Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Jurassic Park 4


96 replies to this topic

#31 [dark]

[dark]

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6239 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 26 August 2004 - 03:22 AM

Dark Horizons is reporting that Angel's David Boreanaz is up for the lead role in the film, presumably that of Nick Harris.

#32 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 26 August 2006 - 05:11 PM

Is anyone looking forward too seeing the fourth installment of Jurassic Park?

#33 Doubleshot

Doubleshot

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 988 posts
  • Location:Oklahoma

Posted 26 August 2006 - 05:17 PM

I grew up with Jurassic Park, and to some degree, The Lost World. I love them both as entertaining popcorn films with admirable attempts at popcorn plots, but Jurassic Park III did very little for me; and with what has been said about JP4 in recent years, it too seems like a monumental disaster.

#34 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 26 August 2006 - 08:38 PM

Making JURASSIC PARK IV is just beating a dead horse. Hollywood needs to know when they should leave franchises alone - whether Rambo, Rocky, Die Hard, or Indiana Jones.

#35 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 26 August 2006 - 08:53 PM

Hollywood needs to know when they should leave franchises alone - whether Rambo, Rocky, Die Hard, or Indiana Jones.


Definitely. Of those franchises you mention, only ROCKY BALBOA truly interests me. The others should be left alone, and this is coming from someone who was a big fan of all of them back in the day. I'm definitely not a sequel-hater, but sometimes enough is enough.

Mind you, it seems that, nowadays, all franchises have a "second life" thanks to this "reboot" boom. Time was when a flop sequel would close the lid on things. Not any more - just wait a few years and bring on the remake. The whole reboot thing is kind of like a pension scheme for franchises. :)

Is anyone looking forward too seeing the fourth installment of Jurassic Park?


No.

#36 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 26 August 2006 - 09:22 PM

I used to be, but it just seems like another sequel that keeps getting delayed over and over again...

#37 Blofeld's Cat

Blofeld's Cat

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Location:A secret hollowed out volcano in Sydney (33.79294 South, 150.93805 East)

Posted 26 August 2006 - 10:31 PM

Making JURASSIC PARK IV is just beating a dead horse.

Or dinosaur.

#38 The Richmond Spy

The Richmond Spy

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1586 posts
  • Location:Cincinnati, Ohio USA

Posted 26 August 2006 - 11:05 PM

I loved the JP films...especially 1 and 2...but 3 had one of the worst endings I've seen in my life. The raptors became weak and indecisive...and the Navy (or the Marines...can't remember) came and saved the day...not to mention the spinosaurus only kills people at the very beginning.

IMO they should make another film with dinosaurs along the same lines as JP...but just don't call it JP4...it kind of limits the creativity since they have their T-Rex and Raptor quota that must be met. Even though the raptors used to be the scariest dinos in the film...

#39 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 26 August 2006 - 11:38 PM

They should do the decent thing and just not bother. Although I'm sure that, as ever, greed will win the day.

#40 Johnboy007

Johnboy007

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6990 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 26 August 2006 - 11:41 PM

Liked the first two, the third sucked royally.

#41 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 27 August 2006 - 01:50 AM

Liked the first two, the third sucked royally.


I used to like the third one alot, but a recent viewing has made it sink quite a bit compared to the first two.

#42 Number 6

Number 6

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6555 posts
  • Location:Born & raised in N.Y.C., lives in Dallas

Posted 27 August 2006 - 04:15 AM

No. Just keep this franchise dead and buried.

#43 drmedula

drmedula

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 26 posts

Posted 27 August 2006 - 12:21 PM

Can't say I care too much one way or another about more JP films, but when I saw the KONG remake, I was struck by how, after a dozen years, they really haven't improved on the original JP's dinos (which were, contrary to popular belief, mostly done with "Live Action" effects)... so much for the alleged superiority of CGI...

#44 Scottlee

Scottlee

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2592 posts
  • Location:Leeds, England

Posted 27 August 2006 - 03:22 PM

Oh god, not another Jurassic Park film.

Only seen the first two, and hated them both.

#45 K1Bond007

K1Bond007

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4932 posts
  • Location:Illinois

Posted 27 August 2006 - 09:23 PM

I think they should let it go, but I believe there is room for a 4th with the right approach. Get a good director, have Michael Crichton write it, and it could be good. I don't know.

#46 Scottlee

Scottlee

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2592 posts
  • Location:Leeds, England

Posted 28 August 2006 - 07:39 PM

It's the kiddy feel I can't stand. Give me a violent and accurate portrayal of the world Crichton actually wrote about and you might get a decent film on your hands. I was only 13 when I saw the original Jurassic Park at the cinema and I went home feeling extremely let down given all the hype. Lots of CGI, no film.

#47 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 28 August 2006 - 07:51 PM

Lots of CGI, no film.



*Cough* Die another Day *Cough*

#48 Double-Oh-Zero

Double-Oh-Zero

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3167 posts
  • Location:Ottawa, Ontario (via Brantford)

Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:46 PM

Let it go. The first two were great, and the third could have been better if Mr. Spielberg and Mr. Crichton were attached.

What would be the excuse for going back this time? Can't they just nuke the sodding island?

#49 DaveBond21

DaveBond21

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 18026 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia (but from the UK)

Posted 29 August 2006 - 02:20 AM

Oh dear!!!

I once had the misfortune of watching one of them on a flight to Japan. I think it was number 3.

Maybe it was No.2??

It started with Jeff Goldblum saying "No, don't go to that island. It starts off OK but then there's running and screaming, then more running", and when I realised it was almost sending itself up, I thought, why are they even bothering??

Now there is news about a 4th one, LOL. I can't even watch the first one anymore, doesn't interest me.

#50 Skudor

Skudor

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9286 posts
  • Location:Buckinghamshire

Posted 29 August 2006 - 02:23 AM

They will needs something seriously new for this to work. It's an old and dried out concept.

#51 dunmall

dunmall

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 567 posts

Posted 29 August 2006 - 07:21 AM

They will needs something seriously new for this to work. It's an old and dried out concept.


Search Ain't It Cool News for a review they did of a JP 4 script supposedly written by the legendary John Sayles...I believe the ideas in that script fell within the realm of "seriously new" :)

#52 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 29 August 2006 - 11:12 AM

I believe the ideas in that script fell within the realm of "seriously new" :)


Yeah. Special forces dinosaurs toting machine guns, if I remember correctly (no, I'm not joking). It struck me as "seriously terrible". :P

#53 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 29 August 2006 - 04:52 PM

It's the kiddy feel I can't stand. Give me a violent and accurate portrayal of the world Crichton actually wrote about and you might get a decent film on your hands. I was only 13 when I saw the original Jurassic Park at the cinema and I went home feeling extremely let down given all the hype. Lots of CGI, no film.

That's true - Crichton's book felt more like ALIENS than it did the kiddie-fest that was Spielberg's version. I've always been disappointed in the movie versions for that reason. At this point, though, I think it's too late to do that.

#54 Skudor

Skudor

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9286 posts
  • Location:Buckinghamshire

Posted 29 August 2006 - 04:55 PM


I believe the ideas in that script fell within the realm of "seriously new" :P


Yeah. Special forces dinosaurs toting machine guns, if I remember correctly (no, I'm not joking). It struck me as "seriously terrible". :P


:)

Sounds like a fresh idea, at least. Still wouldn't watch it though.

#55 DaveBond21

DaveBond21

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 18026 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia (but from the UK)

Posted 30 August 2006 - 12:57 AM

Yes, sounds terrible.

I actually don't like sequels really. I liked Back to the Future 2, Indiana Jones & the Temple of Doom.


But although I enjoy the originals, I have no interest in any of the instalments that followed Alien, Friday 13th, The Omen, Halloween, Ghostbusters, Gremlins, Childs Play.

#56 Skudor

Skudor

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9286 posts
  • Location:Buckinghamshire

Posted 30 August 2006 - 01:00 AM

I guess you don't mind sequels to Bond films though? :)

#57 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 30 August 2006 - 01:04 AM

Special forces dinosaurs toting machine guns


:)

#58 DaveBond21

DaveBond21

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 18026 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia (but from the UK)

Posted 30 August 2006 - 01:12 AM

I guess you don't mind sequels to Bond films though?



No, I like them!!!! :)


I don't think we see them as sequels to each other? It is a franchise but there is little continuity between the movies.

#59 Johnboy007

Johnboy007

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6990 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 30 August 2006 - 01:23 AM

Yes, sounds terrible.

I actually don't like sequels really. I liked Back to the Future 2, Indiana Jones & the Temple of Doom.


But although I enjoy the originals, I have no interest in any of the instalments that followed Alien, Friday 13th, The Omen, Halloween, Ghostbusters, Gremlins, Childs Play.


I must admit I'm a huge huge fan of Aliens and I love Ghostbusters 2.

#60 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 30 August 2006 - 01:31 AM


But although I enjoy the originals, I have no interest in any of the instalments that followed Alien, Friday 13th, The Omen, Halloween, Ghostbusters, Gremlins, Childs Play.

I must admit I'm a huge huge fan of Aliens and I love Ghostbusters 2.

ALIENS is a terrific film.