OHMSS -- Does It Compare To The Top Two ?
#31
Posted 07 April 2003 - 06:01 PM
#32
Posted 14 April 2003 - 07:23 PM
Each time I watch the film, all I can think is what a huge shame that George Lazenby didn't do anymore films. He would have got better and better.
#33
Posted 17 April 2003 - 12:17 AM
#34
Posted 17 April 2003 - 04:24 PM
OHMSS is the film that I think would have made Fleming most proud. It follows the book completely, and that's why the film is so pure Bond! No gadgets and no fantastic car... It's not even Bond that drives in the car chase. Even more brilliant!
It has the best gunbarrel scene ever, the best titles, the best title song and the best ending!
What makes FRWL a better film is the actors and the characters. The time Bond spends up in Piz Gloria is not very good either...
#35
Posted 17 April 2003 - 05:36 PM
Personally, I really love OHMSS, it ranks up there with TSWLM as my two favorite James Bond movies.
--I think it had one of the most beautiful Bond girls in the series in Diana Rigg and it's not hard at all to believe that James Bond would end up falling in love and marrying the enchanting and gorgeous Tracy.
-- The skiing scenes are some of the best and the Alpine scenery is truly awe-inspiring.
--Bond has to rely on his wits and brawn to get out of situations rather than simply pulling out the latest of all gadgets.
The action is more small scale than in other outings but Director Peter Hunt made a good decision when deciding to stick close to the plot structure of the book. The only part of the movie where it seems to drag is the bit at Piz Gloria with all those girls. But, once Bond escapes and is on the run it really picks up speed again and never lets up.
The fact that retailers were shocked at how much demand there was for OHMSS when it was first released on DVD shows that it has gone through a revisionist stage and is now more highly regarded than on its original release in 1969.
#36
Posted 17 April 2003 - 05:41 PM
Okay beautifully written post . One question . Why is OHMSS still the bastard child of the Bond franchise ? The film made the art house film circuit here in NYC Area . And was sold out .Originally posted by DLibrasnow
The fact that retailers were shocked at how much demand there was for OHMSS when it was first released on DVD shows that it has gone through a revisionist stage and is now more highly regarded than on its original release in 1969.
#37
Posted 17 April 2003 - 08:00 PM
Originally posted by kevrichardson
Okay beautifully written post . One question . Why is OHMSS still the bastard child of the Bond franchise ? The film made the art house film circuit here in NYC Area . And was sold out .
It's only the bastard child, as far as I'm concerned, among the general audience and casual fans. The hardcore fans love OHMSS for the most part, or those who don't are few and far between.
Just like anybody who goes to see a Julia Roberts or Tom Cruise movie or any big star just because they are big names and have a new movie, it can also mean their movie still stinks but people will flock to it anyway. Why else would anybody have seen Maid in Manhattan?
Most general movie fans want their Connery, Moore or Brosnan as Bond. There is comfort in familiarity and since Lazenby, and for the most part Dalton, is a nobody, they dismiss OHMSS. Their loss. On the other hand, I've heard people who have seen it and give it a chance really like it.