Fans review the Casino Royale script!(Some Spoilers)
#31
Posted 05 May 2006 - 04:25 PM
#32
Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:39 AM
Otherwise, I'd leave everything else intact.
#33
Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:50 AM
#34
Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:53 AM
Having read the script a bunch more times and really mulled it over, these are the things I would change to make it a perfect shooting script (spoilermarked just because they may or may not big spoilers that people may wish not to know):
Spoiler
Otherwise, I'd leave everything else intact.
Which brings me to the following question: Is there any chance there WILL HAVE BEEN changes made to the script since December and/or while shooting the film?
#35
Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:55 AM
#36
Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:58 AM
We know there have been some made, and yes, Haggis was rewriting through February, I believe, so changes have occurred. To what extent, I'm unsure.Which brings me to the following question: Is there any chance there WILL HAVE BEEN changes made to the script since December and/or while shooting the film?
-We know Felix Leiter has been added in, presumably replacing a CIA agent already in the script.
-We know the finale has been dressed up with a boat chase that isn't in the script.
-Other possible changes include a restructuring of the last section of the film to close with the the famous "The bitch is dead now" line, if Martin Campbell's comment in March that it does in fact end the film is to be believed.
Dialogue has likely been modified in various places and possibly some scenes lost and added. It would be entirely typical. We honestly don't know.
#37
Posted 07 May 2006 - 02:06 AM
I really really want to get the script
Tell us where to get it
#38
Posted 07 May 2006 - 02:09 AM
"Purvis and Wade have not been perfect, but I have enjoyed 90% of their contributions to the series. Their work on The World is Not Enough was excellent, and I thought most of Die Another Day was excellent as well (the mishandled cgi sequences notwithstanding)"
Excellent...hmmm the word I'd choose to describe TWINE...four letters, beginning with an SH and ending with an IT, with it's nonsense of a plot and bad dialogue, tacked on action scenes, made for computer game feel and bad performances.
I thought most of DAD was utterly awful and didn't feel like a Bond film at all to me.
An "excellent" Bond film to me is Dr No, FRWL, Goldfinger, Thunderball, TLD, LTK
A "good" Bond film to me is along the lines of OHMSS, YOLT, LALD, Goldeneye
The Dec '05 script draft wasn't perfect, but it was, as it stands, reading better than most Bond films to date and with a little tweaking of the end chunk, the torture scene and the odd little bits and bobs it could be incredible.
Just a clarification for anyone curious about my difference to GS in that review. Now you see HOW we differ and why. One of us likes crazy "fun" popcorn flick silly Bond films (ie, bad films) and the other prefers good films which are well made with coherent plots (I stress plot) and characters...as opposed to comic cardboard cutouts with less depth than you'll find in the character sin your Daily Dilbert. Yet still with the classic Bond elements, but preferably with a slightly harder edge.
#39
Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:49 AM
#40
Posted 07 May 2006 - 02:28 PM
Here's my response:Harmsway:
Spoiler
#41
Posted 07 May 2006 - 02:41 PM
-We know the finale has been dressed up with a boat chase that isn't in the script.
News to me. A boat chase, eh? Hmmm....
By the day, CR is sounding less "a gritty return to Fleming by way of Eon's FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE" (I'm not actually quoting anyone here, but it's the impression given by a lot of past talk about the film), and more like a blend of GOLDENEYE and TWINE, albeit with added risky elements like Craig (I'm very pleased he's Bond, but I doubt he'll be universally loved, to put it mildly) and, apparently, a very long section featuring nothing but card playing.
BTW, was that the boat chase glimpsed in the teaser?
#42
Posted 07 May 2006 - 03:28 PM
-We know the finale has been dressed up with a boat chase that isn't in the script.
News to me. A boat chase, eh? Hmmm....
By the day, CR is sounding less "a gritty return to Fleming by way of Eon's FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE" (I'm not actually quoting anyone here, but it's the impression given by a lot of past talk about the film), and more like a blend of GOLDENEYE and TWINE, albeit with added risky elements like Craig (I'm very pleased he's Bond, but I doubt he'll be universally loved, to put it mildly) and, apparently, a very long section featuring nothing but card playing.
BTW, was that the boat chase glimpsed in the teaser?
FRWL was very faithful to the novel, yet had a boat chase added as well as a helicopter fight with numerous machine guns and explosions for good measure...the addition of SPECTRE as the main villainous org. and then a completely different ending.
Edited by Leon, 07 May 2006 - 03:29 PM.
#43
Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:11 PM
Actually, the boat chase is a good thing. If you read the script, you'll see the finale needed a bit more oompf, and that should provide it.News to me. A boat chase, eh? Hmmm....
-We know the finale has been dressed up with a boat chase that isn't in the script.
For what it's worth, it's still a much "smaller" film than GOLDENEYE and TWINE, even with its three set pieces (two in the first third and one in the last 20 minutes). It's the smallest film EON has had since LICENCE TO KILL.By the day, CR is sounding less "a gritty return to Fleming by way of Eon's FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE" (I'm not actually quoting anyone here, but it's the impression given by a lot of past talk about the film), and more like a blend of GOLDENEYE and TWINE, albeit with added risky elements like Craig (I'm very pleased he's Bond, but I doubt he'll be universally loved, to put it mildly) and, apparently, a very long section featuring nothing but card playing.
The long section of card playing is also broken up with different interludes. "Nothing but card playing" is very misleading. It's a lot more fragmented than that and it works. It's very faithful to the book, but just dressed up more to make it work as a movie. That whole section gets a giant from me.
That was Bond's arrival in Nassau. The boat chase in Venice hasn't been filmed yet.BTW, was that the boat chase glimpsed in the teaser?
#44
Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:15 PM
That was Bond's arrival in Nassau.
So the Bahamas will also be the Bahamas, as well as standing in for other places?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that means that CR will take place in the following countries:
Bahamas
Italy
Madagascar
Montenegro
Pakistan
United Kingdom
United States
Any I'm missing out, or have got wrong?
#45
Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:18 PM
Yup, in a wonderful Nassau sequence that's quite reminiscent of the better bits of THUNDERBALL.So the Bahamas will also be the Bahamas, as well as standing in for other places?
That was Bond's arrival in Nassau.
Prague. That's the only one you're missing out on.Correct me if I'm wrong, but that means that CR will take place in the following countries:
Bahamas
Italy
Madagascar
Montenegro
Pakistan
United Kingdom
United States
Any I'm missing out, or have got wrong?
#46
Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:27 PM
though certain theories are unlikely due to the surprising finale of Casino Royale
And what theories are those?
#47
Posted 07 May 2006 - 07:38 PM
though certain theories are unlikely due to the surprising finale of Casino Royale
And what theories are those?
I would possibly say the theories about furture villains. Here's a theory I have about possible changes to the script. Now...
#48
Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:16 PM
I would possibly say the theories about furture villains. Here's a theory I have about possible changes to the script. Now...
Spoiler
#49
Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:20 PM
though certain theories are unlikely due to the surprising finale of Casino Royale
And what theories are those?
I would possibly say the theories about furture villains. Here's a theory I have about possible changes to the script. Now...Spoiler
#50
Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:21 PM
Spoiler
#51
Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:27 PM
#52
Posted 07 May 2006 - 08:36 PM
SpoilerSpoiler
#53
Posted 07 May 2006 - 09:06 PM
#54
Posted 07 May 2006 - 09:09 PM
Spoiler
Ah yes! Perhaps....
Edited by Agent Spriggan Ominae, 07 May 2006 - 09:12 PM.
#55
Posted 07 May 2006 - 09:35 PM
Looks like that's not going to happen unless someone does some rewriting.
Edited by Simon Beavis, 07 May 2006 - 09:39 PM.
#56
Posted 07 May 2006 - 10:56 PM
#57
Posted 07 May 2006 - 11:36 PM
Have any films been a direct sequel apart from FRWL?
Technially no, unless you count TSWLM or MR, but then again Jaws is the only thing holding the two together), but on the webpage didn't one of guys say "some things will spill over in to the next film" or something along those lines?
#58
Posted 08 May 2006 - 03:33 AM
Spoiler
I actually had a thought about that:
#59
Posted 08 May 2006 - 06:16 PM
Spoiler
I actually had a thought about that:Spoiler
I like that idea, they could also do a setup similar to how 24 brought back Nina Myers in season 2 (because of her connection to a terrorist plot set in motion, they had to release her from prison to get her assistance).
But, unless they change the finale, I have a feeling White might end up "in the diplomatic bag".
Edited by Simon Beavis, 08 May 2006 - 06:17 PM.
#60
Posted 15 May 2006 - 04:03 PM
Edited by mharkin, 15 May 2006 - 05:07 PM.