Blofeld's Return?
#91
Posted 18 December 2007 - 05:59 AM
#92
Posted 18 December 2007 - 07:25 AM
#93
Posted 18 December 2007 - 10:15 AM
#94
Posted 18 December 2007 - 11:36 AM
#95
Posted 18 December 2007 - 03:39 PM
For arguements sake, let say Blofeld does return, do you think that the powers that be can make a updated version of the character and win us over as this new Bond has?
Absolutely yes.
#96
Posted 18 December 2007 - 10:44 PM
#97
Posted 19 December 2007 - 09:46 PM
For arguements sake, let say Blofeld does return, do you think that the powers that be can make a updated version of the character and win us over as this new Bond has?
I would hope that they can, enough of the sterotypical Bond Villian that the YOLT Blofeld has engraved in our minds. But then again, isn't there some sort of legal issue with Blofeld and SPECTRE? But then again, was that all thrown out the window once Kevin McClory died?
#98
Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:48 PM
HF
#99
Posted 22 December 2007 - 09:39 AM
#100
Posted 22 December 2007 - 09:49 AM
The only one I like it's in NSNA, with the skull and all of those things...
#101
Posted 27 December 2007 - 05:20 PM
#102
Posted 27 December 2007 - 10:07 PM
Given the news that Mathieu Amalric will be portraying a character named as "Maurice Green", it seems that Max von Sydow's comments were simply taken out of context. Probably for the best that there doesn't seem to be a resurrection of Blofeld in my opinion.
I'm so glad that, if the report that "Maurice Green" is Amalric's character, that Blofeld will not be returning in Bond 22. There is so much more interesting territory for the Bond films to cover rather than going back into the past and bringing back characters that don't need to be brought back to the franchise.
#103
Posted 27 December 2007 - 10:11 PM
Given the news that Mathieu Amalric will be portraying a character named as "Maurice Green", it seems that Max von Sydow's comments were simply taken out of context. Probably for the best that there doesn't seem to be a resurrection of Blofeld in my opinion.
I'm so glad that, if the report that "Maurice Green" is Amalric's character, that Blofeld will not be returning in Bond 22. There is so much more interesting territory for the Bond films to cover rather than going back into the past and bringing back characters that don't need to be brought back to the franchise.
tdalton, we may not agree on Casino Royale, but we do agree on this.
#104
Posted 27 December 2007 - 10:14 PM
#105
Posted 27 December 2007 - 11:33 PM
Googling around, I note that there's an American sprinter called Maurice Greene. Okay, the spelling's different, but, still.... Wouldn't having a villain with a famous namesake in real life be the sort of move that makers of a Hollywood blockbuster would tend to avoid?
#106
Posted 27 December 2007 - 11:47 PM
"The name Maurice Green, nor any other name in this film, is
meant to portray an actual person"
#107
Posted 28 December 2007 - 01:05 AM
#108
Posted 28 December 2007 - 01:19 AM
The only one I like it's in NSNA, with the skull and all of those things...
I believe the skull makes its return in the fanfilm Shamelady.
#109
Posted 28 December 2007 - 02:11 AM
Maurice Green? What an extraordinarily boring name for a Bond villain - if anything it sounds like a smokescreen-type thingy for Blofeld (not that I'm convinced that Blofeld is returning, but I wouldn't be opposed to it).
Googling around, I note that there's an American sprinter called Maurice Greene. Okay, the spelling's different, but, still.... Wouldn't having a villain with a famous namesake in real life be the sort of move that makers of a Hollywood blockbuster would tend to avoid?
Agreed. It could be a smokescreen for Amalric actually being Blofeld, but I really do hope that this doesn't turn out to be the case and the Maurice Green character is actually Maurice Green and not Blofeld or any other former Bond villain returning to make an appearance in the new franchise.
#110
Posted 28 December 2007 - 02:20 AM
I really hope Blofeld is in Bond 22.
I hope for the complete opposite. I've never really liked Blofeld in the films.
#111
Posted 28 December 2007 - 02:31 AM
#112
Posted 29 December 2007 - 12:10 AM
Harry
#113
Posted 29 December 2007 - 12:37 AM
#114
Posted 29 December 2007 - 01:03 AM
That's just it: I'm hoping for a Blofeld we've never seen, but one that does the character Fleming wrote justice. In Craig's Bond arc, it would be cool to see an updated Blofeld ala Craig's updated Bond IMO.
How about a Blofeld who dresses up like his dead mother and stabs women to death with a kitchen knife whenever he has a lustful thought?
Hey, it's a Blofeld we've never seen before.
What...? Why are you looking at me like that?
#115
Posted 29 December 2007 - 01:17 AM
#116
Posted 29 December 2007 - 01:19 AM
I'm all for it. As long as it's a different take on the character. Make him more sinister, deadly and elusive.
McClory is gone, time to give Blofeld back to Fleming's estate and EON productions. Where he belongs.
#117
Posted 29 December 2007 - 01:39 AM
McClory is gone, time to give Blofeld back to Fleming's estate and EON productions. Where he belongs.
I heartily agree with you, sir.
#118
Posted 02 January 2008 - 08:00 PM
That's just it: I'm hoping for a Blofeld we've never seen, but one that does the character Fleming wrote justice. In Craig's Bond arc, it would be cool to see an updated Blofeld ala Craig's updated Bond IMO.
What do we need a new Blofeld for? With CASINO ROYALE, EON Productions has restarted the series with something new - a Bond movie that does not require a Moneypenny or Q. So, what do we need Blofeld - new or old - for? Why go back to the past? Why not go forward? Is the future that frightening for Bond fans that they have to cling to characters from the past?
#119
Posted 02 January 2008 - 10:10 PM
Bond's future frightening? Au contraire.That's just it: I'm hoping for a Blofeld we've never seen, but one that does the character Fleming wrote justice. In Craig's Bond arc, it would be cool to see an updated Blofeld ala Craig's updated Bond IMO.
What do we need a new Blofeld for? With CASINO ROYALE, EON Productions has restarted the series with something new - a Bond movie that does not require a Moneypenny or Q. So, what do we need Blofeld - new or old - for? Why go back to the past? Why not go forward? Is the future that frightening for Bond fans that they have to cling to characters from the past?
IMHO, bringing back Blofeld now, after the events of CR (Bond in love, then the death of his lover due to dastardly designs) allows EON the opportunity to right a great wrong: EON totally screwed up the original Bond/Blofeld story arc, Fleming's OMHSS/YOLT novels represent some of the best writing he ever did in many ways, but particularly with the character of Bond and his interactions with Blofeld/the whole revenge thing. That Fleming ended the series how he began it, with a woman defining Bond but not without consequences, is fortuitous as Craig's Bond can get the satisfaction Lazenby's Bond--and at least a few Bond fans--never did.
But if EON goes off on a completely different tangent, so be it. It's not about not doing something new. It's about unfinished business. I have no interest in seeing the Dr Evil version of Blofeld, but I would very much like to see Bond strangle Blofeld ala the end of YOLT, and for a uniquely similar (lol at those two words stuck together) reason: taking Bond's beloved from him. It would be a signature moment in the film series, just as it is in Fleming's novels IMO.
EON's Bond never got closure after Tracy died. How about doing something new in the film series, like getting some emotional closure for Bond? After the back-to-Fleming film version of CR, it would be a very Fleming thing to do next IMO. Agree it doesn't have to be Blofeld as the big baddie in Bond 22, but golly it sure seems like he fits, and what a fantastic opportunity for EON...almost like they planned it (woudn't surprise me if they did...). For me, I think any new storyline that lets Bond have a bit of revenge for Vesper's death that doesn't involve Blofeld will feel a bit...odd. I mean if it's anything like CR I'm sure I'll like it, but there'll be that little part of me thinking, dudes, you could've done that with Blofeld...BLOFELD!!!
IMO, Blofeld in Bond 22 would indeed be new, very much so. Won't look like we expect (if it's Amalric as rumored), and likely won't be/act/end up anything like we expect (ala Craig's Bond in CR). Bring on the new! Anyway, 2 or 3 cents about "new = frightening."
#120
Posted 02 January 2008 - 11:54 PM
Bringing back Blofeld now, after the events of CR (Bond in love, then the death of his lover due to dastardly designs) allows EON the opportunity to right a great wrong: EON totally screwed up the original Bond/Blofeld story arc, Fleming's OMHSS/YOLT novels represent some of the best writing he ever did in many ways, but particularly with the character of Bond and his interactions with Blofeld/the whole revenge thing. That Fleming ended the series how he began it, with a woman defining Bond but not without consequences, is fortuitous as Craig's Bond can get the satisfaction Lazenby's Bond--and at least a few Bond fans--never did.
But if EON goes off on a completely different tangent, so be it. It's not about not doing something new. It's about unfinished business. I have no interest in seeing the Dr Evil version of Blofeld, but I would very much like to see Bond strangle Blofeld ala the end of YOLT, and for a uniquely similar (lol at those two words stuck together) reason: taking Bond's beloved from him. It would be a signature moment in the film series, just as it is in Fleming's novels IMO.
EON's Bond never got closure after Tracy died. How about doing something new in the film series, like getting some emotional closure for Bond? After the back-to-Fleming film version of CR, it would be a very Fleming thing to do next IMO. Agree it doesn't have to be Blofeld as the big baddie in Bond 22, but golly it sure seems like he fits, and what a fantastic opportunity for EON...almost like they planned it (woudn't surprise me if they did...). For me, I think any new storyline that lets Bond have a bit of revenge for Vesper's death that doesn't involve Blofeld will feel a bit...odd. I mean if it's anything like CR I'm sure I'll like it, but there'll be that little part of me thinking, dudes, you could've done that with Blofeld...BLOFELD!!!
Amen, brother; a Blofeld by any other name wouldn't make revenge as sweet.