Matthew Vaughn as Director
#31
Posted 12 June 2009 - 07:58 PM
#32
Posted 12 June 2009 - 10:09 PM
Scratch the action and Forster's done that. And really, QoS being a lot of action isn't entirely Forster's fault. Last time I checked the man didn't pen the film.
Oh I agree....it wasn't completely Forsters fault, it was mainly the writers and producers, but still would you want Forster back....or would you rather have a shot at upgrading?
The Bond franchise needs a director to match or be better than Martin Campbell was.
#33
Posted 12 June 2009 - 10:13 PM
#34
Posted 12 June 2009 - 10:24 PM
Scratch the action and Forster's done that. And really, QoS being a lot of action isn't entirely Forster's fault. Last time I checked the man didn't pen the film.
Oh I agree....it wasn't completely Forsters fault, it was mainly the writers and producers, but still would you want Forster back....or would you rather have a shot at upgrading?
The Bond franchise needs a director to match or be better than Martin Campbell was.
I wouldn't mind if Forster came back. I would prefer some new blood, simply to see what someone as can bring to the table, but Forster is nowhere near the bottom of my list. And, imo, it's a bit harsh to judge by Campbell. The man's a tough act to follow.
#35
Posted 12 June 2009 - 10:45 PM
Scratch the action and Forster's done that. And really, QoS being a lot of action isn't entirely Forster's fault. Last time I checked the man didn't pen the film.
Oh I agree....it wasn't completely Forsters fault, it was mainly the writers and producers, but still would you want Forster back....or would you rather have a shot at upgrading?
The Bond franchise needs a director to match or be better than Martin Campbell was.
That's not too hard, Campbell's a decent director, but he's not the be all end all when it comes to Bond directors. I felt Forster outdid Campbell in every category, but that's a moot point to you because I know you'll disagree with me anyways. Personally I'd love to have Tony Scott take a crack at a Bond film, and seeing as he was on the short list for Bond 22, I think there's a shot he might do it.
#36
Posted 12 June 2009 - 10:46 PM
Scratch the action and Forster's done that. And really, QoS being a lot of action isn't entirely Forster's fault. Last time I checked the man didn't pen the film.
Oh I agree....it wasn't completely Forsters fault, it was mainly the writers and producers, but still would you want Forster back....or would you rather have a shot at upgrading?
The Bond franchise needs a director to match or be better than Martin Campbell was.
That's not too hard, Campbell's a decent director, but he's not the be all end all when it comes to Bond directors. I felt Forster outdid Campbell in every category, but that's a moot point to you because I know you'll disagree with me anyways. Personally I'd love to have Tony Scott take a crack at a Bond film, and seeing as he was on the short list for Bond 22, I think there's a shot he might do it.
That'd be sweet, actually. I'd like to see his brother have a crack at it myself but he's a bit too big name now I think.
#37
Posted 12 June 2009 - 11:03 PM
Scratch the action and Forster's done that. And really, QoS being a lot of action isn't entirely Forster's fault. Last time I checked the man didn't pen the film.
Oh I agree....it wasn't completely Forsters fault, it was mainly the writers and producers, but still would you want Forster back....or would you rather have a shot at upgrading?
The Bond franchise needs a director to match or be better than Martin Campbell was.
That's not too hard, Campbell's a decent director, but he's not the be all end all when it comes to Bond directors. I felt Forster outdid Campbell in every category, but that's a moot point to you because I know you'll disagree with me anyways. Personally I'd love to have Tony Scott take a crack at a Bond film, and seeing as he was on the short list for Bond 22, I think there's a shot he might do it.
That'd be sweet, actually. I'd like to see his brother have a crack at it myself but he's a bit too big name now I think.
people complained about the editing of quantum of solace. i can only imagine the comments if tony scott was director and brought his current style to the film. i liked spy game a lot and still need to see crimson tide but i heard that was good.
#38
Posted 13 June 2009 - 01:01 AM
people complained about the editing of quantum of solace. i can only imagine the comments if tony scott was director and brought his current style to the film. i liked spy game a lot and still need to see crimson tide but i heard that was good.
That's why I want Scott, I enjoyed the direction QoS went in and would love to see something along the same lines. Maybe not edited as frenetically as Solace was, but I would love to see another decent paced Bond film that had style to boot.
#39
Posted 13 June 2009 - 03:25 AM
Vaughn's another favorite choice of mine. Layer Cake was so brutal and slick. The shooting and cinematography were a thing of beauty.
If I had it my way though I would hang on to Forster for a couple more films. I've had it with the huge shifts in style between the Bond films.
#40
Posted 13 June 2009 - 06:12 PM
I'd welcome a Bond film in the vein of Spy Game.
#41
Posted 13 June 2009 - 06:30 PM
Forster was an upgrade.
Maybe on paper but the end result imo is, that CR is a better made movie than QoS.
Scratch the action and Forster's done that. And really, QoS being a lot of action isn't entirely Forster's fault. Last time I checked the man didn't pen the film.
Oh I agree....it wasn't completely Forsters fault, it was mainly the writers and producers, but still would you want Forster back....or would you rather have a shot at upgrading?
The Bond franchise needs a director to match or be better than Martin Campbell was.
That's not too hard, Campbell's a decent director, but he's not the be all end all when it comes to Bond directors. I felt Forster outdid Campbell in every category, but that's a moot point to you because I know you'll disagree with me anyways. Personally I'd love to have Tony Scott take a crack at a Bond film, and seeing as he was on the short list for Bond 22, I think there's a shot he might do it.
That'd be sweet, actually. I'd like to see his brother have a crack at it myself but he's a bit too big name now I think.
people complained about the editing of quantum of solace. i can only imagine the comments if tony scott was director and brought his current style to the film. i liked spy game a lot and still need to see crimson tide but i heard that was good.
Crimson Tide was amazing. Denzel and Hackman owned the screen, never letting up.
#42
Posted 13 June 2009 - 06:50 PM
I think at this point, now that Danny Boyle has said he won't be directing the next one, Matthew Vaughn would definitely be my first choice. I think he could bring a fun, slick, yet intelligent feel to the film and he could do some interesting things with the characters.
Edited by DKelly, 13 June 2009 - 10:35 PM.
#43
Posted 13 June 2009 - 08:00 PM
Get Kevin McDonald.
#44
Posted 17 June 2009 - 06:18 PM
Edited by DKnight007, 17 June 2009 - 06:20 PM.
#45
Posted 17 June 2009 - 06:38 PM
word is chris Nolan may be done with Batman and won' return to do the next film.
Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
http://www.moviehole...ng-for-batman-3
#46
Posted 17 June 2009 - 06:45 PM
On paper he was a bloody awful choice. But he gave Quantum of Solace a cinematic quality that had been missing from the Bond series for 29 years.Forster was an upgrade.
Maybe on paper but the end result imo is, that CR is a better made movie than QoS.
Shame about some of the editing, though.
#47
Posted 17 June 2009 - 07:17 PM
Well.....
word is chris Nolan may be done with Batman and won' return to do the next film.
Are you thinking what I'm thinking?
http://www.moviehole...ng-for-batman-3
Nolan would be a good choice for a Bond film and he has said in the past that a dream of his is to direct a Bond film.
However, this is early take it with a grain of salt chat, with Nolan not returning for the 3rd film. He doesn't have to top TDK in total gross revenue, he would just have to tell another great Batman story.
Jonah and Goyer are working on the 3rd treatment and Chris is working on a movie right now INCEPTION. Whether or not the Nolans and Goyer come up with a good script and story will depend on whether or not Chris Nolan directs the next film.
In another 6 months to a year we should know something more concrete.
Edited by DKnight007, 17 June 2009 - 10:21 PM.
#48
Posted 17 June 2009 - 09:27 PM
#49
Posted 17 June 2009 - 10:22 PM
Nolan will be back. There was the same hub bub going on after BB when he went and did The Prestige. He needs distance from capes and rubber to clear his head.
Exactly....he will be back...
#50
Posted 17 June 2009 - 11:13 PM
#51
Posted 18 June 2009 - 01:17 AM
#52
Posted 18 June 2009 - 04:49 AM
He needs distance from capes and rubber to clear his head.
Sounds like my first relationship.
#53
Posted 18 June 2009 - 06:16 PM
On that basis, I imagine Matthew Vaughn would have a great deal to offer the Bondiverse, but would he be able to stand up to Eon? It's saddening that a lot of great talents have done their worst work for Broccoli and Wilson.
#54
Posted 18 June 2009 - 06:17 PM
Like who?I've only seen L4yer Cake but I would say that was one of the more remarkable directorial debuts of recent years.
On that basis, I imagine Matthew Vaughn would have a great deal to offer the Bondiverse, but would he be able to stand up to Eon? It's saddening that a lot of great talents have done their worst work for Broccoli and Wilson.
#55
Posted 18 June 2009 - 06:24 PM
Like who?I've only seen L4yer Cake but I would say that was one of the more remarkable directorial debuts of recent years.
On that basis, I imagine Matthew Vaughn would have a great deal to offer the Bondiverse, but would he be able to stand up to Eon? It's saddening that a lot of great talents have done their worst work for Broccoli and Wilson.
In DAD alone I’d say Madonna, Michael Madsen, Judi Dench, Lee Tamahori, Rosamund Pike, and Toby Stephens.
But that’s another thread.
#56
Posted 19 June 2009 - 09:02 AM
No. Not another thread. Just another opinion.Like who?I've only seen L4yer Cake but I would say that was one of the more remarkable directorial debuts of recent years.
On that basis, I imagine Matthew Vaughn would have a great deal to offer the Bondiverse, but would he be able to stand up to Eon? It's saddening that a lot of great talents have done their worst work for Broccoli and Wilson.
In DAD alone I’d say Madonna, Michael Madsen, Judi Dench, Lee Tamahori, Rosamund Pike, and Toby Stephens.
But that’s another thread.
#57
Posted 19 June 2009 - 09:20 AM
As for Michael Madsen, I don't think it's worth even starting.
#58
Posted 19 June 2009 - 09:53 AM
Rosamund Pike's worst ever work was in DAD? Have you seen Doom
No, I've been spared that pleasure.
I did see her in Hitchcock Blonde. I found her talents most inspiring. Uplifting, one might say.
#59
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:12 PM
God, I saw DOOM recently. It is truly awful, awful human waste of the highest order.Rosamund Pike's worst ever work was in DAD? Have you seen Doom?
As for Michael Madsen, I don't think it's worth even starting.
#60
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:18 PM
God, I saw DOOM recently. It is truly awful, awful human waste of the highest order.Rosamund Pike's worst ever work was in DAD? Have you seen Doom?
As for Michael Madsen, I don't think it's worth even starting.
Video game films always are.