Title says it all. Glad to see continuity in writers returning to the Bond novels.
http://www.thebookse...han-cape-404116
Posted 04 October 2016 - 01:08 PM
Title says it all. Glad to see continuity in writers returning to the Bond novels.
http://www.thebookse...han-cape-404116
Posted 04 October 2016 - 01:38 PM
Posted 04 October 2016 - 01:55 PM
It's a welcome surprise to hear this. Trigger Mortis was a pleasure to read. It will be good to have consistency in authors again, and Horowitz deserved the opportunity to write another. They say it's another period piece with unused Fleming content. I wonder if it's set in-between the Fleming timeline again? I'm guessing it will be.
Posted 04 October 2016 - 04:31 PM
Posted 04 October 2016 - 04:32 PM
Splendid. Think he truly deserved it, if it was what he was wanting.
Posted 04 October 2016 - 06:43 PM
Posted 04 October 2016 - 09:42 PM
I'm not happy about it. Given his past remarks about the films and other authors I feel he shouldn't have ben given a second chance.
Posted 05 October 2016 - 06:04 PM
I'm not happy about it. Given his past remarks about the films and other authors I feel he shouldn't have ben given a second chance.
What did he say?
Posted 06 October 2016 - 07:33 AM
Posted 08 October 2016 - 07:04 PM
Happy he is writing a second one, less pleased it will take another year. And are getting Donald Westlakes' dismissed Brosnan 007 script in Book release earlier the same year.
Posted 08 October 2016 - 07:07 PM
No surprise there. I've know about it for some time. Couldn't say anything.
An acquaintance asked me "Are you still into Bond?" "Yes." "Anthony Horowitz is doing a second Bond novel." "Oh. (pause) That doesn't surprise me." "You don't sound terribly excited." A long-winded speech by yours truly about what I felt about AH's bloodless debut effort. (You can read my review here.) Acquaintance clearly didn't want to hear it and so cut me off. Several other details. None of which I can share. Can't say anything else. No, I'm not connected. Just a fluke I happen to know someone who knows someone, etc, etc in the know as they say.
Still keeping my fingers crossed that it will take more chances, be more experimental just as his second Holmes novel was apparently a lot more experimental than his first Tho' not that experimental, mind you.
Posted 08 October 2016 - 07:50 PM
Posted 11 October 2016 - 04:37 AM
Good news. I liked Trigger Mortis.
I also liked his Sherlock Holmes novel, the House of Silk.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Posted 11 October 2016 - 09:17 AM
I just remember some of my gripes...
Let's hope he will improve on his second try. Though I probably will not make reading it a priority, there is still War and Peace, there are some James Ellroys, The Tin Drum, some Stephen Kings. And I could reread some Fleming, too.
Good choices all around!
While I do like continuity with authors continuing to write Bond I am not sold on Horowitz either. For me, TRIGGER MORTIS was a structural mess that never really took flight, and the use of "a previous Bond girl" did not pay off for me either since it was half-hearted and then abandoned.
Well, as long as anything Bond-related is released next year...
Posted 11 October 2016 - 05:17 PM
Posted 11 October 2016 - 07:18 PM
Posted 12 October 2016 - 02:32 PM
True, though the Fleming material in TRIGGER MORTIS was quite fun.The mention of material again that wasn't previously published leaves a bit of an aftertaste. Why not give him free rein to fire away on his own? Horowitz isn't that bad at making up his own stories.
Posted 12 October 2016 - 04:09 PM
I think it's more a good selling point than a comment on Horrowitz as a writer.
Posted 12 October 2016 - 04:33 PM
Posted 13 October 2016 - 11:23 AM
I'm with you on that, Dustin, and I really enjoyed Trigger Mortis.
This whole conversation reminds me of how Sebastian Faulks was "writing as Ian Fleming" when he penned Devil May Care-- he even claimed to have been on the same daily schedule as Fleming. All too gimmicky, if you ask me. (And again, I actually enjoyed Devil May Care more than most.)
Fleming was perfect as Fleming.
When I read Faulks or Horowitz, I'd much rather read unadulterated Faulks or Horowitz. Forcing them to be someone or something they aren't, even if they can do a good job at it, just doesn't sit well with me. Gardner and Benson each did a fine job taking Bond in their own direction (even if some of their efforts were subpar)-- it's a mode the literary Bond should return to.
In fact, I'd argue that EON made the same mistake in trying to make Lazenby too much like Connery. (Or maybe it was Lazenby himself who was the driving force behind all this.) It wasn't until Moore that the Bond actors were able to put their own take on the character.
Posted 13 October 2016 - 09:21 PM
Tbh Horrowitz DOES write as himself, there are many similarities to Alex Rider (the blatant Bond pastiche Horrowitz wrote) and I love that! (giving away my age there) Yes, there is a tenuous quality and occasional temptation to be like Fleming, but mostly he wrote his own novel, using only an idea of Fleming's to write a single chapter, as I'm sure this new book will be.
Posted 14 October 2016 - 08:45 AM
I couldn't tell the difference between the Fleming and Horowitz material, which is a credit to him. I don't have a problem with it.
Posted 18 October 2016 - 06:10 AM
So what's the second round of "previous unpublished material"? Per Fine Ounce?
Posted 18 October 2016 - 06:32 AM
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:26 PM
It could be as simple and minor as Horowitz working in the two short stories that Fleming started, but never completed more than a few paragraphs for. One involved Bond being tutored by a Greek cardsharp, and the other had Bond waking in the morning, dreading the blandness of the average English morning ritual. I think they appeared in Pearson's biography of Fleming, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:53 PM
Posted 19 October 2016 - 12:01 AM
Good call on that, could well be. Though I think that would then really leave a pretty clean barrel...
Yeah, there seems to be little else that we know of. Other than some basic ideas that Fleming scribbled in a journal, like the name "Szasz", or Bond battling a villain below Niagara Falls, and line, "she had a proud mouth like a half-healed wound," and "pain is a private address - only those who've been there know how to find it," or something along those lines.
I used to read a bit of Bond fan fiction years back. I enjoyed quite a bit of it, but found that these lines, and the examples I gave earlier, frequently popped up and got absorbed into it. If Horowitz uses any of it then, for me, it will have that recycled fanfic feeling all over again. Otherwise, I enjoyed Trigger Mortis a lot, and look forward to reading more of his take on Bond, just as I enjoyed his takes on Holmes and Moriarty.
Posted 03 December 2016 - 08:29 PM
No surprise there. I've know about it for some time. Couldn't say anything.
An acquaintance asked me "Are you still into Bond?" "Yes." "Anthony Horowitz is doing a second Bond novel." "Oh. (pause) That doesn't surprise me." "You don't sound terribly excited." A long-winded speech by yours truly about what I felt about AH's bloodless debut effort. (You can read my review here.) Acquaintance clearly didn't want to hear it and so cut me off. Several other details. None of which I can share. Can't say anything else. No, I'm not connected. Just a fluke I happen to know someone who knows someone, etc, etc in the know as they say.
Still keeping my fingers crossed that it will take more chances, be more experimental just as his second Holmes novel was apparently a lot more experimental than his first Tho' not that experimental, mind you.
Posted 04 December 2016 - 11:32 AM
Posted 07 December 2016 - 05:06 PM
Respond to this post by replying above this line
New post on The Spy Command
Horowitz: Four Fleming unused story lines remain
by The Spy Commander
"Sounds like a jolly good time."
Ian Fleming
007 continuation author Anthony Horowitz told the BBC today there are four remaining unused Ian Fleming story lines from an unproduced television project.
"There were five that were discovered quite recently in a bottom drawer," Horowitz said in an interview. "One of which had to do with motor racing, which of course I used in Trigger Mortis but that left four more."
Trigger Mortis was published last year. It was a period story, set in 1957 and picked up shortly after Fleming's Goldfinger novel. Horowitz incorporated Fleming's auto racing plot. Fleming also included the basic racing idea among notes (written on 11 telegram blanks) he submitted to television producer Norman Felton for The Man From U.N.C.L.E.
Ian Fleming Publications has retained Horowitz's services for a new and yet untitled Bond novel, due out in 2018.
Of the four Fleming story lines, "I'm going to use one of them, I haven't decided which one yet, as an opening chapter or second chapter," Horowitz told the BBC.
"There is nothing more exciting in the world than to read something that nobody else has read," Horowitz said of the Fleming storylines.
To read more about the BBC interview, CLICK HERE. It incudes an audio clip running almost two minutes.