Live And Let Die, followed by A View To A Kill.
It's ridiculous how much hate AVTAK gets. It's such an entertaining entry and I will never understand the harsh criticism towards it.
Um.....well, Maybe it's the bored and creaky geezer Roger Moore, the horrible back projection action scenes, Tanya Roberts as the dumbest, most bimbo-ish Bond girl ever, Grace Jones (yuck), California Girls? Any of this ringing a bell?
For me, I think For Your Eyes Only is the best Moore movie. The least embarrassing and silly movie from an embarrassing and silly era.
I've heard the same criticisms every time, and pretty much none of them affect my enjoyment of the film as a whole.
To break them down:
Roger's age - Never bothered me whatsoever
Stacey Sutton - Granted, she's not a good bond girl. But the film has so many redeeming features, like a great villain, locations and action - that I overlook Stacey
California girls - The worst part of the movie, but it's only a few seconds long. It ruined the PTS yes, but it did not ruin the movie
Grace jones - I thought she was an interesting character
"The horrible back projection action scenes" - I don't even know what you mean by this. The action scenes looked fine to me, and no worse than any other bond movie
Basically, AVTAK does have a few flaws, but every single bond film in the existence of bond films do too. Let's look at TMWTGG... slide whistle on the car stunt is just as bad as california girls on AVTAK. Mary goodnight is just as bad as Stacey. Let's look at FYEO... Bibi is just as bad as Stacey. Let's look at OP... Tarzan yell is just as bad as california girls. Let's look at MR.... Jaws love scenes and the whole space sequence are far worse than anything in AVTAK. See what I'm saying? Every bond film is flawed. AVTAK just has too many great things in it for the 'flaws' to ruin the movie for me. It's fun, entertaining, and exciting. Underrated for sure.
Edited by Jarvio, 14 October 2012 - 02:25 PM.