

Posted 24 March 2009 - 08:42 PM
Posted 24 March 2009 - 09:15 PM
Posted 24 March 2009 - 09:35 PM
For that matter, why did Bond even bother saving Camille? He crashed into Medrano's boat, in order to save this girl (that he's NEVER even met before). Yet, at the end of the boat chase, Bond just hands Camille to that guy and never looks back...Wow. Talk about insensitive...How could Bond crash his boat into Medrano's without getting extreme whiplash?
Bah.
How the hell did Bond manage to flip a bloody boat over?
Bah.
How the hell did Camille not have a bloodclot or massive internal bleeding when she got knocked out by an oncoming boat?
Bah.
Posted 25 March 2009 - 03:20 AM
Posted 26 March 2009 - 04:10 AM
Posted 26 March 2009 - 04:02 PM
Bah!
![]()
For that matter, why did Bond even bother saving Camille? He crashed into Medrano's boat, in order to save this girl (that he's NEVER even met before). Yet, at the end of the boat chase, Bond just hands Camille to that guy and never looks back...Wow. Talk about insensitive...How could Bond crash his boat into Medrano's without getting extreme whiplash?
Bah.
How the hell did Bond manage to flip a bloody boat over?
Bah.
How the hell did Camille not have a bloodclot or massive internal bleeding when she got knocked out by an oncoming boat?
Bah.![]()
Posted 26 March 2009 - 04:10 PM
True, but I think Bond is pretty good at reading body language, and he could see that what was going on between Camille and Greene on the dock wasn't a pleasant exchange. I would think that Bond is trained to spot subtle things about a person being taken captive, like the grabbing of Camille's arm, her facial expression which indicates that this is not a choice, etc.
For that matter, why did Bond even bother saving Camille? He crashed into Medrano's boat, in order to save this girl (that he's NEVER even met before). Yet, at the end of the boat chase, Bond just hands Camille to that guy and never looks back...Wow. Talk about insensitive...
I haven't a clue really. I pressumed it was.... erm... Oh, er.. hang on. I actually don't have any idea why the hell he did that. Was it not because he just felt that he should save her? Because she was obviously in danger? If that is the case, then it was poorly executed, considering the whole Camille is kidnapped thing was played out so casually, that an onlooker, especially at where Bond was stationed, would merely think that a woman was getting on a boat. She didn't scream, she didn't struggle, anything.
Edited by byline, 26 March 2009 - 04:12 PM.
Posted 26 March 2009 - 04:12 PM
Posted 26 March 2009 - 04:18 PM
There's also another point to consider: After Bond got in the car with Camille, then opened the briefcase, it became clear that someone wanted her dead. I suspect that, between what he was seeing on the dock and what he'd learned in the car, Bond knew that Camille was in danger. Since Camille was obviously a connection between Slate and whoever wanted Slate to kill her, Bond surmised that it must be Greene, and that Greene was handing her over to an unhappy end. Bond felt compelled to save her before further pursuing Greene to figure out what he was up to.I can see what you're saying, but It would be VERY difficult to spot someone's facial expression that far away.
But yes, I think we've found our answer.
Posted 26 March 2009 - 10:45 PM
How could Bond crash his boat into Medrano's without getting extreme whiplash?
Bah.
How the hell did Bond manage to flip a bloody boat over?
Bah.
How the hell did Camille not have a bloodclot or massive internal bleeding when she got knocked out by an oncoming boat?
Bah.
Posted 26 March 2009 - 10:48 PM
3. We don't actually see her face close enough after she is knocked out to tell if she is bleeding (which means one can't tell if she did or not).
BAH!
Posted 26 March 2009 - 11:57 PM
Posted 27 March 2009 - 11:55 AM
Posted 27 March 2009 - 08:19 PM
I have this translation from Babel Fish translation: Guard of stars.BTW, does anyone know what the translation of writing on the side of Bond' boat in QoS? Thanks!
Posted 27 March 2009 - 08:44 PM
Bah!
![]()
You know you're not doing yourself any favours. You're just making yourself look more stupid.
Posted 27 March 2009 - 09:37 PM
How could Bond crash his boat into Medrano's without getting extreme whiplash?
Bah.
How the hell did Bond manage to flip a bloody boat over?
Bah.
How the hell did Camille not have a bloodclot or massive internal bleeding when she got knocked out by an oncoming boat?
Bah.
2. Bond managed to flip the boat because he punctured it with a pretty large hook.
Posted 27 March 2009 - 09:45 PM
Bah!
![]()
You know you're not doing yourself any favours. You're just making yourself look more stupid.
I just had my best month ever in the markets and I don't care what anyone thinks about me on these forums.
Edited by MrKidd, 27 March 2009 - 09:45 PM.
Posted 28 March 2009 - 12:36 AM
The grappling hook's the anchor from Bond's boat. Bond pulls the rope, the hook goes in, and the dinghy goes 'pop'Yes but that hook had to be tied to something, this is the question
2. Bond managed to flip the boat because he punctured it with a pretty large hook.
Posted 28 March 2009 - 12:51 AM
Posted 28 March 2009 - 01:16 AM
OK, an explanation I can't recall having seen before that actually makes sense.Oxygen under pressure inside the rib get's released, which causes the boat to flip backwards through the air. End of that discussion!
Posted 28 March 2009 - 04:34 AM
It never goes over Bond's boat. It goes up and behind.OK, an explanation I can't recall having seen before that actually makes sense.Oxygen under pressure inside the rib get's released, which causes the boat to flip backwards through the air. End of that discussion!
But . . . if the boat is riding on the back of Bond's boat, how does it manage to move ahead of Bond's boat, then sail back over Bond's head?
Posted 28 March 2009 - 11:51 AM
Posted 28 March 2009 - 06:33 PM
Aaaahhhhhh . . . OK, I'll have to give it another look. Nine viewings in the theatre and another couple already on DVD, and I'd swear the boat goes sailing over Bond's head. But maybe it's because I think Bond makes a bit of a ducking motion as the boat flies up, so I'd assumed he was ducking from it going over his head.It never goes over Bond's boat. It goes up and behind.OK, an explanation I can't recall having seen before that actually makes sense.Oxygen under pressure inside the rib get's released, which causes the boat to flip backwards through the air. End of that discussion!
But . . . if the boat is riding on the back of Bond's boat, how does it manage to move ahead of Bond's boat, then sail back over Bond's head?
Posted 28 March 2009 - 08:00 PM
Posted 28 March 2009 - 09:44 PM
I know; I already said that. My comment has nothing to do with where the inflatable boat is when it first rides up on the back of Bond's boat. It's after that, when the hook lands in the rubber inflatable boat and then the rope goes taut, it has always looked to me like the inflatable went sailing from in front of Bond to behind him. That's the part I didn't understand.Boat land on back Bond's boat. Its not hard to see this
Posted 29 March 2009 - 09:24 AM
I know; I already said that. My comment has nothing to do with where the inflatable boat is when it first rides up on the back of Bond's boat. It's after that, when the hook lands in the rubber inflatable boat and then the rope goes taut, it has always looked to me like the inflatable went sailing from in front of Bond to behind him. That's the part I didn't understand.Boat land on back Bond's boat. Its not hard to see this
Edited by Colonel Moon, 29 March 2009 - 09:25 AM.
Posted 29 March 2009 - 01:18 PM
Posted 29 March 2009 - 10:40 PM
I have this translation from Babel Fish translation: Guard of stars.BTW, does anyone know what the translation of writing on the side of Bond' boat in QoS? Thanks!
Posted 29 March 2009 - 11:08 PM
Posted 30 March 2009 - 01:05 AM