ROGER FANS UNITE!
#1
Posted 03 October 2001 - 06:20 PM
Well, guess what? I think Roger Moore was a great Bond and his movies were every bit a good (in their own way) as the Connery or current films. I'll go a step further. I think THE SPY WHO LOVED ME is right beside GOLDFINGER as the BEST film in the series...I'd rather watch MOONRAKER than THUNDERBALL any day...And I think OCTOPUSSY is one of the best Bond movies of the whole batch. Frankly, Roger Moore was just plain cool.
Whenever I'm at a Bond event I freely admit to being a fan of Roger and I always find I'm not alone. I even find a few brave soles who'll admit to liking MOONRAKER.
Roger fans, stop being ashamed! There are more (Moore?) of us than we think. I say it is time for us to rise up and cry, "Sit-taaa"!
#2
Posted 02 November 2001 - 01:46 PM
Mister Asterix (17 Oct, 2001 06:30 p.m.):
(Does anybody think it's a good idea to stealthily sneak in to the enemy compound using a giant hot-air balloon blazon with the Union Jack?)
No, but it was only there for the "hot air" joke, which isn't a very good joke anyway.
Actually, Q comes in for a hell of a beating during the Roger Moore years, to whit:
* is repeatedly told to shut up in The Man with the Golden Gun
* looks utterly constipated when Bond drives off in the Lotus in TSWLM
* is responsible for the Bondola
* cannot tell a nose from a banana
* has trouble keeping it up, and probably finishes off Vijay ("He was alive when I found him" - is Q pro-euthanasia? I think we need to be told).
* has a toy dog.
He's only there for cheap laughs.
The trouble with the Roger Moore years is the pervading sense of having a jolly time and no doubt there were larks aplenty but it's all too much pantomime. Octopussy is the worst exponent of this. It's just all over the place. It has some great stuff (Berkoff, and that final click of the detonator on the bomb) and some lousy stuff (the rest of it) and ends about seven times, each time less memorable than the last.
#3
Posted 02 November 2001 - 02:07 PM
Jim (02 Nov, 2001 01:46 p.m.):
Actually, Q comes in for a hell of a beating during the Roger Moore years, to whit:
* is repeatedly told to shut up in The Man with the Golden Gun
* looks utterly constipated when Bond drives off in the Lotus in TSWLM
* is responsible for the Bondola
* cannot tell a nose from a banana
* has trouble keeping it up, and probably finishes off Vijay ("He was alive when I found him" - is Q pro-euthanasia? I think we need to be told).
* has a toy dog.
Looks like the only occasion that Q had a good time of it was Live and Let Die, being left out altogether was the most fun he had during the Moore years.
#4
Posted 02 November 2001 - 02:19 PM
Maybe he was, but they cut the poor guy out because they were still planning his various butt-of-the-joke plot points later on.freemo (02 Nov, 2001 02:07 p.m.):
Looks like the only occasion that Q had a good time of it was Live and Let Die, being left out altogether was the most fun he had during the Moore years.
Having said that though, all of the above mentioned actually helped endear Q to the audiences to a level of, dare I say it, cult status.
#5
Posted 13 November 2001 - 03:14 AM
#6
Posted 13 November 2001 - 03:14 AM
#7
Posted 13 November 2001 - 03:35 PM
I wish Rog never did AVTAK though - Octupussy would have been a good way to leave the series.. I think Roger UNDERSTOOD the role of Bond so well and peaked in TSWLM - which i think is the best performance by anybody as 007.
Roger rules!!!
#8
Posted 20 January 2002 - 02:22 PM
I think Brosnan could be better served by a better director. His work in Thomas Crown and Tailor of Panama shows that he can be in a better all round film. In TWINE, he was obviously directed to be more earnest and try harder and push, push - when in actual fact if he is told to relax and be more self assured in his character's ability, then I reckon he could be classed as the best Bond.
At the moment though, the potential is there, the realisation is not.
Ref. Moore, great. A cocksure son of a bitch who was a delight to watch, aided by some of the best lines delivered in the true Moore fashion. But then he was acting as Moore acting as Bond. He was more of a star status celebrity with presence and relied purely on that. Brosnan is more of an actor type chap, probably without the same presence but maybe with more acting ability.
#9
Posted 20 January 2002 - 07:56 AM
I admit I don't have many of his films near the top of my rankings, but I have him runnign neck and neck with Connery on best Bond stakes, both different, but both very good.
Adam, yeah, I argee that Brosnan is overrated, but I wouldn't say 'way' overrated. He's been pretty impressive and seems to have most of the right atributes, but I do get a little perplexed when people act likes hes the Second Coming.
#10
Posted 02 January 2002 - 07:00 PM
#11
Posted 02 January 2002 - 08:34 PM
#12
Posted 02 January 2002 - 09:36 PM
#13
Posted 20 January 2002 - 07:46 AM
I personally think Moore's the most enjoyable Bond to watch. However, I do like every actor who's played Bond, (though Brosnan is way overrated)
#14
Posted 18 January 2002 - 05:55 AM
#15
Posted 03 October 2001 - 08:43 PM
#16
Posted 21 January 2002 - 07:58 AM
#17
Posted 03 October 2001 - 09:23 PM
In fact, what is often dubbed as Roger's worst film, AVTAK, was the first of his movies that I had ever seen and I enjoyed it thinking it was pretty damn good. I really like TMWTGG despite how it is often rated.
A Moonraker fan, never. It was not Roger Moore's fault that I don't like this one but I think its just a bad film, regardless of who played in it (but I do love the pre-title sequence), I prefer my Bond to be a little more down to earth. That's why Octopussy and FYEO are the best of the Moore era for me. TSWLM a close third.
#18
Posted 03 October 2001 - 09:44 PM
#19
Posted 03 October 2001 - 11:27 PM
But I do regard Moore quite highly. I like his interpreation of Bond. Yes there are moments where I cringe, especially in OP when we get the Tarzan noise. I hate that bit to death.
As for the TSWLM. Well Zencat, I couldn't say if it was my favourite Bond film. It is my favourite Moore film. But I don't even know which is my favourite Bond film. TSWLM is definetley a contender!
#20
Posted 05 January 2002 - 05:29 AM
#21
Posted 04 October 2001 - 12:40 AM
I also don't think that Roger Moore really overstayed his welcome as Bond, unlike how many people like to stay. Every one of his films was enjoyable in some way. I mentioned in an above post my disliking about Moonraker but it still has parts I like, the teaser, Bond's investigation of Drax's estate, and the jungle boat chase.
#22
Posted 05 January 2002 - 08:11 PM
#23
Posted 04 October 2001 - 01:39 AM
However, I do criticise or applaud things when I feel its required, with anything.
Rog's Bond wasn't the best or the worst, just different.
- He had Bond smoking cigars instead of cigarettes.
- His Bond was more fair complexioned, not dark.
- His Bond developed a more aristocratic bearing (less working class?).
- His Bond tended to ware mostly light coloured attire.
- His Bond tended to be more fashion conscience (as a result of Rog choosing the wardrobe himself).
- His Bond brought more humour into the series, which was the norm in his previous roles. So no surprises there then.
Any gripes? Not really.
- He just got too old for the part. Octopussy should have been his last. After that he looked like 0070.
- The humour (the movie's, not Moore's) sometimes got too childish. The camera zooming in and out on the employee's chest in Octopussy was too much for a Bond Movie.
Moore's fan base was needed at a time when EON were having troubles finding the right Bond. Lazenby didn't work out, Connery was paid a cool mil for DAF, and was offered a staggering (at the time) 5.5 mil to do LALD but turned it down. So EON were really desperate.
Then along came Roger when The Persuaders got cancelled.
And, hey presto! Instant Bond. Just add short hair.
Roger was Bond in everyone eyes for longer than any other (12 years), and probably will be for a long time.
So, he was Bond to a whole generation.
LONG LIVE ROGER MOORE AS JAMES BOND.
#24
Posted 09 October 2001 - 11:59 PM
#25
Posted 10 October 2001 - 12:45 AM
When Roger became Bond he hooked in a lot of parents who enjoyed his earlier work. My mother litterally drooled over him.RossMan (10 Oct, 2001 12:59 a.m.):
Surely there must be more Roger Moore fans here than us.
I pretended not to like Bond because I didn't want to agree with my parents tastes.
I think a few of us out there still don't want to admit they like him.
#26
Posted 10 October 2001 - 12:44 PM
I'm getting off track, but what I mean is that, yeah, I'm a Moore fan. My favorite ? Well, its Connery and him one and two for sure, I seem to rotate between those two as my favorite, depending on who I saw in a Bond film the most recently.
#27
Posted 10 October 2001 - 04:51 PM
1. The Spy Who Loved Me
2. Octopussy
3. Moonraker
4. Live and Let Die
5. The Man with the Golden Gun
6. For Your Eyes Only
7. A View to a Kill
I know people may freak at how low FYEO is on my list... Don't get me wrong, I like FYEO and think it's a very good "Bond film", but I don't think it's a great "Roger Moore Bond film", if you understand what I mean.
#28
Posted 16 January 2002 - 01:11 AM
Everytime I talk about Bond to my friends, most of them always think of Sean Connery.
IMO, I think Roger is the best Bond, always my fav.
His light-hearted, english comedic ways was just what I always thought James Bond should be.
#29
Posted 11 October 2001 - 01:17 AM
2. LALD (the song, the music, the chases)
3. M (Star Wars after dinner mint)
4. FYEO (back down to earth , mediteranean settings)
5. O (didn't like the Indian parts)
6. AVTAK (he looked 0070 years old)
7. TMWTGG (planned too quickly, poorly conceived)
#30
Posted 17 February 2002 - 01:00 AM