Okay. This may have already been said here but I didnt see it so I wanted to say this about the article that is talking bad of CBn.
First, the article was trying to find justification for it's own negative writing on Craig. So, they pull in the top website CBn into the article and and use parts of it to make their point. They did this without balanced reporting on CBn. WRONG MOVE.
Dont you thing that someone on the CBn board needs to write a letter to MSNBC or the Contra Costa Times and state that we dont appreciate the misrepresentation and point out that we have both sides represented? I know it wouldnt do any good however, it would make a statement to them that we are aware of what is happening in the world outside CBn and would appreciate fair reporting on what is taking place on the website.
Second, I am thankful to be apart of a site that has both sides represented in any topic that is explored, not just Craig's hiring. That is what makes this website so much fun. People are free to vent, get excited, talk about the past and the future, and do so cleanly (most of the time) and honestly.
It is no different than when a past Bond film is revisited and torn apart for its weaknesses and strengths. When I watch that film again after the critique, I see it differently, even if I didnt agree with the critic.
Granted, things are a bit crazy right now in this change. But, the change was sort of unexpected in the end and was set up as a firing rather than a friendly parting so things will be crazy for awhile. Then they will back down again and we will all sit down and watch CR. But, get ready, because then the craziness will occur all over again with people talking about everything: actors, writing, place in history, etc..
Edited by J.B., 21 October 2005 - 06:53 PM.