Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Skyfall to be 2 hours and 25 minutes


59 replies to this topic

#31 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 07 September 2012 - 11:33 PM

So I guess its a safe bet that SF will have the longest pre title sequence.

I think it will be pretty close to THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH in terms of duration, but not necessarily longer. I'd definitely expect it to be more than than 10 minutes though.

#32 Pussfeller

Pussfeller

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4089 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 07 September 2012 - 11:48 PM

So I guess its a safe bet that SF will have the longest pre title sequence.


I wouldn't make that assumption. It certainly appears that the PTS consists solely of the stuff in Istanbul, and that's a straightforward action sequence. Action scenes are far quicker than scenes involving dialogue. The PTS for TWINE, which lasted about fourteen minutes, was a combination of action and dialogue scenes, most of the time being consumed by jibber-jabber. There's no sign that the Skyfall PTS will involve lengthy dialogue scenes or changes of pace. It looks to be structurally similar to the PTS of Tomorrow Never Dies, i.e. quick cuts between foreign shoot-em-up and British mission control. If the PTS for SF goes longer than ten minutes, I'll be genuinely surprised.

#33 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 07 September 2012 - 11:56 PM


So I guess its a safe bet that SF will have the longest pre title sequence.


I wouldn't make that assumption. It certainly appears that the PTS consists solely of the stuff in Istanbul, and that's a straightforward action sequence. Action scenes are far quicker than scenes involving dialogue. The PTS for TWINE, which lasted about fourteen minutes, was a combination of action and dialogue scenes, most of the time being consumed by jibber-jabber. There's no sign that the Skyfall PTS will involve lengthy dialogue scenes or changes of pace. It looks to be structurally similar to the PTS of Tomorrow Never Dies, i.e. quick cuts between foreign shoot-em-up and British mission control. If the PTS for SF goes longer than ten minutes, I'll be genuinely surprised.

Quite right. The only unknown quantity with this is how long the couple of scenes go on for at the start as Bond discovers Ronson's body and finds that the hard drive has been stolen. Following that it's all action intercut with M monitoring the chase back in London. The chase does have quite a few chapters though, which might drag it out somewhat - car chase through narrow streets, gun battle in the market, motorbike chase across rooftops and through the bazaar, Eve follows the action, the shift of the chase to the train roof, through tunnels and onto the bridge. "All in all, rather stocked"!

#34 S K Y F A L L

S K Y F A L L

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6889 posts
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 08 September 2012 - 03:18 AM

TWINE was I think 17 minutes, it starts at the Bank, then MI6, and then the boat chase. But SF starts with Bond finding a room of bodies, then a car chase, a shoot out, the bike chase onto a train, then they use that excavator to throw Beetles around and finally end up on the roof top fighting each and dodging tunnels.

I haven't seen the storyboards and don't know if this was in them but it seems like Bond uses the excavator, throws cars off and then uses the bucket to catch the train which Patrice disconnected before fixing his cuffs. That could take some screen time but who knows.

But perhaps if it was the longest PTS, EON would announce it...

#35 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 08 September 2012 - 03:37 AM

If it’s action that flows on in one whole sequence, I don’t have an issue with a longer pre-titles. In TWINE they could’ve easily cut away to the title sequence following Bond’s window jump in Bilbao.

#36 S K Y F A L L

S K Y F A L L

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6889 posts
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 08 September 2012 - 08:27 AM

A lot happens in the first scenes of CR maybe it will be that fast pasted but I wouldn't be surprised if it was the longest because of the films overall length.
Should make for a long soundtrack.

#37 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:24 AM

It will probably be one of those opening sequences where it's so smooth and intense we forget we've not had the titles, and so when they appear it will be a nice surpirse that we've not even got past the credits yet!

Perfect time to catch your breath I reckon as I don't think it will let you go...

#38 The Dove

The Dove

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16671 posts
  • Location:Colorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 11 September 2012 - 06:06 AM

Idealy, I think the Pre-title sequence should be NO LONGER than 10 minutes..save the majority of the film's running time for the main body of the film..

#39 DaveBond21

DaveBond21

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 18026 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia (but from the UK)

Posted 14 September 2012 - 01:54 AM

This is great news, and would make Skyfall the longest Bond movie. I also expect a long PTS, around the 15-minute mark.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

#40 The Shark

The Shark

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4650 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:42 AM

Should make for a long soundtrack.


Sure hope not. Almost every Bond since David Arnold took the reigns has been overscored/overspotted. I want lots of silence.

#41 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 14 September 2012 - 06:12 AM

Should make for a long soundtrack.


Sure hope not. Almost every Bond since David Arnold took the reigns has been overscored/overspotted. I want lots of silence.


I absolutely support this, though for different reasons probably. At my age my hearing is no longer my strong sleeve and I've experienced serious difficulties in recent years to clearly hear dialogue over the sound barrier the score provides.

#42 Pussfeller

Pussfeller

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4089 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 14 September 2012 - 06:41 AM

So have I, and I'm only 24. I despise loud scores. That's the main reason I welcome Arnold's departure. He strikes me as a very noisy composer, even by the standards of the times.

#43 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 14 September 2012 - 05:28 PM


Should make for a long soundtrack.


Sure hope not. Almost every Bond since David Arnold took the reigns has been overscored/overspotted. I want lots of silence.


I absolutely support this, though for different reasons probably. At my age my hearing is no longer my strong sleeve and I've experienced serious difficulties in recent years to clearly hear dialogue over the sound barrier the score provides.


Not necessarily a problem with your ears but with the sound mix. Or the cinema´s sound system.

But regarding Arnold - I guess he is merely giving what is expected from him. Newman´s scores, however, tend to be more experimental with sounds and silences - so our wishes probably will come true.

#44 Elmason

Elmason

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 72 posts
  • Location:Durham, UK

Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:24 PM

I've just typed 'skyfall' into google on my Samsung Galaxy S using the samsung browser and the top hit that came back was from the skyfall-movie website which underneath states 1hr 47min PG13. This same search result doesn't occur when I tried my opera browser to do the same. Could be nothing but I don't know

#45 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 27 September 2012 - 06:40 PM

I've just typed 'skyfall' into google on my Samsung Galaxy S using the samsung browser and the top hit that came back was from the skyfall-movie website which underneath states 1hr 47min PG13. This same search result doesn't occur when I tried my opera browser to do the same. Could be nothing but I don't know

This was actually noted a bit further up the thread, and it was suggested that Google had made a mistake as 1 hour 47 minutes was the running time for a movie called WHEN THE SKY FALLS. Not conclusive proof admittedly, but I'd be very surprised indeed if SKYFALL ended up as less than 2 hours long.

#46 Shrublands

Shrublands

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4012 posts
  • Location:Conveniently Near the NATO Base

Posted 27 September 2012 - 07:42 PM

We know how long Skyfall will be - the Odeon and other cinema chains have been given the running time so they can draw up programs and sell tickets.

#47 Iceskater101

Iceskater101

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2398 posts
  • Location:Midwest, MN

Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:14 PM

I am glad that this movie is long. It will have a good plot and it will wrap up well. Bond Movies are meant to be this long.

#48 Mr_Wint

Mr_Wint

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2406 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 30 September 2012 - 09:40 AM

Bond Movies are meant to be this long.

Around 2 hours seems right to me.

#49 S K Y F A L L

S K Y F A L L

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6889 posts
  • Location:CANADA

Posted 30 September 2012 - 09:09 PM


Doesn't this make it SKYFALL longest Bond film of the lot?


Posted Image


This is a great chart, would be great if there was one for the pre title sequences as well.

#50 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 30 September 2012 - 09:37 PM



Doesn't this make it SKYFALL longest Bond film of the lot?


Posted Image


This is a great chart, would be great if there was one for the pre title sequences as well.


I can make one tonight for the pre-title sequences.

#51 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:24 AM

Interesting looking at the chart, I remember people complaining about the short running time for 'Quantum Of Solace', but funny it's only a matter of minutes shorter than 'Dr.No' and 'Goldfinger'.

But I think the pacing let 'QOS' down which maybe why people felt short changed compared to 'Dr.No' and 'GF'. Just me thinking out-loud. :)

#52 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:38 AM

Dr. No doesn't seem like an hour and 49 minutes. It seems more like a standard 2 hour film. Maybe it's just me. QOS felt like a generic action film with a generic run time. Again, maybe it's just me.

#53 thecasinoroyale

thecasinoroyale

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14358 posts
  • Location:Basingstoke, UK

Posted 01 October 2012 - 10:18 AM

I agree - 'QOS' over-loaded on action and fast paced sequences with not much substantial narrative in the midst of it. 'Dr.No' took the time to give us fleshed out characters and had nice balance of espionage scenes and action.

#54 Shrublands

Shrublands

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4012 posts
  • Location:Conveniently Near the NATO Base

Posted 01 October 2012 - 10:34 AM

I think the main problem with QoS is, for all the action and short running time, it feels very, very long – and not in an epic good way.

#55 QOS4EVER

QOS4EVER

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 368 posts
  • Location:Hotel in the middle of the Bolivian Desert

Posted 01 October 2012 - 10:55 AM

The only problem of QOS as I see is that the narrativie is a bit off ,The Action sequences were the best compared to any Bond movie.

#56 Mr_Wint

Mr_Wint

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2406 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 01 October 2012 - 12:52 PM

I think the main problem with QoS is, for all the action and short running time, it feels very, very long – and not in an epic good way.

If you are going to judge them by "feeling", then LTK is by far the longest Bond movie ever. The middle-act feels like an eternity...

#57 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 01 October 2012 - 02:07 PM

Eternity can be over pretty quick then...

#58 Miles Miservy

Miles Miservy

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 683 posts
  • Location:CT

Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:00 PM

Ever since the writers incorporated the PTS into the plot of the film, the duration of the aforementioned PTS is irrelevant.

#59 seawolfnyy

seawolfnyy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4763 posts
  • Location:La Rioja

Posted 01 October 2012 - 08:31 PM

I hope we get a full title song in the film as opposed to an abridged version like in QoS. A 145 min run time definitely suggests we could.

#60 x007AceOfSpades

x007AceOfSpades

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4369 posts
  • Location:Sunny Southern California

Posted 01 October 2012 - 08:35 PM

I hope we get a full title song in the film as opposed to an abridged version like in QoS. A 145 min run time definitely suggests we could.


I'm sure they'll cut it by a minute to not bore audiences. Not implying the song is boring, though I do have mixed feelings towards it.