It's obvious all the Gardner books are property of EON since at least AVTAK. Most of the films since then borrows from them, as reported on this site in an excellent feature.
It's fair to say by now, the producers just view them as second rate material to draw some ideas from. None of those will ever be adapted in a movie FRWL or DR No style.
All I can say is, by dropping out from adapting all the Fleming originals again one by one and in order, ala Bourne scripts (ie just take what you want from them and change the rest while keeping the title), they have failed to reboot the series for the next 40 years.
QOS should have been Live and Let Die, and so on. It would have by now gotten past the 800 millions dollars box office. People want the real thing, not coke zero.
Using the QOS title says it all. It's back to Brosnan era (thought not of Brosnan fault, his dream was doing CR).
Your comments about the Gardner books being owned by EON is not accurate. I personally interviewed Mr. Gardner many years ago and asked him about his relationship with Cubby and why his books will never be made into cinema:
This is a portion of the interview which can be found at my website:
Dr. Shatterhand: There was a story floating around the Internet years ago which said you and Cubby Broccoli did not get along and that Cubby refused to film your books. Is there any truth to this?
John Gardner: Rubbish. I got on very well with Cubby and we spoke whenever I was in LA. However, as soon as Glidrose announced that they were going to employ someone new to write continuation novels he announced that he would never make a movie from any of them. Indeed why should he? He owned the character rights and didn't need to pay for any books. He could get people within his organisation to write stuff for him at no extra charge.
Dr. Shatterhand: Is it a coincidence that your novel ROLE OF HONOUR has a scene where Bond battles Tahani onboard an airship and in that same year (1985) Eon Productions filmed A VIEW TO A KILL, which also has a final battle scene onboard an airship?
John Gardner: I presume it is a coincidence.
******************
Also, to say that the producers should have started with LALD in the order of the books is silly in my opinion. There is plenty of Fleming elements they can borrow from other novels and stories and still keep the film fresh. QOS is a brilliant film and one of the best in over 40 years.
Again, just because Fleming did it doesn't mean it should be done. I don't think a giant squid fits with Craig's Bond at all, at least not as he's been presented in CASINO ROYALE and QUANTUM OF SOLACE. Heck, I have a hard time seeing that sequence coming off no matter what Bond we're talking about.
Funny, people were saying the same about the torture scene in CR for over 40 years.
I can see them filming this so called Dr. No obstacle course, that ends in a cave where Bond is trapped with this dangerous creature. If done right, the scene could be fantastic and not ridiculous like the para-sailing scene from DAD.