Posted 19 February 2006 - 07:43 PM
Boy, and I thought American pop pseudo-journalism was bad.
Obviously, the Mirror just has an axe to grind, and didn't have a good front-page story for today, so decided to kill two birds with one stone. Even if what they're saying is 100% true, I still don't see how it matters, given that it clearly hasn't impacted Craig for the worse, judging by his pictures from the press conference (some have even argued he looked better and more Bondian than ever!), and the damage was relatively easy to repair. Hell, by their own admission it seems he only chipped two front teeth. And he took it like a champ at that. Not exactly a big deal. Almost a rite of initiation even.
Besides, we've had Bond actors sport wigs, use chest-augmenting ice-packs, undergo facelifts, shoot out kidney stones, scar their pretty-boy lips, and damage their knees, not to mention utilize stunt doubles with regularity, all this despite the mythic nature of the action hero each of them portrayed, so I just don't see where this invincible-Bond-actor theory comes from. These people are human, and the only thing that's really important is that they become Bond on the big screen. What they do in their personal lives, and even what happens while filming, doesn't matter to me. Cinema is an art of welcome deception, after all. So the Mirror can shove it, because I'm still looking forward to immersing myself in a world I know to be fantasy, and a highly enjoyable one at that.