02 December 2008 - 12:57 PM
APOCALYSE BOND:
Bond ventures into the Karpalov Tract, a no-man's land in the former USSR states of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. The boundary between these two countries is disputed, and for good reason: Karpalov is a wasteland that neither country wants, but which someone has to take responsibility for. It contains a ghost city, built fifty years previously by the Soviets to test the effects of nuclear warheads against cities (ie, if one were detonated nearby). It is irradiated beyond measure, and some environmentalists rate it as the most contaminated site on the face of the planet; so much so that to spend an hour within the city limits without protection is enough to kill a man (Google Lake Karachay and you'll see what I based it on).
Bond has two objectives: firstly, to determine whether or not another Double-Oh Agent is a danger to himself and others. This agent was dispatched to infiltrate a terrorist cell looking to gather materials to construct a dirty bomb, but the agent's repeated failure to report in and complete his mission lead M to suspect that he has broken under the stress and possibly turned. Bond's second objective is to eliminate the agent if he has indeed cracked (which he has). It is implied that the agent Bond has been sent to kill has a similar backstory to Bond himself, but with a few minor alterations. In essence, he is a mirror image of Bond, and a representation of a potential future for Double-Oh Seven. Bond kills him, but takes no solace in it, and the film ends with him wondering whether someone will come for him in the same way in the future and how he will face such an outcome.
Posted 02 December 2008 - 02:51 PM
APOCALYSE BOND:
Bond ventures into the Karpalov Tract, a no-man's land in the former USSR states of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. The boundary between these two countries is disputed, and for good reason: Karpalov is a wasteland that neither country wants, but which someone has to take responsibility for. It contains a ghost city, built fifty years previously by the Soviets to test the effects of nuclear warheads against cities (ie, if one were detonated nearby). It is irradiated beyond measure, and some environmentalists rate it as the most contaminated site on the face of the planet; so much so that to spend an hour within the city limits without protection is enough to kill a man (Google Lake Karachay and you'll see what I based it on).
Bond has two objectives: firstly, to determine whether or not another Double-Oh Agent is a danger to himself and others. This agent was dispatched to infiltrate a terrorist cell looking to gather materials to construct a dirty bomb, but the agent's repeated failure to report in and complete his mission lead M to suspect that he has broken under the stress and possibly turned. Bond's second objective is to eliminate the agent if he has indeed cracked (which he has). It is implied that the agent Bond has been sent to kill has a similar backstory to Bond himself, but with a few minor alterations. In essence, he is a mirror image of Bond, and a representation of a potential future for Double-Oh Seven. Bond kills him, but takes no solace in it, and the film ends with him wondering whether someone will come for him in the same way in the future and how he will face such an outcome.
Another fine idea has been added to this thread. "James Bond meets Heart of Darkness" sounds like something perfect for the Craig-Bond.![]()
Although I'd rather wait a couple of movies more until we had yet another rogu agent.
Posted 02 December 2008 - 09:07 PM
Posted 02 December 2008 - 09:45 PM
Posted 02 December 2008 - 09:48 PM
Thanks, guys. I don't think EON would make it though - even if I were their lead writer - given the similarities to APOCALYPSE NOW. When I wrote it, I had two major ideas in mind: namely that it is what we cannot see or understand that frightens us the most, which I represented with the idea that Karpalov is uninhabitable because of the contamination; and that even good people can go bad sometimes, something which Bond cannot understand.
I don't think the person Bond has been sent to kill is really a traitor, though. He didn't actively make te decision to do so like Alec Trevalyan, nor was he coerced into it like Vesper Lynd. I see him as being an American agent sent in to detain or kill a group of Quantum members, only to learn one of them is his sister. He almost lets her escape, but at the last moment he pulls the trigger, ending her life not because she works for Quantum, but in the interests of self-preservation because letting her go would make him look culpable. He told no-one about it, and his next assignment was a deep-cover one with a group of ultra-radical domestic "freedom fighters", the Timothy McVeighs of this world; the kind of people who believe the UN is preparing to launch an invasion of America, and that the US government is doing nothing about it, so they take matters into their own hands. The agent go in with them, but over time it became too difficult where his cover ended and the real man began. Felix Leiter approaches M looking to have Bond sent in after this agent as a favour, because the CIA cannot kill American citizens (a bit of a dig at Jason Bourne). M is hesitant at first, because it's an American problem and should be dealt with by the Americas, but in the end Felix convinces her to send Bond in.
Posted 03 December 2008 - 07:54 AM
Actually I don't want to write for EON at all. I probably would if they asked me to, but it's not something I'm given to pursuing. There are two reasons why: firstly, because Bond has been a huge part of my growing-up, and I love finding out everything when I see the film. Being a part of the creative process would kind of kill that for me. Secondly, I actually like a lot of the ideas I come up with, and have designs on becoming a writer of my own work. I honestly don't think I could do Ian Fleming justice.From previous posts of yours, you seem have your sights in becoming a Bond writer.
Posted 03 December 2008 - 09:12 AM
Actually I don't want to write for EON at all. I probably would if they asked me to, but it's not something I'm given to pursuing. There are two reasons why: firstly, because Bond has been a huge part of my growing-up, and I love finding out everything when I see the film. Being a part of the creative process would kind of kill that for me. Secondly, I actually like a lot of the ideas I come up with, and have designs on becoming a writer of my own work. I honestly don't think I could do Ian Fleming justice.From previous posts of yours, you seem have your sights in becoming a Bond writer.
Posted 03 December 2008 - 09:51 AM
No, I mean I want to be a professional screenwriter - problem is that I don't want to be writing for HOME AND AWAY or NEIGHBOURS fr the rest of my life, but if I were in America I'd be comepting with people who do entire university degrees on the practice when I do just six months' work - and if I were one and they asked me to, I might consider it. But if I pursue a career in screenwriting, writing a Bond film is not going to be one of my objectives. If I were like Paul Haggis and they asked me to come on-board for them, then maybe ... but I'm not going to actively seek out working for EON.Er, again, not wanting to burst your bubble at all, far and away from it, but I don't think they'll ever ask anyone "just" because one has great ideas, no matter how great they are.
Even if one does play a bit hard to get(well, it did work for Forster and Faulks, but those are solid drama professionals).
Posted 03 December 2008 - 10:22 AM
No, I mean I want to be a professional screenwriter - problem is that I don't want to be writing for HOME AND AWAY or NEIGHBOURS fr the rest of my life, but if I were in America I'd be comepting with people who do entire university degrees on the practice when I do just six months' work - and if I were one and they asked me to, I might consider it. But if I pursue a career in screenwriting, writing a Bond film is not going to be one of my objectives. If I were like Paul Haggis and they asked me to come on-board for them, then maybe ... but I'm not going to actively seek out working for EON.Er, again, not wanting to burst your bubble at all, far and away from it, but I don't think they'll ever ask anyone "just" because one has great ideas, no matter how great they are.
Even if one does play a bit hard to get(well, it did work for Forster and Faulks, but those are solid drama professionals).
Posted 06 December 2008 - 03:46 AM
Edited by Cilogy, 06 December 2008 - 04:08 AM.
Posted 06 December 2008 - 01:15 PM
Posted 06 December 2008 - 09:20 PM
Posted 07 December 2008 - 03:49 AM
How about a villain that is only Bond's adversary by circumstance? Rather than hating each other from the outset, Bond and the villain are forced into combat with one another, when normally they'd be very friendly to one another. I'm not talking about someone like Alec Trevalyan, who was Bond's best friend until he turned, but rather someone with whom Bond has a mutual respect, and would probably be good friends with them if circumstances were different.
Posted 07 December 2008 - 04:55 AM
How about a villain that is only Bond's adversary by circumstance? Rather than hating each other from the outset, Bond and the villain are forced into combat with one another, when normally they'd be very friendly to one another. I'm not talking about someone like Alec Trevalyan, who was Bond's best friend until he turned, but rather someone with whom Bond has a mutual respect, and would probably be good friends with them if circumstances were different.
Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:30 AM
Bond 23 ends with 007 caught by Quantum.
Bond 24 begins with a brainwashed Bond attempting to kill M. But recovers and finds No.1 of Quantum. Final in the "Garden of Death".
New Zealand will be great for the Garden. 10 years past from LOTR so its safer
Edited by Agent J.Bond, 07 December 2008 - 05:31 AM.
Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:36 AM
Bond 23 ends with 007 caught by Quantum.
Bond 24 begins with a brainwashed Bond attempting to kill M. But recovers and finds No.1 of Quantum. Final in the "Garden of Death".
New Zealand will be great for the Garden. 10 years past from LOTR so its safer
I like your ending idea for Bond 23, would certainly take an audience by surprise. Also, the brainwashed part for Bond 24, I think it would work perfectly for Craig.
Posted 07 December 2008 - 05:54 AM
Bond 23 ends with 007 caught by Quantum.
Bond 24 begins with a brainwashed Bond attempting to kill M. But recovers and finds No.1 of Quantum. Final in the "Garden of Death".
New Zealand will be great for the Garden. 10 years past from LOTR so its safer
I like your ending idea for Bond 23, would certainly take an audience by surprise. Also, the brainwashed part for Bond 24, I think it would work perfectly for Craig.
I like these ideas a lot, although I think that they would be best if they were pushed back another film (with Bond being caught by Quantum at the end of Bond 24). I think that, for the Garden of Death to be used during Craig's tenure, they would have to find a way for Craig's Bond to once again become haunted by losing Vesper, or at least find a way to bring that relationship back to the forefront of the films in order to give that particular setting and storyline the weight and emotion that it would need. Or Bond could fall in love again and have the woman once again taken away from him by Quantum (this time by the leader of the organization).
Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:10 AM
Bond 23 ends with 007 caught by Quantum.
Bond 24 begins with a brainwashed Bond attempting to kill M. But recovers and finds No.1 of Quantum. Final in the "Garden of Death".
New Zealand will be great for the Garden. 10 years past from LOTR so its safer
I like your ending idea for Bond 23, would certainly take an audience by surprise. Also, the brainwashed part for Bond 24, I think it would work perfectly for Craig.
I like these ideas a lot, although I think that they would be best if they were pushed back another film (with Bond being caught by Quantum at the end of Bond 24). I think that, for the Garden of Death to be used during Craig's tenure, they would have to find a way for Craig's Bond to once again become haunted by losing Vesper, or at least find a way to bring that relationship back to the forefront of the films in order to give that particular setting and storyline the weight and emotion that it would need. Or Bond could fall in love again and have the woman once again taken away from him by Quantum (this time by the leader of the organization).
That's a good idea too, I wish they could make Bond 23 similar to OHMSS (not a re-make) more like the Vesper storyline and no marriage. And then I'd like to see them do faithful adaptations of YOLT and TMWTGG, of course under different titles, i.e. 'Property Of A Lady' 'Risico', 'The Hildebrand Rarity'.
Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:19 AM
Bond 23 ends with 007 caught by Quantum.
Bond 24 begins with a brainwashed Bond attempting to kill M. But recovers and finds No.1 of Quantum. Final in the "Garden of Death".
New Zealand will be great for the Garden. 10 years past from LOTR so its safer
I like your ending idea for Bond 23, would certainly take an audience by surprise. Also, the brainwashed part for Bond 24, I think it would work perfectly for Craig.
I like these ideas a lot, although I think that they would be best if they were pushed back another film (with Bond being caught by Quantum at the end of Bond 24). I think that, for the Garden of Death to be used during Craig's tenure, they would have to find a way for Craig's Bond to once again become haunted by losing Vesper, or at least find a way to bring that relationship back to the forefront of the films in order to give that particular setting and storyline the weight and emotion that it would need. Or Bond could fall in love again and have the woman once again taken away from him by Quantum (this time by the leader of the organization).
That's a good idea too, I wish they could make Bond 23 similar to OHMSS (not a re-make) more like the Vesper storyline and no marriage. And then I'd like to see them do faithful adaptations of YOLT and TMWTGG, of course under different titles, i.e. 'Property Of A Lady' 'Risico', 'The Hildebrand Rarity'.
Agreed on wanting to see faithful adaptations of YOLT and TMWTGG. Both novels have some great unused elements that would work great in a film.
The way that I would go about doing this proposed storyline would be to have Bond fall in love again in Bond 24 (although with no marriage), and then have her meet her end at the hands of the leader (or one of the leaders) of Quantum at the end of Bond 24. Bond 25 would then be titled "Shatterhand, and be an adaptation of YOLT, with Bond missing at the end of the film. Bond 26 would be an adaptation of certain elements of TMWTGG.
Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:28 AM
You can bet they aren't.I hope EON is reading this
Posted 07 December 2008 - 06:34 AM
You can bet they aren't.I hope EON is reading this
Posted 07 December 2008 - 07:40 AM
It's for the better: if EON degenrate into fan-service, they'll never be able to make another original Bond film again - much less a good one - because they'll have to keep asking the fans what they want, and with everyone having his or her own opinion(s), it'd be a wonder if they could ever make a coherent film.Alas, you're right.
Posted 07 December 2008 - 08:25 AM
It's for the better: if EON degenrate into fan-service, they'll never be able to make another original Bond film again - much less a good one - because they'll have to keep asking the fans what they want, and with everyone having his or her own opinion(s), it'd be a wonder if they could ever make a coherent film.Alas, you're right.
Posted 07 December 2008 - 01:29 PM
Posted 08 December 2008 - 10:12 AM
Something that came to my mind a few days ago, is the thought of Bond persuing a villain on a busy motorway. After he realises the villain is too far away, he climbs out of the roof of the DBS, and uses the other traffic as stepping stones.
I know this could be either really really good or really really bad. I think, if done right it would be brilliant. Cars breaking, Bond flying onto oncoming traffic, nearly going under the wheels of trucks and busses, and holding on for dear life.
Posted 15 December 2008 - 07:36 AM
Posted 15 December 2008 - 08:17 AM