
Has Die Another Day replaced Goldfinger as the model Bond film
#1
Posted 21 March 2003 - 12:17 AM
#2
Posted 21 March 2003 - 12:20 AM
#3
Posted 21 March 2003 - 01:16 AM
#4
Posted 21 March 2003 - 01:37 AM
#5
Posted 21 March 2003 - 01:39 AM
#6
Posted 21 March 2003 - 02:06 AM
#7
Posted 21 March 2003 - 02:10 AM
#8
Posted 21 March 2003 - 02:35 AM
#9
Posted 21 March 2003 - 04:26 AM
#10
Posted 21 March 2003 - 05:07 AM
If anyone is, it's hard to argue against GoldenEye. It set the standard for pace and action that has been followed in the three other Brosnan outings.
#11
Posted 21 March 2003 - 06:31 AM

#12
Posted 21 March 2003 - 12:48 PM
#13
Posted 21 March 2003 - 01:19 PM
#14
Posted 21 March 2003 - 02:25 PM
Originally posted by Righty007
Die Another Day has NOT replaced Goldfinger as the model Bond film. Goldfinger is a classic, and Die Another Day wasn't that good. If anything The World is Not Enough should be the modern model Bond film.
I don't see your argument. DAD made a lot more money than TWINE, and was a much better picture than TWINE.
#15
Posted 21 March 2003 - 03:16 PM
#16
Posted 21 March 2003 - 10:21 PM
So what if DAD made more money? I'm not saying DAD is a bad movie but TWINE is much better. One of the reasons is TWINE wasn't screwed up by some ****y CGI scenes.Originally posted by DLibrasnow
I don't see your argument. DAD made a lot more money than TWINE, and was a much better picture than TWINE.
#17
Posted 21 March 2003 - 10:56 PM
FRWL, Goldfinger, TLD, Goldeneye -- all classics.
DAD in my opinion is completely over-hyped. It's a downer to think (and then realize) that the Bond producers will try to copy DAD in every future film just to keep the grosses up. It's too damn bad they can't be gutsy and make a 007 film as good as "The Thomas Crown Affair" which was a great mix of sex and style and had you guessing till the end.
#18
Posted 21 March 2003 - 11:09 PM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
...The return of a Large than life villian . After the small scale one from the first two Moore films ( "Live and Let Die" , "The Man with the Golden Gun")...
I have to disagree with that, Baron Samedi and TeeHee were excellent villains in LALD how can you beat a guy if he cant die? (dont get much larger then that) oh well that is just MHO.
#19
Posted 21 March 2003 - 11:35 PM
#20
Posted 21 March 2003 - 11:41 PM
I've never been a great fan of Goldfinger. I think the Bond films should be modeled more on From Russia with Love, and their success therein judged on that standard.
-- Xenobia
#21
Posted 21 March 2003 - 11:55 PM
I totally agree with you.Originally posted by Xenobia
I don't think DAD should be the new model for the Bond films, however, because of huge world wide gross, it probably will be a new model in the worst ways possible -- more CGI, more weird editing, Bond gets caught more often, etc.
-- Xenobia
#22
Posted 22 March 2003 - 03:04 PM
TeeHee die at the end of "Live and Let Die" . Baron Samedi was killed by Bond .Originally posted by superracer0022
I have to disagree with that, Baron Samedi and TeeHee were excellent villains in LALD how can you beat a guy if he cant die? (dont get much larger then that) oh well that is just MHO.
#23
Posted 22 March 2003 - 03:06 PM
"From Russia With Love" is a great film . Yet time and time again post are written about how todays movie going public . Would not sit through that type of Bond film .Originally posted by Xenobia
I've never been a great fan of Goldfinger. I think the Bond films should be modeled more on From Russia with Love, and their success therein judged on that standard.
-- Xenobia
#24
Posted 22 March 2003 - 04:28 PM
The last shot of the movie is Baron Samedi alive and well...
#25
Posted 22 March 2003 - 04:31 PM
Ah ! Dr.Noah that was just a cute way to end the film . Then the train of thought around here is that the dude with the cat and baldhead . In "FYEO" was not Blofeld . Okay have it your way . HE ALIVE .Originally posted by Dr Noah
"Baron Samedi was killed by Bond"
The last shot of the movie is Baron Samedi alive and well
#26
Posted 22 March 2003 - 11:41 PM
What about the times when Bond killed off the villain in a one-on-one fight, rescued his girl and blew out a classic final comment?
I don't know about you, but I hate this whole "independent and emancipated girl" stuff. Nothing against emancipation in the REAL world, but these are BOND movies, they're about JAMES BOND 007 and a co-star (may it be a he or a she) has >nothing< to lose in it.
#27
Posted 23 March 2003 - 04:01 AM

As for strong independent women in Bond, they're not new... exactly what do you think Pussy Galore was? Or Fiona Volpe? Or Aki? Or XXX? Or Melina? Or Octopussy? Or Pam Bouvier? I think you've been reading too many recent press clippings where the Bond girl du jour pronounces she's not like all the other ones that came before her but intelligent and independent yadda yadda.

#28
Posted 23 March 2003 - 04:07 AM
Originally posted by Mourning Becomes Electra
Yeah a return to classics when Bond saved the girl ...like at the end of FRWL, GF, and TB... oh yeah he didn't, they saved him.In contrast Jinx didn't save Bond unless you count the laser fight when he probably could have got out of it, but he did save her at least twice even if you don't count the ending where she was just going to stay in the plane laughing while it crashed. He saved Wai Lin too on several occasions. In fact the only Bond girl to "save" Brosnan's Bond was Natalya with the helicopter at the end and she wasn't a spy, just an "ordinary" girl.
As for strong independent women in Bond, they're not new... exactly what do you think Pussy Galore was? Or Fiona Volpe? Or Aki? Or XXX? Or Melina? Or Octopussy? Or Pam Bouvier? I think you've been reading too many recent press clippings where the Bond girl du jour pronounces she's not like all the other ones that came before her but intelligent and independent yadda yadda.Yeah there were some dumb useless bunnies along the way (mostly in the early 70's) but most Bond women have been smart, adventurous and capable, and that's just not in the films but in Fleming's books where he wrote some extraodinary women (espcially for the 50's and 50's) like Gala Brand, Tiffany Case, Domino etc.
I'm with you on this MBE....It always makes me laugh when the newest Bond girl talks about how they are different from all the Bond girls before them, more independent and able to take care of themselves. Even the first Bond girl in the series Honey Rider was an independent, capable and adventurous woman, what about Fiona Volpe, Pussy Galore, Kissy, Tracy, Tiffany Case, Anya Amasova, Holly Goodhead, Melina Havelock, Octopussy, MayDay, Pam Bouvier ---- the whole 007 series is littered with independent, capable, emancipated and strong women who are able to take care of themselves.
As you also pointed out this tradition goes back even further to the 1950s when Fleming wrote strong female characters into his novels.
#29
Posted 23 March 2003 - 10:49 AM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
For years "GoldFinger has been labelled the prototype James Bond film . It according to legend had the right mixture of action . Sex , best Bond babes (Pussy Galore ) . Best car (Aston Martin DB5 ) . Best Villians ( Gert Frobe as Goldfinger ) . And minor villians ( the Chinese , North Koreans , Oddjob ) . Has "Die Another Day " replaced this film as the model James Bond film for the 21st century ?
Don't make me laugh. DAD was good, but let's get real.
#30
Posted 23 March 2003 - 05:55 PM
i never stated or implyed that TeeHee or Baron Samedi were not excellent vilians. But compared to the likes of Blofeld . They were small time .Originally posted by superracer0022
I have to disagree with that, Baron Samedi and TeeHee were excellent villains in LALD how can you beat a guy if he cant die? (dont get much larger then that) oh well that is just MHO.