How would you improve LTK?
#1
Posted 29 January 2003 - 11:19 AM
Personally i would cut out the whole bar room brawl scene. It does not flow well with the rest of the movie.
Bond visiting several more exotic locations may have also helped the look of the film.
What would you do?
#2
Posted 29 January 2003 - 11:34 AM
Perhaps some locations or scenes in London or anywhere in Britain.
Change the whole "drugs" plot idea - a story centered around espionage in the US where Leiter gets tortured by enemy agents after a mission goes wrong......and Bond seeks revenge.
#3
Posted 29 January 2003 - 11:48 AM
It is very hard for me to think what I'd change in LTK. I think I would not change it. I love it too much.
But I have to watch it next weekend...maybe I can then suggest something. =)
#4
Posted 29 January 2003 - 01:49 PM
LTK needed the real james bond, not a character who is completely different to everything we've been watching for the last 15 films. it needed a more exciting plot (drug lords in a bond movie is hardly thrilling) and it could have used a score that didnt sound exactly like every other 80's action movie.
i do like the bond girls and Q in LTK though, so the movie aint all bad.
#5
Posted 29 January 2003 - 03:22 PM
#6
Posted 29 January 2003 - 05:45 PM
Well, ONE thing. At the end I wouldn't have had Felix so upbeat in his hospital bed, I would have had him a little more somber and reflective - and genuinely thankful and appreciative of what Bond did on his behalf.
Other than that I wouldn't change a thing. It's nearly perfect as it is.
#7
Posted 29 January 2003 - 09:05 PM
#8
Posted 29 January 2003 - 09:12 PM
Originally posted by Turn
Other than a John Barry score, how about some acting lessons for Talisa Soto.
True
#9
Posted 29 January 2003 - 09:16 PM
#10
Posted 29 January 2003 - 09:21 PM
#11
Posted 30 January 2003 - 04:54 PM
LTK, for me, is nearly perfect as it is.
#12
Posted 30 January 2003 - 05:15 PM
#13
Posted 30 January 2003 - 08:19 PM
At least Roadhouse is funny in a dumb kind of guilty pleasure way.
#14
Posted 31 January 2003 - 04:55 PM
That's a shame.
When you miss out on all the subtleties of LTK it must seem like just another 80's cop movie - of course if you pick up on them then LTK comes across as one of Bond's finest moments.
And, IMO, Dalton and Davi give two of the best performances of the entire Bond series in LTK.
#15
Posted 31 January 2003 - 06:07 PM
Oh... I did think of one more thing. I didn't really like the bit where the Bond theme plays along with the bullets hitting the truck. Don't know why, just seems silly to me.
But those little quabbles aside, LTK is still my favorite Bond film.
#16
Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:15 PM
Just an idea, don
#17
Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:31 PM
thats why bond stands out from all other hero,s bond is a sharp dressed man and they did not do that with dalton
#18
Posted 31 January 2003 - 07:38 PM
#19
Posted 31 January 2003 - 09:03 PM
Originally posted by BONDFINESSE 007
i would first start by dressing bond the way he is ment to be dressed and that is in his suit and tie, thats one reason i love him so >here is a man who does his job, runs around the world gets put in the craziest situations jumps around, falls around all in a suit and tie
thats why bond stands out from all other hero,s bond is a sharp dressed man and they did not do that with dalton
But by saying this then you would have to throw out many of Brosnan's films. He is hardly in a suit and tie in the climaxes of three of his four films. And how about that Cuban shirt.
#20
Posted 31 January 2003 - 09:14 PM
yeah but i am talking overall, he is a suited heroOriginally posted by Turn
But by saying this then you would have to throw out many of Brosnan's films. He is hardly in a suit and tie in the climaxes of three of his four films. And how about that Cuban shirt.
#21
Posted 01 February 2003 - 10:31 AM
I don't think it's required for Bond to wear a suit all the time. Brosnan does the same thing, and I think he does it well. You can't expect the man to be running around in a suit and tie 24/7 now, can you?
#22
Posted 01 February 2003 - 05:33 PM
#23
Posted 01 February 2003 - 10:49 PM
Originally posted by B5Erik2
Somebody didn't "get it."
That's a shame.
When you miss out on all the subtleties of LTK it must seem like just another 80's cop movie - of course if you pick up on them then LTK comes across as one of Bond's finest moments.
And, IMO, Dalton and Davi give two of the best performances of the entire Bond series in LTK.
I am with you on this fact, Erik.
Davi, in articular, was definitely one of the nastier Bond villians of recent memory. The ones in all the Brosnan films, although geared for the times, were wimpy and arrogant, at best. They all have henchmen to do thier "nasty work" FOR them. The only exceptions that I recall were Goldfinger, Largo and Blofeld himself. And I wasn't impressed with ANY of them. I know times have changed, but there still must be a FEW untapped fruitcakes around THAT WILL GO UP AGAINST BOND PERSONALLY. Hell, call up "Scary Gary Oldham", if you want a lunatic villian with real screen presence that won't hesitate to pull that trigger himself. Make him a Blofeld descendent or whatever. Anyone see his performances in "The Professional" or "The Fifth Element"? I rest my case.
Davi was sinister and mean. Had that crazy look. But he had style and class, which is rare for a drug lord. Loved the brief "friendly interplay" between Davi and Dalton before all hell broke loose. As for Del Toro, yes, he could have used more screen time for sure. That is one crazy looking and creepy guy. Excellent actor, who was just starting to pop up a lot then.
I also never understood the "Miami Vice" comparison/criticism.
But the comment about Talisa Soto's acting....well, all I can say is, Shakespeare, it wasn't. She could have taken a NAP through the entire film and STILL would've come off far better than the so-called "experienced" Tanya Roberts in AVTAK. That was one HORRID performance. Soto's MUCH more exotic and prettier. I have since seen her in 2 other films and trust me, she has far more range than she was allowed in LTK.
I do agree that Felix was a bit to "happy" for a man who just lost a leg and a new bride. Not too real. Let's just assume he was shot up full of Morphine or whatnot. (THAT will make ya happy and not to concerned about your problems! LOL!).
Overall, this will always be one of my all time favorites. This one truely paved the way for the '90s Bond, PB. But if TD had done more films, I sure would've supported them.
#24
Posted 02 February 2003 - 01:32 AM
#25
Posted 02 February 2003 - 02:27 AM
The "Miami Vice" criticism is just lazy and wrong. So LTK is partly set in Florida and deals with Latin American drug lords, that hardly makes it "Miami Vice". In terms of storytelling, look and feel, it bears absolutely no relation to that TV show. After all, Bond doesn't walk around in a cream designer suit with the sleeves rolled up and a T-shirt underneath, or wear loafers with no socks. One might as well compare, say, THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH to "Dallas" (both dealing with dysfunctional family dynamics and scheming within the oil industry - dramatically, TWINE is on pretty much the same level as "Dallas" in my book, but that's another post).
And surely if any Bond film has a horrible 80s feel, it's A VIEW TO A KILL, by a mile! A synth-heavy song by Duran Duran! Babes with big hair! The girls in the opening titles sequence wearing what looks like neon lipgloss! Grace Jones! A peroxided Christopher Walken! Tanya Roberts (at the time practically a genre unto herself with sword and sandal fantasy dross like THE BEASTMASTER and SHEENA)! Excitement over microchips! There's even a small role for Dolph Lundgren!
With ingredients like that, they need only have added to the mix, say, Brigitte Nielsen, Molly Ringwald and a bunch of coke-snorting Brat Packers, and a song by Cyndi Lauper for AVTAK to have been the ULTIMATE 80s movie.
If anything, though, I'd say that LTK has much more of a 90s feel than an 80s one. In content, look and atmosphere, it stands apart from all the other 80s Bonds, including its immediate predecessor, THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS. Watching the film, one gets a sense of the series being groomed for a new decade and era - we all know what happened to the franchise following LTK's release, but the filmmakers' good intentions are apparent, nonetheless. Following the "down-to-earth" path opened up by TLD, LTK made the final break with the juvenile burlesque of late-period Moore, and the 90s Brosnan films built on the Dalton Bonds' grittier, more "serious" and "emotional" model, adding more glitz and crowd-pleasing stunts to create today's winning formula. It's easy to imagine GOLDENEYE, TOMORROW NEVER DIES and THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH as Dalton vehicles (much more of a stretch to picture Dalton in DIE ANOTHER DAY, though). With hindsight, LTK bears much closer relation to a 90s Bond film than the other 80s outings. Beating it with the stick of 80s-ness is as wrong as shouting "Miami Vice".
Like B5Erik2, I feel that LTK is nearly perfect as it is. However, since this thread asks us what we'd change, I'd have done the following:
- Cast a younger actor as Leiter. Bringing back Hedison was all very well for us fans, but he looks so much older than Dalton that it's hard to buy them as contemporaries and best buddies (uncle and nephew, maybe). And neither, frankly, is it easy to swallow the idea of this Leiter marrying a young beauty.
- Included a scene in which we really get a feel for the friendship between Bond and Leiter, maybe by having them talk about old times and chuckle over past scrapes and saving each other's bacon. Such a scene would have been difficult to pull off without sinking into sentimentality, but done properly might have worked wonders. The whole film is about Bond throwing everything away to avenge this man, and I don't think we're really made fully aware of why he is prepared to go to such lengths.
- Included a couple of scenes to reassure audiences that this is still the same heroic James Bond everyone knows and loves. Maybe a good old-fashioned unrelated-to-the-rest-of-the-film pre-credits sequence (or perhaps a pre-credits sequence set months before the rest of the movie, in which Leiter saves Bond's life on a mission that has nothing to do with Sanchez - that would have helped explain the highly personal nature of Bond's subsequent mission to avenge Leiter). And sorry to be a sexist, misogynist dinosaur, but I think LTK could also have used a scene or two in which Bond rescued Pam or Lupe from danger of some sort. Damsels in distress, it's an oldie but never fails. As Martini points out, it wouldn't have hurt to have included a few more things to remind viewers that they were watching a Bond film.
#26
Posted 02 February 2003 - 03:04 AM
All points well taken and agreed. There just wasn't quite enough footage between Felix and Bond that makes a viewer totally comfortable with the justificastion for Bond going off the extreme deep end. Not that Dell'as death/Felix's mangling wasn't enough, but Felix and Bond enjoyed a very long association and I agree a not too drawn out "moment" between them prior to the wedding scene would have cemented all the Bond motivation much better. Perhaps such a scene could have occured at the night before Bachelor's party. Nothing mushy-hey, these are GUYS, but the comradieire would have been there to remind the audience these guys were as tight as Bond ever gets with another male.
I do think that the Tracy aspect was implied, but never stated, other than that look Bond had upon discovering Della dead. What was really going through his head then?
Pam Bouvier deserved much more screen time, I agree Lupe was a throwaway part (Buy DAYAM, she sure is fine!). Bond should have saved at east one, and I wouldn't have had Bond and Pam just rush to the "nasty" on the boat after all that wharf bar action. It was way too rushed. No foreplay or build up, as opposed to Maryam D'Obo. Like "Well, aren't we supposed to get NEKKED up in here now?".
I think what would be great (and it was mentioned above) to have all excised footage restored and re-relaease this sleeper masterpiece as an "R". The way it was originally conceptualized. But, I overall loved the personalized aspect.
#27
Posted 02 February 2003 - 03:02 PM
#28
Posted 02 February 2003 - 03:40 PM
I think what would be great (and it was mentioned above) to have all excised footage restored and re-relaease this sleeper masterpiece as an "R". The way it was originally conceptualized.
[/QUOTE]
That's my greatest Bond-related wish!
And what can one say about Talisa Soto? Definitely the sexiest Bond girl ever, in my book. Why do people go on about her supposedly bad performance? I see absolutely nothing wrong with her acting in LICENCE TO KILL. If one wanted to be picky about acting in that film, surely Anthony Zerbe, Wayne Newton, the woman playing Della, and the man playing the head of the Hong Kong agents are all far worse than Soto? And what about the literally dozens of other poor performances in the Bond series? Just check out Vijay Amritraj in OCTOPUSSY!
Soto is great in LTK. She creates an entirely believable character. "Talisa Soto is wooden" is another of those indoctrinated, totally wrong opinions on LTK like "it's just like "Miami Vice"", "it reeks of the 80s" and "Dalton's Bond was too serious".
#29
Posted 03 February 2003 - 04:37 AM
#30
Posted 03 February 2003 - 05:39 PM