Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Fans review the Casino Royale script!(Some Spoilers)


83 replies to this topic

#31 deth

deth

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2651 posts
  • Location:Berlin, Germany

Posted 05 May 2006 - 04:25 PM

man...... GS sounded really jaded and biased there..... yikes. I wonder what he thinks of the Bond books....

#32 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:39 AM

Having read the script a bunch more times and really mulled it over, these are the things I would change to make it a perfect shooting script (spoilermarked just because they may or may not big spoilers that people may wish not to know):

Spoiler


Otherwise, I'd leave everything else intact.

#33 Blofeld's Cat

Blofeld's Cat

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Location:A secret hollowed out volcano in Sydney (33.79294 South, 150.93805 East)

Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:50 AM

Damn, I wish I could get my hands on this script!

#34 Tajike

Tajike

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 22 posts
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:53 AM

Having read the script a bunch more times and really mulled it over, these are the things I would change to make it a perfect shooting script (spoilermarked just because they may or may not big spoilers that people may wish not to know):

Spoiler


Otherwise, I'd leave everything else intact.


Which brings me to the following question: Is there any chance there WILL HAVE BEEN changes made to the script since December and/or while shooting the film?

#35 Blofeld's Cat

Blofeld's Cat

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Location:A secret hollowed out volcano in Sydney (33.79294 South, 150.93805 East)

Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:55 AM

Always bound to happen during filming or in the editing stage of any production, Tejike.

#36 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:58 AM

Which brings me to the following question: Is there any chance there WILL HAVE BEEN changes made to the script since December and/or while shooting the film?

We know there have been some made, and yes, Haggis was rewriting through February, I believe, so changes have occurred. To what extent, I'm unsure.

-We know Felix Leiter has been added in, presumably replacing a CIA agent already in the script.

-We know the finale has been dressed up with a boat chase that isn't in the script.

-Other possible changes include a restructuring of the last section of the film to close with the the famous "The bitch is dead now" line, if Martin Campbell's comment in March that it does in fact end the film is to be believed.

Dialogue has likely been modified in various places and possibly some scenes lost and added. It would be entirely typical. We honestly don't know.

#37 _Ozu_

_Ozu_

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 226 posts
  • Location:Spain

Posted 07 May 2006 - 02:06 AM

Moonraker's boat chase in Venice up to 21th Century withouth the wine's guy and the duff, and including Daniel Craig...I'm loving it :tup:

I really really want to get the script :D

Tell us where to get it :D

#38 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 07 May 2006 - 02:09 AM

This little quote from Gravity's Silhouette pretty much shows why he dissagrees with me on this script and DC.

"Purvis and Wade have not been perfect, but I have enjoyed 90% of their contributions to the series. Their work on The World is Not Enough was excellent, and I thought most of Die Another Day was excellent as well (the mishandled cgi sequences notwithstanding)"

Excellent...hmmm the word I'd choose to describe TWINE...four letters, beginning with an SH and ending with an IT, with it's nonsense of a plot and bad dialogue, tacked on action scenes, made for computer game feel and bad performances.

I thought most of DAD was utterly awful and didn't feel like a Bond film at all to me.

An "excellent" Bond film to me is Dr No, FRWL, Goldfinger, Thunderball, TLD, LTK

A "good" Bond film to me is along the lines of OHMSS, YOLT, LALD, Goldeneye

The Dec '05 script draft wasn't perfect, but it was, as it stands, reading better than most Bond films to date and with a little tweaking of the end chunk, the torture scene and the odd little bits and bobs it could be incredible.

Just a clarification for anyone curious about my difference to GS in that review. Now you see HOW we differ and why. One of us likes crazy "fun" popcorn flick silly Bond films (ie, bad films) and the other prefers good films which are well made with coherent plots (I stress plot) and characters...as opposed to comic cardboard cutouts with less depth than you'll find in the character sin your Daily Dilbert. Yet still with the classic Bond elements, but preferably with a slightly harder edge.

#39 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:49 AM

Harmsway:

Spoiler


#40 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 02:28 PM

Harmsway:

Spoiler

Here's my response:

Spoiler


#41 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 02:41 PM

-We know the finale has been dressed up with a boat chase that isn't in the script.


News to me. A boat chase, eh? Hmmm.... :tup:

By the day, CR is sounding less "a gritty return to Fleming by way of Eon's FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE" (I'm not actually quoting anyone here, but it's the impression given by a lot of past talk about the film), and more like a blend of GOLDENEYE and TWINE, albeit with added risky elements like Craig (I'm very pleased he's Bond, but I doubt he'll be universally loved, to put it mildly) and, apparently, a very long section featuring nothing but card playing.

BTW, was that the boat chase glimpsed in the teaser?

#42 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 07 May 2006 - 03:28 PM


-We know the finale has been dressed up with a boat chase that isn't in the script.


News to me. A boat chase, eh? Hmmm.... :tup:

By the day, CR is sounding less "a gritty return to Fleming by way of Eon's FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE" (I'm not actually quoting anyone here, but it's the impression given by a lot of past talk about the film), and more like a blend of GOLDENEYE and TWINE, albeit with added risky elements like Craig (I'm very pleased he's Bond, but I doubt he'll be universally loved, to put it mildly) and, apparently, a very long section featuring nothing but card playing.

BTW, was that the boat chase glimpsed in the teaser?



FRWL was very faithful to the novel, yet had a boat chase added as well as a helicopter fight with numerous machine guns and explosions for good measure...the addition of SPECTRE as the main villainous org. and then a completely different ending.

Edited by Leon, 07 May 2006 - 03:29 PM.


#43 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:11 PM


-We know the finale has been dressed up with a boat chase that isn't in the script.

News to me. A boat chase, eh? Hmmm.... :D

Actually, the boat chase is a good thing. If you read the script, you'll see the finale needed a bit more oompf, and that should provide it.

By the day, CR is sounding less "a gritty return to Fleming by way of Eon's FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE" (I'm not actually quoting anyone here, but it's the impression given by a lot of past talk about the film), and more like a blend of GOLDENEYE and TWINE, albeit with added risky elements like Craig (I'm very pleased he's Bond, but I doubt he'll be universally loved, to put it mildly) and, apparently, a very long section featuring nothing but card playing.

For what it's worth, it's still a much "smaller" film than GOLDENEYE and TWINE, even with its three set pieces (two in the first third and one in the last 20 minutes). It's the smallest film EON has had since LICENCE TO KILL.

The long section of card playing is also broken up with different interludes. "Nothing but card playing" is very misleading. It's a lot more fragmented than that and it works. It's very faithful to the book, but just dressed up more to make it work as a movie. That whole section gets a giant :tup: from me.

BTW, was that the boat chase glimpsed in the teaser?

That was Bond's arrival in Nassau. The boat chase in Venice hasn't been filmed yet.

#44 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:15 PM

That was Bond's arrival in Nassau.


So the Bahamas will also be the Bahamas, as well as standing in for other places?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that means that CR will take place in the following countries:

Bahamas
Italy
Madagascar
Montenegro
Pakistan
United Kingdom
United States

Any I'm missing out, or have got wrong?

#45 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:18 PM


That was Bond's arrival in Nassau.

So the Bahamas will also be the Bahamas, as well as standing in for other places?

Yup, in a wonderful Nassau sequence that's quite reminiscent of the better bits of THUNDERBALL.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that means that CR will take place in the following countries:

Bahamas
Italy
Madagascar
Montenegro
Pakistan
United Kingdom
United States

Any I'm missing out, or have got wrong?

Prague. That's the only one you're missing out on.

#46 Simon Beavis

Simon Beavis

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 143 posts
  • Location:Little Rock, Arkansas

Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:27 PM

though certain theories are unlikely due to the surprising finale of Casino Royale


And what theories are those?

#47 Agent Spriggan Ominae

Agent Spriggan Ominae

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1068 posts
  • Location:Aiea,Hawaii

Posted 07 May 2006 - 07:38 PM

though certain theories are unlikely due to the surprising finale of Casino Royale


And what theories are those?


I would possibly say the theories about furture villains. Here's a theory I have about possible changes to the script. Now...

Spoiler


#48 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:16 PM

I would possibly say the theories about furture villains. Here's a theory I have about possible changes to the script. Now...

Spoiler

Spoiler


#49 Simon Beavis

Simon Beavis

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 143 posts
  • Location:Little Rock, Arkansas

Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:20 PM


though certain theories are unlikely due to the surprising finale of Casino Royale


And what theories are those?


I would possibly say the theories about furture villains. Here's a theory I have about possible changes to the script. Now...

Spoiler


Spoiler


#50 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:21 PM

Spoiler

Spoiler


#51 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:27 PM

Spoiler


#52 Agent Spriggan Ominae

Agent Spriggan Ominae

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1068 posts
  • Location:Aiea,Hawaii

Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:36 PM


Spoiler

Spoiler


Spoiler


#53 JCRendle

JCRendle

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3639 posts
  • Location:Her Majesty's England

Posted 07 May 2006 - 09:06 PM

Spoiler


#54 Agent Spriggan Ominae

Agent Spriggan Ominae

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1068 posts
  • Location:Aiea,Hawaii

Posted 07 May 2006 - 09:09 PM

Spoiler



Ah yes! Perhaps....

Spoiler

Edited by Agent Spriggan Ominae, 07 May 2006 - 09:12 PM.


#55 Simon Beavis

Simon Beavis

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 143 posts
  • Location:Little Rock, Arkansas

Posted 07 May 2006 - 09:35 PM

And here I was hoping for a clear sequel setup/multi-film story arc, with a CSM/Darth Sidious type figure briging the two together.

Looks like that's not going to happen unless someone does some rewriting.

Edited by Simon Beavis, 07 May 2006 - 09:39 PM.


#56 JCRendle

JCRendle

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3639 posts
  • Location:Her Majesty's England

Posted 07 May 2006 - 10:56 PM

Have any films been a direct sequel apart from FRWL?

#57 Simon Beavis

Simon Beavis

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 143 posts
  • Location:Little Rock, Arkansas

Posted 07 May 2006 - 11:36 PM

Have any films been a direct sequel apart from FRWL?


Technially no, unless you count TSWLM or MR, but then again Jaws is the only thing holding the two together), but on the webpage didn't one of guys say "some things will spill over in to the next film" or something along those lines?

#58 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 08 May 2006 - 03:33 AM

Spoiler


I actually had a thought about that:

Spoiler


#59 Simon Beavis

Simon Beavis

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 143 posts
  • Location:Little Rock, Arkansas

Posted 08 May 2006 - 06:16 PM


Spoiler


I actually had a thought about that:

Spoiler



I like that idea, they could also do a setup similar to how 24 brought back Nina Myers in season 2 (because of her connection to a terrorist plot set in motion, they had to release her from prison to get her assistance).

But, unless they change the finale, I have a feeling White might end up "in the diplomatic bag".

Edited by Simon Beavis, 08 May 2006 - 06:17 PM.


#60 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 15 May 2006 - 04:03 PM

i must say that M does quite alot of swearing in the script and for some reason felix is not mentioned in the draft

Edited by mharkin, 15 May 2006 - 05:07 PM.