
Oooh I wonder if this video will end up on the official Bond site...its got the Quantum of Solace logo at the end just like all the other blogs..
Posted 09 October 2008 - 05:23 PM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 05:32 PM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 06:03 PM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 06:16 PM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 06:30 PM
Oh, that video has more footage. I actually really like the bit of score we hear there... It has a distinctly different sound than anything Arnold's done before for Bond.Here it is:
http://vids.myspace....nelID=119278319
Posted 09 October 2008 - 07:56 PM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 08:05 PM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 11:17 PM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 03:04 AM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 03:39 AM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 03:39 AM
Get your first listen of the score for the 22nd James Bond film
Posted 10 October 2008 - 03:48 AM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 03:51 AM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 03:55 AM
Actually Mister E, I think the score will add to the title song in a complimentary manner which to me at least after watching the short clip here, makes the title make a lot more sense..
Posted 10 October 2008 - 04:19 AM
Yes, I also think that this is a new recording, but I think that it's basically the same arrangement. And I'm entirely glad about it. I've always thought that the Bond theme sounds its best when played in its classic arrangement (size of orchestra notwithstanding). No improvement necessary.Doubt it, since the rest of the footage of Arnold composing is from his work for QUANTUM OF SOLACE. Furthermore, I believe the sound of the Bond theme is subtly different here than the one for CASINO ROYALE.It's entirely possible that that recording of the Bond theme comes from the CR sessions- I don't think we can really glean too much from this.
I've heard another poster (DNS?) suggest that the theme is be as bold as it is and as jarring as it is for a very deliberate purpose. It's as if to say, "Here's your hero's theme in all its glory. This is the awful cost he had to bear so that you could be satisfied that "James Bond will return".It's all inference. The cue the orchestra is playing entitled is "Bond theme," which leads me to believe that it's a concert rendition of the theme. It also sounds like a straight-up concert piece, as well. So that leads me to believe it's an end credits piece more than anything else. I have a hard time imagining a straight-up concert version of the Bond theme playing during a section of the film, but I will concede that it's possible.What part of that video gives you the impression that the bond theme only plays at the end of QOS?
Eh, I still don't think it works even if one makes that arrangement. To make a point like that, it would have needed to be a darker, more melancholy take on the theme. What we get is big, swinging 60s Bond, with a really jarring transition (if the transition had been less bold, I think it would have worked better).I guess the case could be made that it was making a statement about how Bond is destined to continue living the same loveless life as a blunt instrument of her majesty's secret service... but I still would have preferred a subtler rendition.
Now that's the highest praise I've heard yet.Quite Herrmannesque.
Posted 10 October 2008 - 04:27 AM
Eh. If you want to fanwank it that way, I guess you can. But I don't think OHMSS is a film of great integrity or depth, or at least not enough of one to merit such an interpretation.I've heard another poster (DNS?) suggest that the theme is be as bold as it is and as jarring as it is for a very deliberate purpose. It's as if to say, "Here's your hero's theme in all its glory. This is the awful cost he had to bear so that you could be satisfied that "James Bond will return".
Posted 10 October 2008 - 04:52 AM
Ah, but you never know how lofty the intentions were. This is John Barry, who was probably given the most free reign he'd yet received in the Bond series, and who definitely wouldn't be one to phone it in on a Bond story like this one. The more I think about it, the more I think there was definite method to his madness, and it wasn't just a case of "The Bond theme would sound rousing here."Eh. If you want to fanwank it that way, I guess you can. But I don't think OHMSS is a film of great integrity or depth, or at least not enough of one to merit such an interpretation.I've heard another poster (DNS?) suggest that the theme is be as bold as it is and as jarring as it is for a very deliberate purpose. It's as if to say, "Here's your hero's theme in all its glory. This is the awful cost he had to bear so that you could be satisfied that "James Bond will return".
Posted 10 October 2008 - 05:36 AM
I don't (though I suspect, looking at the track record with the 60s Bonds and the film itself, they weren't particularly lofty at all). But if they were that lofty, they were too lofty for the film. The film's very shallow indeed. To throw in a trick like that at the end is rather silly, especially since it's going to be lost on so much of the audience - nobody's thinking on that level, since the film doesn't ever ask them to engage on that level.Ah, but you never know how lofty the intentions were.
Speculation. It could just as easily been a Broccoli/Saltzman mandate more than anything else.This is John Barry, who was probably given the most free reign he'd yet received in the Bond series, and who definitely wouldn't be one to phone it in on a Bond story like this one.
Posted 10 October 2008 - 07:13 AM
But wouldn't the intention simply be to jar the audience? I'm not saying the audience was immediately intended to think "Oh, I should feel guilty for wanting more James Bond movies; now look what I did," but that they should be jolted back into the reality that "This is James Bond. And James Bond will return." Maybe I'm totally fanwanking (which would be nothing new), but I genuinely do feel regret about Bond's returning when the instrumental violently gives way to the brassy chorus of the Bond theme. Just me.I don't (though I suspect, looking at the track record with the 60s Bonds and the film itself, they weren't particularly lofty at all). But if they were that lofty, they were too lofty for the film. The film's very shallow indeed. To throw in a trick like that at the end is rather silly, especially since it's going to be lost on so much of the audience - nobody's thinking on that level, since the film doesn't ever ask them to engage on that level.Ah, but you never know how lofty the intentions were.
Oh, no doubt. I'm just looking at the so-called "dramatic" content versus that of the five preceding films (none of which have a bonafide love story, no matter how well/badly OHMSS handled its own), the advent of a new Bond, and the evolving ear of a talented composer. This track could easily have been a producer-driven decision, but don't discount that Barry could have had the idea. Obviously, it wouldn't be in the final cut unless it had been approved, but composers generally get to experiment with how they want to use the music to evoke the moment (which is then subject to the director). Between Barry and Hunt, it's certainly not out of the question.Speculation. It could just as easily been a Broccoli/Saltzman mandate more than anything else.This is John Barry, who was probably given the most free reign he'd yet received in the Bond series, and who definitely wouldn't be one to phone it in on a Bond story like this one.
Posted 10 October 2008 - 08:39 AM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 10:43 AM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 12:26 PM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 01:28 PM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 01:47 PM
Well, unless "Another Way To Die" will be on the End Credits, yes the musics not presented at all in the order of the movie.
xxx
Posted 10 October 2008 - 01:59 PM
Doubt it, since the rest of the footage of Arnold composing is from his work for QUANTUM OF SOLACE.It's entirely possible that that recording of the Bond theme comes from the CR sessions- I don't think we can really glean too much from this.
Posted 10 October 2008 - 02:00 PM
And then they cut back to the orchestra playing the piece Arnold played in the little room, scoring the Palio chase from QUANTUM OF SOLACE.But they don't match too well: some footage of a full orchestra and then cut to Arnold on his own in a little room. Doesn't exactly look like they shot the two on the same day.
Posted 10 October 2008 - 02:19 PM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 04:58 PM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 05:06 PM