Gun Barrel Design?
#1
Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:28 AM
I know the gun barrel comes at the end but the real question is: Is the gun barrel the same design as in Casino Royale or does it look more like the traditional one?
#2
Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:30 AM
#3
Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:33 AM
I think he means the actual, physical gun barrel.Traditional, white dots and all.
And no, I'm pretty sure it's not one with twenty-eight riflings again.
#4
Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:43 AM
Does the physical design look more like the Brosnan era design?
#5
Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:46 AM
Apparently (from a discussion at the MI6 forums), it closely resembles this mock-up featuring the gunbarrel from the AWTD music video (which was also designed by MK12). But apparently in the real thing it's a little less "white" towards the center, so the circle of white Bond stands in is more clearly defined from the rest of the gunbarrel.I know the gun barrel comes at the end but the real question is: Is the gun barrel the same design as in Casino Royale or does it look more like the traditional one?
Quantum of Solace Gunbarrel Mock-Up
So it's more tradition than the one in CASINO ROYALE, but it's still not exactly like the Binder/Kleinman designs. Something new.
#6
Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:50 AM
What's the context of the gun barrel? How goes it happen? Who's pointing the gun?
#7
Posted 04 November 2008 - 12:55 AM
Well, the final scene rolls. Bond and M chat... Bond walks away, dropping the Algerian loveknot in the snow. We FADE OUT, and then the gunbarrel dots run across the screen and it kicks off as you'd expect it to (though apparently Craig's walk is really aggressive, as if he's walking in to take the shot from the first minute he appears). The blood then drips on screen, and the gunbarrel circle slowly gets smaller and smaller until it becomes the O in QUANTUM OF SOLACE during the end credits title card.What's the context of the gun barrel? How goes it happen? Who's pointing the gun?
So no context within the story, and no-one really pointing a gun. Just a visual design that closes out the film and segues into the end credits.
#8
Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:02 AM
BTW- as soon as the GB finishes, the words QUANTUM OF SOLACE appear next to the GB, which is just lame beyond belief.
The CGI blood is just an animated, 2D pale shape that goes over the top. There's no reflection or shading to the blood ala CR.
Edited by tim partridge, 04 November 2008 - 01:04 AM.
#9
Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:53 AM
That's not too bad. Actually, I like it quite a bit. The whiteness in the centre is definitely something new. I'm sure the blood would contrast well with it. I'm looking forward to seeing this a lot.
#10
Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:21 PM
We FADE OUT, and then the gunbarrel dots run across the screen and it kicks off as you'd expect it to (though apparently Craig's walk is really aggressive
I'd call it 'grumpy' or 'sullen'! It's quite funny
The blood then drips on screen, and the gunbarrel circle slowly gets smaller and smaller until it becomes the O in QUANTUM OF SOLACE during the end credits title card.
And then, I think, I'm pretty sure Craig becomes the first Bond to walk out, stage left. Pretty sure I remember that, anyway.
It is quite big on screen- his walk doesn't take long. Arnold's music is a bit too shrill.
#11
Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:39 PM
This gunbarrel gets more experimental all the time. I for one think it is bold and quite brilliant.
#12
Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:42 PM
#13
Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:49 PM
#14
Posted 04 November 2008 - 01:57 PM
#15
Posted 04 November 2008 - 02:08 PM
I'm seeing it again in about an hour, I'll make sure to look out for it
#16
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:11 PM
#17
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:13 PM
I've seen it 3 times now and I've never noticed him walking off screen
I'm seeing it again in about an hour, I'll make sure to look out for it
Well, bear in mind that I might be wrong
#18
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:14 PM
The gunbarrel has NO LEAVES- it's literally just a white dot-
Actually does have the spiral grooves. It's not even close to being 'just a white dot'.
which just makes it look awkward, and it's HUUUUGE. It's not a dot within the centre of the frame with black surrounding it, but is nearly as high as the actual frame, with a little black width on either side.
Not accurate either. You may need to check the projection settings at your local cinema...
BTW- as soon as the GB finishes, the words QUANTUM OF SOLACE appear next to the GB, which is just lame beyond belief.
It doesn't appear next to it, the gunbarrel's centre becomes the Q in the movie's title.
Are you sure you saw the movie?!
#19
Posted 04 November 2008 - 03:58 PM
The gunbarrel has NO LEAVES- it's literally just a white dot-
Actually does have the spiral grooves. It's not even close to being 'just a white dot'.which just makes it look awkward, and it's HUUUUGE. It's not a dot within the centre of the frame with black surrounding it, but is nearly as high as the actual frame, with a little black width on either side.
Not accurate either. You may need to check the projection settings at your local cinema...BTW- as soon as the GB finishes, the words QUANTUM OF SOLACE appear next to the GB, which is just lame beyond belief.
It doesn't appear next to it, the gunbarrel's centre becomes the Q in the movie's title.
Are you sure you saw the movie?!
Apologies but I really do not recall the spiral grooves, but I am not doubting you either. They definitely weren't anywhere near as pronounced as the CG gunbarrel from the Brosnan era or CR. Seemed very very black, and I am pretty sure that the white dot Bond walks in IS enormous, at least compared to any version of it seen before. However, I am going totally off memory here, and it all happened very quickly.
I will stand by my Chav comment though- watch those shoulders ROLL!! Maybe they got the work experience boy to direct it. The choreography is so off. The smaller circle from the earlier films allowed Bond the leg room required to strut comfortably. Here he's having to compensate by using his shoulders. Licence to Kill? More like an ASBO.
#20
Posted 04 November 2008 - 04:08 PM
#21
Posted 04 November 2008 - 04:14 PM
The gunbarrel has NO LEAVES- it's literally just a white dot-
Actually does have the spiral grooves. It's not even close to being 'just a white dot'.which just makes it look awkward, and it's HUUUUGE. It's not a dot within the centre of the frame with black surrounding it, but is nearly as high as the actual frame, with a little black width on either side.
Not accurate either. You may need to check the projection settings at your local cinema...BTW- as soon as the GB finishes, the words QUANTUM OF SOLACE appear next to the GB, which is just lame beyond belief.
It doesn't appear next to it, the gunbarrel's centre becomes the Q in the movie's title.
Are you sure you saw the movie?!
Apologies but I really do not recall the spiral grooves, but I am not doubting you either. They definitely weren't anywhere near as pronounced as the CG gunbarrel from the Brosnan era or CR. Seemed very very black, and I am pretty sure that the white dot Bond walks in IS enormous, at least compared to any version of it seen before. However, I am going totally off memory here, and it all happened very quickly.
I will stand by my Chav comment though- watch those shoulders ROLL!! Maybe they got the work experience boy to direct it. The choreography is so off. The smaller circle from the earlier films allowed Bond the leg room required to strut comfortably. Here he's having to compensate by using his shoulders. Licence to Kill? More like an ASBO.
Exaggerating just a tad, aren't we...?
#22
Posted 04 November 2008 - 04:38 PM
Don't exaggerate Partridge, there was no such Chav shoulder roll. Though i have to admit Craig basically sprinted on to the set before firing the shot.
Yep Criag walks fast, but I really liked it because it was with so much purpose and seemed less stagey than a slower walk.
His turn and fire is great IMO. Again, strong and powerful.
As for the GB; it is NOT a great big white dot filling the screen as someone here claims. I've seen the film twice and the GB is well within the 2.35 wide screen widescreen ratio.
#23
Posted 04 November 2008 - 04:51 PM
Don't exaggerate Partridge, there was no such Chav shoulder roll. Though i have to admit Craig basically sprinted on to the set before firing the shot.
Yep Criag walks fast, but I really liked it because it was with so much purpose and seemed less stagey than a slower walk.
His turn and fire is great IMO. Again, strong and powerful.
As for the GB; it is NOT a great big white dot filling the screen as someone here claims. I've seen the film twice and the GB is well within the 2.35 wide screen widescreen ratio.
Very true Col. Sun, it is NOT a huge white dot, its normal size. And no CGI bullet like in DAD lol, that pissed me right off.
#24
Posted 04 November 2008 - 04:52 PM
Anyway, judge for yourselves- it's online:
http://uk.youtube.co...feature=related
#25
Posted 04 November 2008 - 04:56 PM
I never said the dot goes beyond the 2.35:1 frame. It did seem much much bigger than any previous GB dot from a Bond movie.
Anyway, judge for yourselves- it's online:
http://uk.youtube.co...feature=related
U trying to be witty?
#26
Posted 04 November 2008 - 04:58 PM
I never said the dot goes beyond the 2.35:1 frame. It did seem much much bigger than any previous GB dot from a Bond movie.
Anyway, judge for yourselves- it's online:
http://uk.youtube.co...feature=related
Not really necessary partridge, we all know what a chav looks like.
#27
Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:09 PM
#28
Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:16 PM
Although I wasn't expecting the GB, its very similar to the one used in the coke add zero zero 7. The music sounded similar to the roger moore TMWTGG. Also I think the actual gunbarrel had a tint of blue (similar to the on in AWTD). DC walks very fast in it, its a very short gunbarrel like in the early Connery films.
I've only seen the film once, but thats what I remember.
#29
Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:19 PM
DC walks very fast in it, its a very short gunbarrel like in the early Connery films.
Yep. The pose reminded me to the Connery/Bob Simmons one. BTW, did someone noticed that he isn't wearing the tux?
#30
Posted 04 November 2008 - 06:22 PM