Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Edward Fox does not like Craig


118 replies to this topic

#61 killkenny kid

killkenny kid

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6607 posts
  • Location:Albany, New York

Posted 26 March 2007 - 05:19 AM

And, why should I care what Mr. Fox thinks? :cooltongue:

#62 Santa

Santa

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6445 posts
  • Location:Valencia

Posted 26 March 2007 - 05:24 AM

Calm down, everyone.


Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Some of my friends have surprised me by saying Daniel Craig is plain ugly, and it was "not a Bond movie".


Interesting but please remember not everyone likes it, and they are fully entitled to their opinions, just as we are.

You're absolutely right, but there is expressing your opinion and there's being plain rude. For my part, it's his use of 'I knew Fleming' to try and elevate his opinion to fact that turns this from merely some old codger's opinion into irritating [censored].

#63 DaveBond21

DaveBond21

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 18026 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia (but from the UK)

Posted 26 March 2007 - 05:28 AM

and there's being plain rude



I think that is poetic licence from the person who spoke with Fox.

#64 Mike00spy

Mike00spy

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 577 posts
  • Location:South Florida

Posted 26 March 2007 - 01:58 PM

Am I the first person to point out he wasn't playing Fleming's "M" in NSNA. He was Sir Miles's successor.....

#65 dee-bee-five

dee-bee-five

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2227 posts

Posted 26 March 2007 - 02:22 PM

Am I the first person to point out he wasn't playing Fleming's "M" in NSNA. He was Sir Miles's successor.....


I barely care about NSNA as it is. Can you imagine how little I care who Edward Fox was playing...?

#66 dodge

dodge

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5068 posts
  • Location:USA

Posted 26 March 2007 - 03:20 PM

This is all a shameless publicity stunt to hustle Fox's comeback film, based on a fave Bruce Willis flick and retitled : Blow Hard.

#67 crheath

crheath

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 704 posts

Posted 26 March 2007 - 03:28 PM

My grandfather didn't like Sean Connery either. What else is new?

#68 Mister Asterix

Mister Asterix

    Commodore RNVR

  • The Admiralty
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 15519 posts
  • Location:38.6902N - 89.9816W

Posted 26 March 2007 - 03:36 PM

Well, I don't like Edward Fox, who's nowhere near as talented as his brother. He was also one of the worst things in the dross that was NSNA.

Does that even up the score?

You notice how is is always men who think Craig is ungly


No, you're wrong. It's always UGLY, middle-aged men who think it...


Edward Fox is middle aged? When did 70 become middle aged?

#69 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 26 March 2007 - 03:53 PM

Well, I don't like Edward Fox, who's nowhere near as talented as his brother. He was also one of the worst things in the dross that was NSNA.

Does that even up the score?

You notice how is is always men who think Craig is ungly


No, you're wrong. It's always UGLY, middle-aged men who think it...


Edward Fox is middle aged? When did 70 become middle aged?


If that makes 33 still young, I have nothing to question.

#70 dee-bee-five

dee-bee-five

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2227 posts

Posted 26 March 2007 - 03:58 PM

Well, I don't like Edward Fox, who's nowhere near as talented as his brother. He was also one of the worst things in the dross that was NSNA.

Does that even up the score?

You notice how is is always men who think Craig is ungly


No, you're wrong. It's always UGLY, middle-aged men who think it...


Edward Fox is middle aged? When did 70 become middle aged?


Well, my middle-aged men reference was meant to be generic, but I take your point. Actually, I get the impression Edward Fox was middle-aged at ten...

#71 killkenny kid

killkenny kid

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6607 posts
  • Location:Albany, New York

Posted 26 March 2007 - 04:28 PM

Ugh, there's nothing more inconvenient than an old queen with a head cold.

#72 dee-bee-five

dee-bee-five

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2227 posts

Posted 26 March 2007 - 04:32 PM

Ugh, there's nothing more inconvenient than an old queen with a head cold.


Unless it's a cold queen with an old head... :cooltongue:

#73 Head of S

Head of S

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 217 posts
  • Location:A View To A Kill

Posted 26 March 2007 - 04:42 PM

British actor EDWARD FOX has blasted casting directors on the latest JAMES BOND movie CASINO ROYALE, because he thinks new 007 DANIEL CRAIG is "utterly wrong" for the part.

$600 million box-office says otherwise.

THE DAY OF THE JACKAL star, 68, is disgusted by Craig's appearance, and claims a blond spy would never have been approved by Bond creator IAN FLEMING.
He says of Craig, "So ugly! He is utterly wrong for Bond. The opposite of what Fleming intended, and I knew Fleming."


And yet Fleming was quite happy to sell the rights of Casino Royale and to have it made into a television drama starring CIA* agent 'Card Sense' Jimmy Bond. I also seem to recall that Sean Connery was the opposite of what Fleming intended, until Dr No became a success and suddenly Connery was the best thing since sliced bread. It has been well documented that Fleming was less interested in the artistic rendering of his books on film so long as he was making pot loads of dosh. I'm not sure how well Mr Fox knew Fleming, but I would submit that working for Kevin McClory doesn't really smack of loyalty. Still, everyone is entitled to an opinion.

*CIA - Combined Intelligence Agency, as per Ian Fleming's original novel published by Jonathan Cape. Future editions were changed to Central Intelligence Agency.

#74 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 26 March 2007 - 04:52 PM

1) I never liked Edward Fox, in any of his movies!, he is so self infatuated, i cant wait untill the day he crawls up his own [censored] and dies.

2)Daniel Craig is not ugly at all, he just has rugged and uncommon looks, and to be perfectly frank, personally, i think, out of all of the Bonds, he is the better looking.

3)Everyone has the right to their own opinion, but never, have i seen anyone use a dead man to fight their battles "The opposite of what Fleming intended" :cooltongue: "I knew Fleming" :angry: - he wouldn't know [censored] if fleming approved of Craig because fleming has never seen any of his work.

4) "utterly wrong", i'll tell you whats "utterly wrong", a man who is friends with Fleming and goes off and makes a unofficial movie to rival the franchise (the official franchise what fleming approved of) not only that, go and star in a horrible remake of flemings work.

5) I think Fleming would be really proud of his first novel, FINALLY being made how it should be.

#75 Scamp

Scamp

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 266 posts
  • Location:Behind the wheel of the DBS

Posted 26 March 2007 - 05:59 PM

Hi, I didn't know Ian Fleming (which hasn't kept me awake at night!), I don't know Edward Fox but I do know someone who has met Daniel Craig on numerous occasions (and who is also an ex-serviceman). Not sure how many points that gets me in the scheme of things!

I do think everyone deserves an opinion and that there is a time to express it, like now! My friend who has met Daniel is in the know and repeatedly tells me that he does looks the part and fits many of the "perceived" characterists. Perhaps there is a "universal" actor out there who everyone thinks is correct for the role but I doubt it. Ian Fleming gave very sketchy clues about James Bond, except "the comma" of hair that wouldn't stay in place and I think that is because he wanted us all to almost picture ourselves there doing those things. He concentrated on describing, in incredible detail, everything that Bond was seeing, feeling, eating etc and that was his art. I must say that when I read the Fleming books I still picture Connery but as the John Gardner and Raymond Benson books are more current I picture Craig.

I should apologise in advance as these are My opinions and will, obviously be shot down in flames almost immediately!!!!

Edited by Scamp, 26 March 2007 - 06:00 PM.


#76 triviachamp

triviachamp

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1400 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 26 March 2007 - 09:27 PM

And yet Fleming was quite happy to sell the rights of Casino Royale and to have it made into a television drama starring CIA* agent 'Card Sense' Jimmy Bond. I also seem to recall that Sean Connery was the opposite of what Fleming intended, until Dr No became a success and suddenly Connery was the best thing since sliced bread. It has been well documented that Fleming was less interested in the artistic rendering of his books on film so long as he was making pot loads of dosh.

Didn't Fleming supposedly consider Jimmy Stewart for Bond? (Well they say he really meant Stewart Granger but that would be like saying "Michael Douglas" when you really want Michael Keaton)

If Ratoff's Casino Royale with Susan Hayward (so says Dr. Shatterhand) had been made and been a hit I don't think Fleming would have complained.

I'm not sure how well Mr Fox knew Fleming, but I would submit that working for Kevin McClory doesn't really smack of loyalty.

I was wondering about that as well.

*CIA - Combined Intelligence Agency, as per Ian Fleming's original novel published by Jonathan Cape. Future editions were changed to Central Intelligence Agency.

So this was Fleming's mistake and not the telewriters? I did not know that.

#77 Head of S

Head of S

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 217 posts
  • Location:A View To A Kill

Posted 26 March 2007 - 10:52 PM


*CIA - Combined Intelligence Agency, as per Ian Fleming's original novel published by Jonathan Cape. Future editions were changed to Central Intelligence Agency.

So this was Fleming's mistake and not the telewriters? I did not know that.


It wasn't a mistake, rather an attempt by Fleming, in his first novel, not to explicitly use the name Central Intelligence Agency (although he still used the abreviation). At the time of writing, the agency had only been 'trading' by the name Central Intelligence Agency for less than five years.

Fleming was certainly aware of the various intelligence agencies and in fact contributed to the development of the COI - Office Of Co-ordinator of Information, headed up by William Donovan, which became the OSS - Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the CIA. In July 1941, by way of thanks, Donovan presented Fleming with a .38 Police Positive Colt revolver, inscribed 'For Special Services'. [Although never a Director of Central Intelligence, a portrait of Major General William J Donovan hangs in the DCI Portrait Gallery at CIA HQ.] On his return to London from the US, Fleming went via Lisbon to check on Operation 'Golden Eye'. Another story for another thread...

#78 triviachamp

triviachamp

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1400 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 26 March 2007 - 10:56 PM

So a little artistic licence by Fleming then? Kind of like how in Dr. No (the movie) Bond worked for MI7.

#79 mister-white

mister-white

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 231 posts

Posted 26 March 2007 - 11:03 PM

He said that Craig is the complete opposite of what Fleming intended. Now, I haven't read much of what Fleming originally wrote, but Craig seems perfect when you look at what I've read that Fleming wrote. He definitly didn't intend him to be like Connery was in NSNA, which isn't really a "Bond movie" anyway.

#80 StephS

StephS

    Cadet

  • Crew
  • 9 posts

Posted 27 March 2007 - 01:37 PM

Well, you know what they say:

Opinions are like :lol: holes; everyone has one, and they ALL stink! :cooltongue: :angry:

Edited by StephS, 27 March 2007 - 01:38 PM.


#81 Number 6

Number 6

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6555 posts
  • Location:Born & raised in N.Y.C., lives in Dallas

Posted 29 March 2007 - 12:32 PM

Calm down, everyone.


Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Some of my friends have surprised me by saying Daniel Craig is plain ugly, and it was "not a Bond movie".


Interesting but please remember not everyone likes it, and they are fully entitled to their opinions, just as we are.




Well said, DaveBond.

I thought that Craig did a sensational job in the role yet he still remains an acquired taste for me cosmetically. Doesn't change the fact that I'm awaiting the follow-up with great anticipation.

#82 stamper

stamper

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2994 posts
  • Location:Under the sea

Posted 29 March 2007 - 03:21 PM

Edward Fox was one ugyly, stern M.

Fleming would have disaproved.

Bernard Lee forever, Mr Edward the ugly fox for never

#83 David_M

David_M

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1064 posts
  • Location:Richmond VA

Posted 29 March 2007 - 03:38 PM

Well of course, neither Mr Fox nor any of Fleming's other acquaintances are qualified to say what Ian would have thought of an actor who wasn't even born in the author's lifetime! That's pretty silly.

And anyway, ugliness is in the eye of the beholder; Fleming himself described Bond as looking like Hoagy Carmichael, only with a scar! I dare say if that's Ian's idea of handsome, he doesn't have much company (with the possible exception of Hoagy's mom).

Personally, I think Craig's a lot like Dalton. Neither resembles my mental image of Bond, but both of them make me forget that a few minutes into their performances. I'd rather see a Bond actor who can act the part despite not totally looking it, than one who looks perfect for it but still can't turn in a convincing performance anyway. Kudos to EON for picking a guy based on ability rather than his headshot.

#84 Number 6

Number 6

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6555 posts
  • Location:Born & raised in N.Y.C., lives in Dallas

Posted 29 March 2007 - 04:07 PM

All of the back and forths about Craig's looks are neither here nor there anyway. He has proven that he is a ticket draw now...


As long as the box office takes are as healthy as it was for CR, we'll all have to deal with him at the 007 helm for the duration whether we like it or not.

#85 Anon

Anon

    Discharged

  • Discharged
  • 7 posts

Posted 30 March 2007 - 11:26 PM

Well, you know what they say:

Opinions are like :lol: holes; everyone has one, and they ALL stink! :cooltongue: :angry:


Well, YOURS certainly does.

#86 medrecess

medrecess

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 487 posts

Posted 31 March 2007 - 06:29 AM

Everyone has an opinion.U cant help it.Many ppl like Craig and many dont.some find him ruggedly handsome some find him really ugly.
Its all part of the game called Fame and Success.But the movies a huge success and a lot of positive opinion is coz of that.If Movie did miserably then maybe there wud have been more of the negative opinion.

#87 WhiteKnight2000

WhiteKnight2000

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 301 posts

Posted 31 March 2007 - 08:48 PM

Well I thought Craig was good as Bond, but still a bit on the plain side looks wise. He'd be perfect casting for popeye the sailor man.

#88 Muldoon

Muldoon

    Recruit

  • Crew
  • 4 posts

Posted 13 April 2007 - 06:34 AM

I thought Craig did an awesome job. He's now my favorite of all the Bond actors.

#89 Sigma7

Sigma7

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 230 posts
  • Location:Vauxhall Cross

Posted 13 April 2007 - 06:54 AM

Well imo from what i gather from the fleming books, Bond is not a pretty boy, i think its the portrayal of the films by the various actors that have got us locked into that way of thinking that bond must be handsome ( i dont think hoagy carmichael is that good looking, so then DC is actually a good choice of bond then )

#90 0024

0024

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 194 posts
  • Location:New York

Posted 24 April 2007 - 10:02 PM

Judi Dench is M, now. Right? Not Edward Fox? Right. Okay. Yea, it's really not important what Fox thinks.