Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

CBn forum is devoted to harpooning [Daniel Craig]?


69 replies to this topic

#61 Monsieur B

Monsieur B

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 532 posts
  • Location:C'wood, ON, Canada

Posted 20 October 2005 - 07:12 PM

"What are you blaming Daniel Craig for today?" - a good joke definitely taken in the wrong context. Out of all of the things that those news sites should've picked up from this site and they choose that. Did they even read the content inside the thread to realise that it was merely a joke, as mentioned before, a satirical jab at all of the anti-Craig buzz that has been flying around ever since his inauguration as Bond last weekend. 'Tis truly a sad day... :)

But to be honest, the decision on Craig has made the forums a little disgruntled and I say that it is only a phase. It's customary after a new Bond has been selected, the idea of Craig as Bond simply has to grow on all the anti-Craig people. Eventually, those of you will learn to move on and accept Craig but until you do, we are all going to have to tread lightly. CommanderBond.net IS the best Bond site out there, now let's try and keep it that way.

Edited by Monsieur B, 20 October 2005 - 07:14 PM.


#62 Jeff007

Jeff007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2076 posts
  • Location:Afghanistan

Posted 20 October 2005 - 08:20 PM

I've been reading the CBN forum's for few years now. I've been away with my work a lot so, I don't have as many posts as other people have. What I've noticed in the past few years, is how much these forums have turned into a Bash all thing Bond, and then, have the true fans have to defend the statements. When I was in High School, if I mentioned anything James Bond, I had to do most of my defending there. You wouldn't think that when you come to your community of 007 fans that you would have to do the same. Sure there are weaker 007 films, however there are good things in them that some fans immediately don't take into consideration. Are you a 007 fan, or just a fan of a few of the movies? Now, we have Daniel Craig step into the role. Wham! He gets smashed. So, not only is the press not backing him, yet his loyal 007 fans are not even on his side. I'm not saying he's going to be the next Connery, but let's face it.... he's here and he IS James Bond. Athena is right and now CBN is in the media for the wrong reasons. Keep the harsh bashing to those nights when your drinking with your buddies. Were are not Star Wars, Star Trek ect Fans. We are 007 fans and we hold ourselves in high regard. Nobody does it better, and we don't need any Oddjob's in the forum throwing there hat as they please. So, keep it professional and keep it to constructive criticism. Good Luck, Daniel. I'm backing you.

#63 Moore Not Less

Moore Not Less

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1030 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 20 October 2005 - 08:45 PM

I'm not particularly all hunky dorry over Craig as the new Bond. But all this "Craig is the worst Bond" crap is ridiculous. How can he be the worst Bond when he's not even had the opportunity to be James Bond on screen. No one here as seen him as 007 yet. So those who are not being Craig judgmental and being a supporter aren't necessarily saying, "Whatever Eon wants, we are drones." No... they're saying Ok thank gawd they finally chose a 007, I may or may not be happy about it but yay a new movie is actually happening... we'll see how Craig performs. It's called being reasonable, respectful while voicing an opinion. Perhaps you should try it sometime. :)

View Post



I am far from hunky dorry about Daniel Craig, but I very much believe in the benefit of the doubt, innocent until proven guilty and all that. I find it very hard to understand and accept those who say that they will refuse to see Casino Royale because Craig is 007. Are they really Bond fans? Give the man a chance.

While I have noted the negativity towards Craig, it's been refreshing to note that he does have a lot of supporters here at CBn. When I looked at the poll last night Craig had an approx 60% approval rating from those members that had voted.

#64 1q2w3e4r

1q2w3e4r

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1336 posts

Posted 20 October 2005 - 10:44 PM

EON have been doing it for 40+ years. They haven't gotten too much wrong. We could at least wait until snippets are recieved from "sources" once CR rolls film to hang the guy in the roll.

#65 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 21 October 2005 - 03:25 AM

The only thing that I don't understand about the criticism of Daniel Craig is how some of it can be made without having seen him in action as Bond. But, of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion of whether or not the man is good looking enough or whether or not he is a good enough actor to play the part. The only thing that I think people should do is give him a chance. I gave Pierce Brosnan a chance (and really wanted him to succeed, by the way) as Bond, but eventually got to the point where I was underwhelmed by his performances as Bond.

#66 Bon-san

Bon-san

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4124 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 21 October 2005 - 05:31 PM

The only thing that I don't understand about the criticism of Daniel Craig is how some of it can be made without having seen him in action as Bond. 

View Post


I understand your POV, but to be fair, one must often render critical evaluation in advance of seeing something in action. I was critical of Bob Dole's candidacy for the US Presidency, and I'd never seen him in action as The President.

#67 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 21 October 2005 - 06:11 PM

[quote name='Bon-san' date='21 October 2005 - 13:31'][quote name='tdalton' date='20 October 2005 - 22:25']The only thing that I don't understand about the criticism of Daniel Craig is how some of it can be made without having seen him in action as Bond.

#68 J.B.

J.B.

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 297 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 21 October 2005 - 06:51 PM

Okay. This may have already been said here but I didnt see it so I wanted to say this about the article that is talking bad of CBn.

First, the article was trying to find justification for it's own negative writing on Craig. So, they pull in the top website CBn into the article and and use parts of it to make their point. They did this without balanced reporting on CBn. WRONG MOVE.

Dont you thing that someone on the CBn board needs to write a letter to MSNBC or the Contra Costa Times and state that we dont appreciate the misrepresentation and point out that we have both sides represented? I know it wouldnt do any good however, it would make a statement to them that we are aware of what is happening in the world outside CBn and would appreciate fair reporting on what is taking place on the website.

Second, I am thankful to be apart of a site that has both sides represented in any topic that is explored, not just Craig's hiring. That is what makes this website so much fun. People are free to vent, get excited, talk about the past and the future, and do so cleanly (most of the time) and honestly.

It is no different than when a past Bond film is revisited and torn apart for its weaknesses and strengths. When I watch that film again after the critique, I see it differently, even if I didnt agree with the critic.

Granted, things are a bit crazy right now in this change. But, the change was sort of unexpected in the end and was set up as a firing rather than a friendly parting so things will be crazy for awhile. Then they will back down again and we will all sit down and watch CR. But, get ready, because then the craziness will occur all over again with people talking about everything: actors, writing, place in history, etc.. :) :)

Edited by J.B., 21 October 2005 - 06:53 PM.


#69 Bon-san

Bon-san

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4124 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 21 October 2005 - 11:27 PM

[quote name='tdalton' date='21 October 2005 - 13:11'][quote name='Bon-san' date='21 October 2005 - 13:31'][quote name='tdalton' date='20 October 2005 - 22:25']The only thing that I don't understand about the criticism of Daniel Craig is how some of it can be made without having seen him in action as Bond.

#70 Gabe Vieira

Gabe Vieira

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3873 posts
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa, USA

Posted 22 October 2005 - 03:28 AM

I've really been trying to avoid this situation, but it has gotten to me. This is just absurd. To everybody who is complaining about Daniel Craig being cast as James Bond: just get over it already. Your complaining is in no way helping anybody, and it will sure as Hell not not get Daniel Craig un-cast from the part. If you want to boycott Casino Royale or do anything else, then go right ahead but we no not need a new thread every half-hour about the subject.

Now, news sources are claiming that we here at CommanderBond.Net have a thread devoted to bashing Daniel Craig. I bet that makes Dave really happy. Sure other James Bond sites might actaully have Craig bashing threads, but CommanderBond.Net is the largest James Bond fansite on the Internet, and this makes us look bad. I know that not everybody thinks about that before they post.

But please, once again to Craig-haters, I beg of you: Try to keep as much as possible to yourself. And what you do post, try to make sure that it is nothing that shows your stupidity on the issue, like simply saying that Craig sucks and give no appearent reason, for your sake. Think of CBn.