Indeed. I hope they go with The Riddler, a new interpretation of my favorite Batman villain is welcomed.Fantastic to have some minor form of confirmation that things are indeed moving forward.

SPOILERS: The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
#361
Posted 27 January 2009 - 03:42 AM
#362
Posted 27 January 2009 - 03:44 AM
I wouldn't get your hopes up. As I said before, the last on-record comments we had from David Goyer and Jonathan Nolan indicated that they weren't going to go for one of Batman's main foes in BATMAN 3, and would actually try to go for more obscure figures.I hope they go with The Riddler, a new interpretation of my favorite Batman villain is welcomed.
Naturally nothing's in stone, but for that, and also because I think Nolan will want to pick villains that will be very distanced from the Joker to avoid comparison, I think that it's very unlikely that we'll be seeing the Riddler in BATMAN 3.
#363
Posted 27 January 2009 - 05:48 AM
I see.I wouldn't get your hopes up. As I said before, the last on-record comments we had from David Goyer and Jonathan Nolan indicated that they weren't going to go for one of Batman's main foes in BATMAN 3, and would actually try to go for more obscure figures.
I’d like a more simple plot for the next film compared to the likes of TDK. No little subplots like Mr. Reese or anything, just have a sole focus and play it right until the end. Keep the focus even more on Batman himself and his struggle.
I'm warming to the idea of Batman himself being the featured "villain” in Batman 3 whilst dealing with the rising freak element The Joker has inspired. With being on the run, dealing with Harvey Dent's "ghost" and trying to clear his name, Batman has his hands full.
#364
Posted 27 January 2009 - 07:52 PM
It would be a nice change of pace, for sure.I’d like a more simple plot for the next film compared to the likes of TDK.
Well, I more and more think the crux of BATMAN 3 should be "Batman versus the government."I'm warming to the idea of Batman himself being the featured "villain” in Batman 3 whilst dealing with the rising freak element The Joker has inspired.
Well, I imagine Batman's not going to be trying to clear his name. Quite the opposite, in fact.With being on the run, dealing with Harvey Dent's "ghost" and trying to clear his name, Batman has his hands full.
#365
Posted 27 January 2009 - 08:33 PM
Well, I imagine Batman's not going to be trying to clear his name. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Agreed. It wouldn't make much sense for him to be doing so since he was the one that deliberately put himself in the position of being on the run.
As for villains, I'm hoping that they do indeed go with one of the lesser known villains. If they do go with a more well-known villain, then the only one I'm really in favor of seeing would be Casey Affleck as the Riddler. Otherwise, I'd rather see a lesser-known villain like Black Mask.
#366
Posted 27 January 2009 - 10:19 PM
#367
Posted 28 January 2009 - 08:06 AM
#369
Posted 29 January 2009 - 08:38 AM
#370
Posted 29 January 2009 - 04:36 PM
Eh, I think THE CAPED CRUSADER is an awkward title. It is associated more with the lighter era of Batman comics, and would look pretty darn silly on a poster. People are going to see this flick regardless of what it's called, but THE CAPED CRUSADE is a far cry from the elegant drama of a title like THE DARK KNIGHT.Hunt the Dark Knight...interesting..I still like The Caped Crusader, especially since Wayne's Russian date uses the term.
Batman (briefly) retired the cowl in THE DARK KNIGHT. Doing the same in BATMAN 3 would be horribly redundant.But you can't really hunt Batman if he retires the cowl..
That's not exactly what I'm thinking. I don't think Gotham will become like a police state. The Joker's terrorist activities were pretty threatening, but he's behind bars. I'm not too keen on seeing the government portrayed negatively.I like the idea of Batman vs the Goverment, that is if the events of the joker terrorism lead to extreme police statism(something that mirrors america's post 9-11 Bush administration behavior).
I want to see the dynamic of Batman versus a mostly well-intentioned government. He is, after all, a vigilante. They even mentioned in THE DARK KNIGHT that he would one day have to deal with the law (and that was before he took the blame for Two-Face's murders). BATMAN 3 should be, in some sense, the reckoning.
I think, after THE DARK KNIGHT, BATMAN 3 has the non-geek audience in the bag. But yeah, I think Catwoman would be a smart choice for a supporting figure in the next flick - shame that Jonathan Nolan and David Goyer seem dead-set against using her.I think a Catwoman appearence is mandatory. This series desperately needs an injection of sex appeal and a good (post Ledger) reason to attract the non geek audience.
#371
Posted 01 February 2009 - 01:01 AM
As for villains, I think it will be interesting to see where they go with it. Perhaps the Riddler could be brought in and used in an interesting way, perhaps with the government hiring Edward Nygma as an investigator to try to track down Batman and bring him to justice. Over the course of the film, we could see Nygma become more and more obsessed with discovering who Batman is, and becoming so obsessed with that "riddle" that he goes insane and becomes the Riddler.
I also wouldn't mind seeing them bring the Bane character into this as well. Seeing as how this particular franchise of films doesn't seem as though it will reach a point where it can conclude with the Knightfall storyline, why not bring Bane in now as hired muscle to try to find the Batman.
#372
Posted 01 February 2009 - 03:11 AM
I think adding the word "for" loses everything that was interesting and catchy about HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT. The way it's phrased as a sort of command is precisely what makes it so interesting (kind of like some older titles, like DON'T LOOK NOW or TASTE THE BLOOD OF DRACULA or what have you).I like the idea of the HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT title, although I think that I would prefer it more if the title were: HUNT FOR THE DARK KNIGHT.
#373
Posted 01 February 2009 - 07:34 PM
DARK IS THE KNIGHT
Or
EVER DARKER GROWS THE NIGHT
Please send my check. I need the dough. I told Santa I'd take her to dinner and can't afford the plane fare.
#374
Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:27 PM
Eh, I think THE CAPED CRUSADER is an awkward title. It is associated more with the lighter era of Batman comics, and would look pretty darn silly on a poster. People are going to see this flick regardless of what it's called, but THE CAPED CRUSADE is a far cry from the elegant drama of a title like THE DARK KNIGHT.Hunt the Dark Knight...interesting..I still like The Caped Crusader, especially since Wayne's Russian date uses the term.
I guess THE CAPED CRUSADER ain't as elegant and sophisticated and sleekly mysterious a title as THE DARK KNIGHT, but it neither is it nearly as undignified as you're making out, and it is instantly iconic Batman.
Furthermore, a character in BATMAN BEGINS 3 could mokingly refer to our hero as "the caped crusader", as though he's some kind of pathetic clown with ideas above his station, just another pitiable shlub like those wannabes in the multistorey car park sequence near the start of THE DARK KNIGHT. Don't forget that Batman's name is now mud, so THE CAPED CRUSADER might tie into the film rather better than you think.
In any case, I still dislike HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT. I guess it's possible that the next film may be called simply BATMAN.
#375
Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:32 PM
GOTHAM
CHRONICLES
BATMAN
PUBLIC ENEMY
#376
Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:38 PM
#377
Posted 01 February 2009 - 09:58 PM
It may be "instantly iconic Batman," but it's not reminiscent of the kind of Batman Nolan's dealing with. It calls to mind the sillier Batman of years gone by, which is why it's ill-fit for this "gritty" adaptation.I guess THE CAPED CRUSADER ain't as elegant and sophisticated and sleekly mysterious a title as THE DARK KNIGHT, but it neither is it nearly as undignified as you're making out, and it is instantly iconic Batman.
I could see that, but I don't really like the title as a reference to an insult flung at Batman. Especially for the close to Nolan's Batman trilogy.Furthermore, a character in BATMAN BEGINS 3 could mokingly refer to our hero as "the caped crusader", as though he's some kind of pathetic clown with ideas above his station, just another pitiable shlub like those wannabes in the multistorey car park sequence near the start of THE DARK KNIGHT. Don't forget that Batman's name is now mud, so THE CAPED CRUSADER might tie into the film rather better than you think.
Fair enough. I still think it fits better than any other potential title. Sure, you could call it GOTHAM or something like that, but that's pretty generic. At least HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT is striking (admittedly in a pulpy sort of way) and would really capture the essence of the film (as far as I've been imagining the essence of the film, that is).In any case, I still dislike HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT.
People said the same thing about THE DARK KNIGHT. It's my guess that Nolan will go for something more distinctive than BATMAN, though. It would feel kind of lazy. Nolan's titles up until this point have tied into the essence of the film he's dealing with... BATMAN is so bland and generic it would fit practically any Batman story ever written.I guess it's possible that the next film may be called simply BATMAN.
#378
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:54 PM
#379
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:57 PM
I like it, but it's far too reminiscent of the Michael Mann film PUBLIC ENEMIES coming out this year (with Christian Bale, no less).I like Agent 76's suggestion of BATMAN: PUBLIC ENEMY. How's that for a title suitably drenched in film noir? OTOH, it does also remind one of the rap group.
#380
Posted 02 February 2009 - 09:14 AM
I think adding the word "for" loses everything that was interesting and catchy about HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT. The way it's phrased as a sort of command is precisely what makes it so interesting (kind of like some older titles, like DON'T LOOK NOW or TASTE THE BLOOD OF DRACULA or what have you).I like the idea of the HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT title, although I think that I would prefer it more if the title were: HUNT FOR THE DARK KNIGHT.
After thinking about it a bit, I do agree that HUNT FOR THE DARK KNIGHT might not be the right title. Another suggestion I would have, though, would be to take the name that people call Batman within The Dark Knight ("The Batman" instead of just "Batman" like in the first four movies) and build the title around that.
Perhaps this title: HUNT THE BATMAN
Edited by tdalton, 02 February 2009 - 09:30 AM.
#381
Posted 02 February 2009 - 12:09 PM
I think adding the word "for" loses everything that was interesting and catchy about HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT. The way it's phrased as a sort of command is precisely what makes it so interesting (kind of like some older titles, like DON'T LOOK NOW or TASTE THE BLOOD OF DRACULA or what have you).I like the idea of the HUNT THE DARK KNIGHT title, although I think that I would prefer it more if the title were: HUNT FOR THE DARK KNIGHT.
After thinking about it a bit, I do agree that HUNT FOR THE DARK KNIGHT might not be the right title. Another suggestion I would have, though, would be to take the name that people call Batman within The Dark Knight ("The Batman" instead of just "Batman" like in the first four movies) and build the title around that.
Perhaps this title: HUNT THE BATMAN
HTB, I fear, won't work. But to pacify Harms who prefers the baroque:
LONG DAY'S JOURNEY INTO KNIGHT?

#382
Posted 02 February 2009 - 12:47 PM
Brilliant, dodge, brilliant!LONG DAY'S JOURNEY INTO KNIGHT?


#383
Posted 03 February 2009 - 01:09 AM
LONG DAY'S JOURNEY INTO KNIGHT?

#384
Posted 10 February 2009 - 12:06 AM
#385
Posted 10 February 2009 - 12:30 AM
HUNTED KNIGHT
DARK KNIGHT
FUGITIVE
BATMAN
SHADOWS
#386
Posted 01 April 2009 - 08:04 AM
I was April Fooled, I won't bother posting the story now.
#387
Posted 01 April 2009 - 03:16 PM
#388
Posted 02 April 2009 - 04:30 AM
Two-Face was ruined too but he turned out great in The Dark Knight.If Bane wasn't RUINED in Batman & Robin, he might have done nicely too.
#389
Posted 02 April 2009 - 04:35 AM

#390
Posted 02 April 2009 - 11:24 AM
Brilliant, dodge, brilliant!LONG DAY'S JOURNEY INTO KNIGHT?
![]()
Thank you, ACE. Sorry for the delay in response, have been hyper-busy on new job.