CBn Mole II : Challenge Four
#181
Posted 19 March 2004 - 05:50 AM
But I don't condone torturing the team, that's The Mole's job.
#182
Posted 19 March 2004 - 05:55 AM
No.I have a suggestion
All you have to do is tell the team where and when you are going to post and you'll get your halo. For now you're with trs, but he is a winner, it's not such a bad place to be.
Edited by mattbowyer, 19 March 2004 - 05:56 AM.
#183
Posted 19 March 2004 - 05:59 AM
If all goes to plan i'll even rub their faces in it on day 5.
You're right about the winning bit, pity he won't win this mole.
Still i'm sure he can pull a good second place after me.
Whatever my prize, if any, victory is the cherry on top, and the game is the cake. The sweet sweet cake of competition.
#184
Posted 19 March 2004 - 05:59 AM
#185
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:02 AM
#186
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:09 AM
#187
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:13 AM
Any ETA on day 4?
#188
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:15 AM
Fair enough. I just wanted the team to know I cared.
Next day starts in 01:45
#189
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:16 AM
Ya, it's just too bad you'll be taking the "walk of shame"I'm sure i'll be waving ta ta to you soon enough
#190
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:21 AM
We should really try a Jeff Probst "snuffing".Ya, it's just too bad you'll be taking the "walk of shame"
#191
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:30 AM
You were in mole 1 weren't you Athena. Learn anything?
#192
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:35 AM
#193
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:39 AM
As for a pact, it's always cute to see to losers clinging on to each other
#194
Posted 19 March 2004 - 06:43 AM
#195
Posted 19 March 2004 - 12:00 PM
As the winner of Mole One, I demand respect. That is Mr. Slime to you, thank you very much.If That way I have something to aim for rather than a lowlife point wasting exemption like that slime trs
#196
Posted 19 March 2004 - 01:01 PM
Our pact is still in place--our pact was for teamwork--but when Matt throws an exemption your way. . . . .that's a whole other story. Athena, you just saw TCA, to paraphrase: you can trust our pact, as long as your interests don't run too contrary to my own.trs didn't have to talk, did he? Who is it who actually lost us the points? him or me? or both of us together? Remember round one? trs and I ?supposedly? made a ?pact?.
Besides, ever think that things worked out exactly how I wanted them too?
And for the other post, SE: Losers do not cling together, we band together to WIN. Or need I direct you to my avatar for a glimpse of what it is like to be a winner? ;
Edited by trs007, 19 March 2004 - 01:12 PM.
#197
Posted 19 March 2004 - 02:18 PM
Currently none has been made.
#198
Posted 19 March 2004 - 02:55 PM
Now that I certainly understand, Mr Sir... your honor... mighty SlimeOur pact is still in place--our pact was for teamwork--but when Matt throws an exemption your way. . . . .that's a whole other story. Athena, you just saw TCA, to paraphrase: you can trust our pact, as long as your interests don't run too contrary to my own.
#199
Posted 19 March 2004 - 09:11 PM
335pm-425pm: SnakeEyes was on the boards, knew I was on the boards and didn't post--thereby taking away from us, an easy 'caught'. While I can appreciate his desire to obtain an exemption, it is a far cry from the policy he was going to adopt yesterday and make an easy post for a 'caught'.
Not that it matters, but everyone should be aware of this development.
Edited by trs007, 19 March 2004 - 09:20 PM.
#200
Posted 19 March 2004 - 09:35 PM
It's more fun to taunt lesser individuals than help the weedy.
Survival of the best, death for the rest.
#201
Posted 19 March 2004 - 10:30 PM
Well, I wasn't counting on an easy catch anywayNot that it matters, but everyone should be aware of this development.
#202
Posted 19 March 2004 - 11:39 PM
#203
Posted 19 March 2004 - 11:54 PM
#204
Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:22 AM
So no need to post then SnakeEyes
#205
Posted 20 March 2004 - 03:01 AM
#206
Posted 20 March 2004 - 04:11 AM
#207
Posted 20 March 2004 - 04:17 AM
But I do care about 'free' points to these lackeys.
#208
Posted 20 March 2004 - 05:05 AM
The word must be included in an actual post though, correct?
Just something that was noticed and bringing it to your attention for the game.
#209
Posted 20 March 2004 - 05:22 AM
In other words, yes.
#210
Posted 20 March 2004 - 05:28 AM