Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Pierce Brosnan OBE ?!


137 replies to this topic

#61 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 02:41 PM

Originally posted by Dunphboy007

they were regarded more as British films back in the day, and now, in the age of the Hollywood blockbuster, a rank to which Bond is associated, they are thought of as more US or US/UK films. Am I wrong?


I think you're right (although I'm aware that your question is directed at Simon). Back in the day, they were more widely regarded as British films. Leonard Maltin cites them all as British, apart from THE SPY WHO LOVED ME, MOONRAKER, GOLDENEYE, TOMORROW NEVER DIES and THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH (DIE ANOTHER DAY wasn't released in time for the 2003 Movie & Video Guide), which are all considered American.

#62 mccartney007

mccartney007

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3406 posts
  • Location:Los Angeles, California

Posted 15 July 2003 - 04:26 PM

Originally posted by Jim
Fact: I have met Pierce Brosnan three times

Opinion: He has behaved wretchedly on each occasion


I've met Pierce Brosnan several times, and each time he was a pleasant person. I even received a nice letter from him when he was filming Evelyn in Ireland. Everyone I've ever talked to that has met Pierce has said what a nice person he is. Which leads me to think that perhaps he behaved wretchedly because of the person he was around?

#63 Turn

Turn

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6837 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 15 July 2003 - 04:36 PM

Originally posted by Feral
Well, hell. At least he does something with his obscene amounts of cash. You do realize that 99.9% of celebrities don't give a damn about charities or anyone other than themselves, their cars, and their condos...right? If he is so evil, why not do as everyone else and do nothing at all?


That's a pretty sweeping statement. There are lots of celebs out there who give money to charities and individuals without going public about it. Some use their celebrity to endorse certain things while others prefer to do so privately.

I was amazed once when I was at a luncheon with a professional racer who was doing a promotional appearance where I work. When it came time to pay, he actually pulled out his wallet to pay for his own meal even though one of his sponsors was there and they actually picked up the tab. It was refreshing to see he didn't expect somebody else to cater to his needs.

#64 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 04:45 PM

Originally posted by mccartney007

perhaps he behaved wretchedly because of the person he was around?


That's pretty insulting. Do you know Jim? If not, who are you to imply that he might be an unpleasant so-and-so, whose nastiness provoked Brosnan into bad behaviour?

#65 Sigma

Sigma

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 51 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 05:08 PM

Having read all these posts, i've gotta say that it's unfortunate to label someone in such a way as Jim has based on only a few short meetings.
We're all of us made unfortunate/offensive/unpleasant comments at points, even those of us who are pretty decent people.
None of us know Mr Brosnan, and so can't hold such an extreme opinion.

And he really does deserve this 'award' more than those such as David Beckham.

#66 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 15 July 2003 - 05:24 PM

That McCartney bloke is spoiling for a fight if you ask me- he should watch his mouth, but presumably because he's a staff member he's allowed to insult the users. Yes?
And I don't see why its so wrong to get a sense of how pleasant a person is after meeting him several times- didn't the maccafan do this himself? Perhaps he's a really bad judge of character? Perhaps its all a matter of opinion and shouldn't come down to petty insults?

And, although Beckham doesn't really deserve it either, at least he has brought millions of pounds of cash and jobs into the country through his work and exceptional talents. The Bond films would arguably have done roughly the same amount of business with or without Brosnan.

#67 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 15 July 2003 - 05:40 PM

Originally posted by Jim
Fact: I have met Pierce Brosnan three times

Opinion: He has behaved wretchedly on each occasion

Really?

Care to give the details?

I've seen Pierce. Never met him. He seemed nice to me. I did met Dalton. He was very cool.

The guy I have a small problem with is Robert Davi. I met him at the LTK premiere and he was kind of "wretched." I had an extra LTK program and he took it from me and gave it to his friend. He didn't even really ask. He just said, "Give me that." Talisa Soto was standing there and I think she was sort of embarrassed for me. Who knows, maybe he thought I worked there. Why else would I be holding three programs? :)

What

#68 Dr. Tynan

Dr. Tynan

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3456 posts
  • Location:Was on Saturn, now back in Belfast, Northern Ireland

Posted 15 July 2003 - 06:12 PM

Thank you Xen and Genre Writer. :)

I love this fighty threads. They're pretty savage. :)

Jim, just outta nosiness what else did Brozz do :)

#69 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 06:13 PM

Originally posted by zencat

Really?  

Care to give the details?


Jim's already mentioned Brosnan's "Don't get up" quip. I mean, come on, if you were introduced to a one-legged chap, would you immediately crack a gag like: "Did you drink too much and get legless last night?"?

I guess these superstars think they can get away with saying anything they like to those they view as "little people", who will just be too awed and grateful merely to be in their presence.

I sense that some of the people who have posted on this thread may not have been above such fawning and forelock-tugging when meeting Mr Brosnan and other luminaries of the Bond world.

Originally posted by zencat

Talisa Soto was standing there and I think she was sort of embarrassed for me.  


You've met Talisa Soto? *Explodes with envy* Yep, I'm a hypocrite, especially when it comes to beautiful women.:)

#70 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 15 July 2003 - 06:18 PM

I met Shirley Eaton. Does that count?
She was utterly barking and started talking about her knickers, mind.

#71 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 15 July 2003 - 06:18 PM

Originally posted by Loomis
[B]Jim's already mentioned Brosnan's "Don't get up" quip.../B]

Yikes. I didn't read this before. Yes, that is wretched.

#72 Dr. Tynan

Dr. Tynan

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3456 posts
  • Location:Was on Saturn, now back in Belfast, Northern Ireland

Posted 15 July 2003 - 06:22 PM

Aye but he mentioned 3 times :)

I know what happened on two of the times. What about the other time

#73 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 15 July 2003 - 06:25 PM

It was called TWINE.

See, now you all have me doing it! :)

#74 Dunph

Dunph

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3826 posts
  • Location:Leeds, UK

Posted 15 July 2003 - 06:34 PM

originally posted by marktmurphy:
but presumably because he's a staff member he's allowed to insult the users. Yes?



Dam straight! It's one of the few pleasures we have as staff members. Joke. I don't think Jordan's aware of the circumstances surrounding the meeting. But he does make a valid point nonetheless, how did you react towards him, Jim? Was your impression of him tainted when you met him after saying that?

posted by marktmurphy:
The Bond films would arguably have done roughly the same amount of business with or without Brosnan.


And the British press would have found another footballer to put up on a pedestal. That's a moot point.

posted by marktmurphy:
She was utterly barking and started talking about her knickers, mind.


ROFLMAO! :) :) She always did appear like she was a tad eccentric on interviews! How did you get onto the topic of her knickers?

#75 Jaelle

Jaelle

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1406 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 07:38 PM

Originally posted by Loomis
You've met Talisa Soto? *Explodes with envy* Yep, I'm a hypocrite, especially when it comes to beautiful women.:) [/B]


:) I think we can all relate to that in our own way (oh the things I've sat thru just to watch Dalton!). She's probably the WORST "actress" to appear in any Bond film ever but even this straight female is struck by how unbelievably stunning the woman was. On the LTK dvd, Robert Davi says that when he first saw her he thought "I'd kill for this girl."

I've been reading this thread all day and wondered if I should offer a little personal input about the OBE. My ex-husband (who's still a very good friend) is a Scottish journalist who went to Cambridge. His grandfather was awarded the OBE for special services in WWI. He was a doctor who nearly died of exhaustion taking care of soldiers returned from the war. WWI was when the OBE was created by King George V. To quote the website royal.gov.uk.

"The King recognised the necessity for a new award of honour which could be more widely awarded, in recognition of the large numbers of people in the British Isles and other parts of the Empire who were helping the war effort both as combatants and as civilians on the home front. For the first time, women were included in an order of chivalry, and it was decided that the Order should also include foreigners who had helped the British war effort.

"From 1918 onwards there were Military and Civil Divisions, as George V also intended that after the war the Order should be used to reward services to the State, defined in a much wider sense to acknowledge distinguished service to the arts and sciences, public services outside the Civil Service and work with charitable and welfare organisations of all kinds. The Order of the British Empire is the order of chivalry of the British democracy. Valuable service is the only criterion for the award, and the Order is now used to reward service in a wide range of useful activities. Citizens from other countries may also receive an honorary award, for services rendered to the United Kingdom and its people. There are more than 100,000 living members of the Order throughout the world."

Steven (my ex-) and his friends often joke about how the OBE and the knighthood have deteriorated into an award for anyone "who looks great in the tabloids." It's not quite that bad but they once had me in stitches with this entire riff they'd written about future OBE winners and future knights which they acted out. Madonna, Schwarzenegger, Bugs Bunny, Anne Robinson...

I find that these sorts of awards impress Americans far more than the British, who (in my experience) are not a people who are easily impressed by very much (bless them). As someone said, Idi Amin and Nicolai Ceaucescu got an OBE. There are a lot of other pretty dubious names on the list. I admit, I was surprised to hear that Pierce got one. I mean, Michael Caine I can understand. Peter O'Toole, of course. Albert Finney, maybe Judi Dench, Helen Mirren, Derek Jacobi, Vanessa Redgrave (tho she's got political baggage). But Pierce? I'm a fan of Pierce's but I'm sure Steve will have some great jokes for me tomorrow on the phone when I talk to him and tell him about this latest OBE. The charity stuff is fine but there are plenty of British actors who do just as much if not more.

Regarding Jim's posts re Pierce's behavior toward him.... I don't know much about Pierce as a person (just the general stuff about his first wife's bout with cancer and his many children). But the only time I was turned off by something he did or said was during that documentary "The James Bond Story" in which he laughs with obvious disdain toward the possibility that Dalton and Lazenby have fans. I was surprised by that attitude---I'd always seen him behave with such graciousness in his interviews. I've never seen Dalton or Moore speak that way about their Bond predecessors or successors. Regardless, I've never taken awards like this, or knighthood or the Nobel too seriously. Not when they go around handing them out so capriciously and inconsistently. They once meant something but that was a long time ago.

#76 BONDFINESSE 007

BONDFINESSE 007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4515 posts
  • Location:columbia sc

Posted 15 July 2003 - 08:17 PM

Originally posted by zencat

Yikes. I didn't read this before. Yes, that is wretched.

the thing is i bet all the money that i have the brosnan never made that statement, i know that jim has this nasty feeling for pierce and it really is sad because brosnan has never done anything to him and to slam him with a statement like that is just flat out wrong, pierce would never be that mean in a million years. in this day and age it seems the thing to hate celebraties....to be a hater and try and throw mud on them because we are jealous in some way or other, maybe they have more money or maybe they are more handsome or maybe they live in a great big house that we wish we could so to make ourself feel beter we try and discredit them by making up some god awful stament and it sad that this goes on in the 21st century :mad:

#77 Dr. Tynan

Dr. Tynan

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3456 posts
  • Location:Was on Saturn, now back in Belfast, Northern Ireland

Posted 15 July 2003 - 08:54 PM

Not meaning to offend (quite sincerely), but you'd best be careful with that lie accusation. If Jim can prove he is not lying then he could probably have you for libel.

You might be best to delete the above post or take it back.

Again, I mean no offense, I'm just warning you. :)

#78 BONDFINESSE 007

BONDFINESSE 007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4515 posts
  • Location:columbia sc

Posted 15 July 2003 - 09:07 PM

i still say brosnan never made the comment, here is a man that lost his wife to cancer and knows as well as i do, since i have lost mine to cancer as well, the pains of life and to say pierce was that cold and heartless...no way, he is not like that

#79 Xenobia

Xenobia

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9744 posts
  • Location:New York City

Posted 15 July 2003 - 09:12 PM

Folks...folks. You have all failed the test. What test? The test in debating.

Someone in this thread wanted to have a spirited debate using very strong arguments. That person's arguments were strong, unfortunately in return he or she got personal attacks, and opinions, and innuendo. Not much good for a debate, is it?

Given the standards involved, which constitute fact, it is my opinion Pierce Brosnan deserves the OBE for his charity work, and for his film work. I do not believe he deserves it because he looks good. That's ridiculous, and if that is why we got it, the folks who came up with the idea of "Cool Britainia" should be ashamed of themselves.

Another point, if I may. A personal conversation is never going to be viewed in the same way by the participants. We know Jim's version, chance's are Mr. Brosnan's version will be different. That being said, here and now, with those of us who were not there, we should stand in judgement, nor should accuse anyone of lying.

-- Xenobia

#80 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 15 July 2003 - 09:23 PM

I think this is all getting a little out of control and silly.

#81 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 09:40 PM

Originally posted by Jaelle

the only time I was turned off by something he did or said was during that documentary "The James Bond Story" in which he laughs with obvious disdain toward the possibility that Dalton and Lazenby have fans.  I was surprised by that attitude---I'd always seen him behave with such graciousness in his interviews.  I've never seen Dalton or Moore speak that way about their Bond predecessors or successors.  


I've not seen "The James Bond Story", but I remember seeing a Brosnan interview on TV fairly recently in which he was asked about previous Bond actors. He spoke at length of how much he admired Connery, and it was clear that he saw him as having set the Bond standard to match up to. He uttered a few words in (seemingly grudging) praise of Moore, and dismissed Lazenby as a failure in a way that came across as extremely rude. I don't think he mentioned Dalton at all.

Rule of Professionalism #26: if you have nothing good to say about someone, say nothing.

Rule of Professionalism #54: endeavour to keep the goodwill of your predecessors and successors.

Originally posted by Dr. Tynan

Not meaning to offend (quite sincerely), but you'd best be careful with that lie accusation. If Jim can prove he is not lying then he could probably have you for libel.

You might be best to delete the above post or take it back.


I don't think Jim could have him for libel (and I'm certain he wouldn't want to even if he could), simply because "Jim" is an anonymous user name that cannot identify the person it belongs to. There's also the fact that "BONDFINESSE" or whoever is responsible for the accusation is also an anonymous poster, and lives in a different country.

What would Jim have to gain by lying?

#82 Jaelle

Jaelle

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1406 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 09:48 PM

Originally posted by Loomis
Rule of Professionalism #26: if you have nothing good to say about someone, say nothing.

Rule of Professionalism #54: endeavour to keep the goodwill of your predecessors and successors. [/B]


Quite right, well said. Should be engraved somewhere.

#83 Dunph

Dunph

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3826 posts
  • Location:Leeds, UK

Posted 15 July 2003 - 09:57 PM

I think perhaps we should rename this thread "get a dig at a celebrity." :)

#84 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 10:04 PM

Originally posted by Dunphboy007

Don't base opinion on conjecture, Loomis.  


Okay, fair enough, that was purely my inference. I'll delete that part of my post.

#85 Dr. Tynan

Dr. Tynan

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3456 posts
  • Location:Was on Saturn, now back in Belfast, Northern Ireland

Posted 15 July 2003 - 10:10 PM

Maybe you're right Loomis. I know very little about the law.

Though Jim has given his real name on the site would that make a difference. we know that Jim is Jacques Stewart and anyone who knows Jim will see that accusation and may think Jim is lying and Jim may not be and that would be unfair and Jim's character has been defamed (isn't there such a word). (that's if he is not lying.)

Just thinking of the top of my head, I'm sure I'm wrong.

I'm not saying that Jim is not lying nor am I accusing BondFinesse of making a false accusation, I'm just saying he should be careful, incase Jim's not lying :)

I mean how would I know. :)

#86 BONDFINESSE 007

BONDFINESSE 007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4515 posts
  • Location:columbia sc

Posted 15 July 2003 - 10:28 PM

first off guys all i am saying is what has been said against pierce brosnan is compleately out of whack with the characteristics of pierce brosnan so therefore brosnan is innocent until proven guilty

#87 BONDFINESSE 007

BONDFINESSE 007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4515 posts
  • Location:columbia sc

Posted 15 July 2003 - 10:31 PM

Originally posted by BONDFINESSE 007
first off guys all i am saying is what has been said against pierce brosnan is compleately out of whack with the characteristics of pierce brosnan so therefore brosnan is innocent until proven guilty

or am i to believe that kobe assaulted that young woman? she said he did....does that mean he did because she said so?



NO

#88 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 15 July 2003 - 10:32 PM

Originally posted by Dr. Tynan

Maybe you're right Loomis. I know very little about the law.  


Hey, I know zip about the law, too, Dr. T.

Originally posted by Dr. Tynan

Though Jim has given his real name on the site would that make a difference. we know that Jim is Jacques Stewart and anyone who knows Jim will see that accusation and may think Jim is lying and Jim may not be and that would be unfair and Jim's character has been defamed (isn't there such a word). (that's if he is not lying.)  


Hmmm.... possibly. I suppose in theory Jim might have a case, but I really can't picture any judge not throwing it out instantly. Also, Jim has made his real name known on this site at his own risk. He could have remained anonymous, like most of us, and it was his choice not to do so. That would probably fatally weaken any libel action he were to start (although it's not as though he'd ever start legal manoeuvres over something as ridiculously petty as a CBn flame war).

Frankly, it would seem that Pierce Brosnan has a far stronger case to sue Jim (and maybe myself).

#89 zencat

zencat

    Commander GCMG

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 25814 posts
  • Location:Studio City, CA

Posted 15 July 2003 - 10:49 PM

I don't think lawyers are lining up to take internet newsgroup "libel" cases. And just calling someone a "liar"... Have you ever read some of the talk-backers at Ain't it Cool? The stuff that's said over there is wild (and very funny).

Besides, we all know Jim's real name is...

Pierce Brosnan.

:)


(Okay, that wasn't my joke. I stole it from someone else. They have a case against me now.)

#90 Dunph

Dunph

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3826 posts
  • Location:Leeds, UK

Posted 15 July 2003 - 10:53 PM

Aint It Cool has gone downhill hasn't it? Word is Harry and Co. are now just stooges for the studios. Wouldn't dispute it, but isn't it ironic that they now support what they fought so hard against when they first went online?