
Golden Gun, Moonraker or View?
#31
Posted 08 August 2012 - 04:33 PM
#32
Posted 08 August 2012 - 08:20 PM
I find it hugely entertaining, and some of the stunts still look pretty good today.
Then AVTAK
Then TMWGG
but it's close
It does depend what you like. If you like more of a detective story where Bond is searching for the villain for at least half the film then TMWGG is for you. I think out of the three, TMWGG has a fairly serious tone for the first half or so, and Bonds character is particularly unsympathetic. Bond and Scaramanga are 2 shades off the same brush, and Bond doesn't like that comparison one bit. Not many gadgets, the humour is silly, but mainly at Goodnight and Pepper, in contrast Scaramanga is quite a menacing villain.
AVTAK is in the middle in terms of tone for me, there's some humour, not really any gadgets to speak of, but plenty of action and stunts, Moore is more charming than in TMWGG, and Bond is more a straight up hero. Stacy does detract a bit from the film for me. There's some scale and stunts, much more than TMWGG
MR is the antithesis of TMWGG, it's all scale and comedy and fun and a light fluffiness. Bond is a straight up hero for sure, no shades of grey, not much detective stuff(although a bit in France and Rio) Jaws, Locations, Beautiful girls, it's all chucked on the screen and is marvellous.
#33
Posted 09 August 2012 - 02:17 PM
I've always been a critic of MR - there's just too much mucking about for my taste. Jaws, his girlfriend, pigeons, Close Encounters references, all work to the film's detriment. If all that comes out, then left is an epic Bond that would've topped TSWLM and YOLT. But it refuses to take itself seriously and I think that undermines all that's good about it, including Drax, terrific special effects, the centrifuge scene, and Ken Adams at his over-the-top best.
So that leaves TMWTGG. I can look past Goodnight as village idiot, have no choice to pretend that Pepper is in fact part of a dream I'm having while I nap through that part of the movie, leaving me instead to focus on a pretty good performance by Sir Rog, a terrific villain, and a film still clinging to what's left of classic 60s EON.
TMWTGG it is then, by a whisker, but to speak up for all three, each one is followed by strong entry!
#34
Posted 09 August 2012 - 07:19 PM
The Man with the Golden Gun, Moonraker and A View to a Kill are generally the Roger Bonds which are criticized the most.
Which of the three do you prefer and which one did you like the least?
I was 13 when MOONRAKER was in the theaters. Coming right off the tides of TSWLM, It held my rapt attention for the entire summer. (the 1st OO7 film I'd seen was Golden Gun so that will ALWAYS hold a place in my heart.)
AVTAK was too much; too late. Although, the plot was the most sinister of Moore's adventures & Max Zorin the most interesting, if not twisted of villains, the movie falls short. The entire supporting cast (Stacey Sutton included) are merely flat & 2-dimentional. The action sequences, unto themselves, seem to take away from the piece rather than add to it. And, there are too many moments to mention where, it seems obvious (to the audience as well as the cast) that Roger Moore is quite wrung out. Every nuance is overplayed & every glib remark is over the top. I do believe he'd introduced himself as, "Bond, James Bond." more times in this one film than all his others combined.
#35
Posted 09 August 2012 - 09:29 PM
. I do believe he'd introduced himself as, "Bond, James Bond." more times in this one film than all his others combined.
Except when he introduced himself as "Stock, James Stock"!!!

#36
Posted 15 October 2012 - 02:07 PM
Next is TMWTGG - Not a favourite of mine, but it does have it's merits. Scaramanga is a great villain and I find his and bond's funhouse duel quite memorable. The plot is very slow-moving though.
MR is the weakest. It has some great scenes, such as the centrifugal scene, but unfortunately the whole film is ruined by the jaws love scenes, space, the laser guns, and the super race plot.
Edited by Jarvio, 15 October 2012 - 02:09 PM.
#37
Posted 15 October 2012 - 02:30 PM
AVTAK could have been a decent Bond movie, if it hadn't been for the over the top silliness,and the creaky, bored Roger Moore.
I HATE Moonraker. It rival DAD for the absolute nadir of the franchise.
#38
Posted 15 October 2012 - 03:01 PM
2. The Man with the Golden Gun
3. A View to a Kill
MOONRAKER has probably become my favourite Moore film, as I usually stop watching it about two-thirds of the way in before things get too daft. I find the start of the movie, particularly the scenes in Venice and Rio, very enjoyable indeed.
#39
Posted 15 October 2012 - 03:18 PM
I enjoyed this installment for the most part.
2. A View to a Kill
Thanks in large part to Mr. Walken.
3. The Man with the Golden Gun
Decent, I suppose. But found it less enjoyable than the other two efforts in question. I also say this even though the film includes a personal favorite Bond girl, Maud Adams.
#40
Posted 15 October 2012 - 03:45 PM
I very much enjoy A View to a Kill. It's not a great film by any stretch, but it's often a good deal of fun and features a great villainous duo in Zorin and May Day. I can enjoy Moonraker if I'm in the mood for it, which admitedly isn't all that often. The Man with the Golden Gun is just awful, aside from the funhouse sequences.
I agree with all of this. Of the three, AVTAK might be my favourite. Roger was definitely past his prime, but nevertheless the film has a credible plot, very relevant to the time and while the beats are too similar to Goldfinger, nothing really stretches the bounds of possibility. James Bond actually seems like a spy in it, geezerish and pun-laden though he may be. And I love Zorin and Pola Ivanova. Even Tanya Roberts gets a bad rap.
There's a bit of a nostalgia-factor with AVTAK for me (for whatever reason, I enjoyed it greatly when I'd see it on television, eventually spurring me on to buy the VHS which I watched to death as a kid), but I really can't see why everyone hates it so much other than its general feeling of tiredness and the lack of any truly iconic stunts (the Eiffel jump is pretty good, other than that you just have the decent-enough firetruck chase and the 'amputated-Renault' chase).
Somebody said that AVTAK looks like a TV movie and sadly that's absolutely accurate; the shots and most of the locations are all pretty formulaic and look like something from a considerably lower budget production than a Bond film (San Francisco in the 80s is almost synonymous with cheapness IMO) and this is probably the main reason why I don't think the inclusion of Timothy Dalton would have improved the film at all.
Moonraker and TMWTGG are actually overtly offensive in how excesses of humour and implausibility completely ruin otherwise perfect sequences (the car flip in Golden Gun and the otherwise AMAZING skydive fight in MR, my favourite Bond stunt ever). Moonraker has plenty of charm in it and it's perfectly watchable in its own kooky way, though.
Golden Gun has Christopher Lee, sure, but in almost every other way it's the closest thing a Bond film has ever come to truly being a bad, unwatchable piece of crap.
So yeah, AVTAK, MR and then waaaay down the very bottom, TMWTGG.
Edited by Gothamite, 15 October 2012 - 03:49 PM.
#41
Posted 15 October 2012 - 03:46 PM
#42
Posted 15 October 2012 - 03:49 PM
#43
Posted 15 October 2012 - 03:50 PM
Moonraker could have been better, too much humor, too much sci-fi, while still being a well made film
I've always preferred A View to a Kill . true Moore was old, but the humor was more controlled, Walken was a great villain and the plot at least not outer-space or 'everyone on earth must die!"
#44
Posted 15 October 2012 - 04:19 PM
Moonraker. It is like The Spy Who Loved Me all over again, which is not really bad at all. The whole relationship between Bond and Jaws is also furthered, i mean they are like arch nemeses at this point. This guy again?
Always had a problem with that. If you're going to put him in the 2nd movie, fine. Did anyone remind OO7 that punching JAWS in the face was futile? I wonder what JW Pepper might have to say about it.
Moonraker first, AVTAK a close second, and the last time I tried watching TMWTGG is was well-nigh unbearable.
Both Christphers (Lee & Walken, respectively) were Extraordinary villains. I've often wondered what impact they'd have if they were in films other than their own;
Say if Christopher Lee were cast as Stromberg or Christpher Walken were cast as Kamal Khan, maybe?
#45
Posted 15 October 2012 - 04:22 PM
#46
Posted 15 October 2012 - 05:59 PM
1. Moonraker
2. The Man with the Golden Gun
3. A View to a Kill
MOONRAKER has probably become my favourite Moore film, as I usually stop watching it about two-thirds of the way in before things get too daft. I find the start of the movie, particularly the scenes in Venice and Rio, very enjoyable indeed.
+1
The first half of MR is as strong as just about any other Bond pic, i'm always surprised that people rip on the humor/silliness of MR yet defend FYEO and it's embarrassing Blofeld/Parrot/Thatcher scenes....
#47
Posted 23 October 2012 - 04:41 PM
#48
Posted 23 October 2012 - 06:11 PM
AVTAK is my second least-liked film in the series (slightly edging out DAF). The only positive thing I can really say about the film is that Christopher Walken made a fantastic villain. The score is pretty questionable, Tanya Roberts couldn't be anymore dull/clueless, cheesy action sequences, and Moore just looks plain old (yes, older than in OP)
Moonraker is okay. The film has an interesting villain in Hugo Drax and I find Bond's time at his home fun. Jaws was a welcome addition too. The whole shooting laser guns while floating around in space is a little too ridiculous for me though. I found Lois Chiles character somewhat annoying as well.
LALD, FYEO, TSWLM, and even OP are much better entries for Roger Moore in my opinion.
#49
Posted 23 October 2012 - 06:37 PM
#50
Posted 23 October 2012 - 07:46 PM
2. MR
3. AVTAK
#51
Posted 23 October 2012 - 09:52 PM
AVTAK still lingers near the bottom, with only TWINE keeping it out of rock bottom. Walken's presence will always raise its profile for me.
#52
Posted 23 October 2012 - 11:49 PM
Not only is it my favourite of the three films you mention, it is one of my favourite Bond films altogether. It had a magnificent villain, a straightforward plot, a great performance by Moore, the beautiful Maud Adams, good music - and a midget!
TMWTGG is a totally superb Bond film.
Moonraker would be my least favourite of the ones you mention.
#53
Posted 26 October 2012 - 01:54 AM
Favorite: A View to a Kill (Probably my favorite Bond film overall)
Least favorite: Moonraker (I like it, just not as much as the other two.)
#54
Posted 26 October 2012 - 03:03 AM
#55
Posted 26 October 2012 - 03:16 AM
AVTAK is my least preferred out of the three.
#56
Posted 27 October 2012 - 05:27 PM
![[censored]](https://debrief.commanderbond.net/topic/61760-golden-gun-moonraker-or-view/style_emoticons/default/censored.gif)
A View to a Kill is my favourite; nowhere close to Moore's best, in fact it's quite a poorly put together film, but it's got Christopher Walken being nicely bonkers, Grace Jones and Patrick Macnee. I've always fancied the hell out of Tanya Roberts too, so that doesn't hurt!
#57
Posted 27 October 2012 - 05:29 PM
The Man with the Golden Gun, Moonraker and A View to a Kill are generally the Roger Bonds which are criticized the most.
Which of the three do you prefer and which one did you like the least?
I prefer "A VIEW TO A KILL" over the other three. Yes, it's like a remake of "GOLDFINGER". But something of an improvement.
My least favorite is "THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN". I just don't like it that much.
#58
Posted 08 November 2012 - 06:04 PM
MOONRAKER weirdly I liked it a lot better this time around than in previous viewings. Its a little over-the-top (okay maybe a lot) and I've never been entirely happy with Jaws' transition to hero (though I understand why they did it - I was one of those kids who loved Jaws as a villain in TSWLM) but it strikes all the right cords for me, if not enough to put it over as a particular fave.
THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN in someways is handicapped in my opinion simply because I think that with the cast and locations they could have done so much better - easily could have been one of the best. In particular I find the final "fight" - which primarily features Bond wandering around and a complete lack of Christopher Lee doing anything as terribly anti-climactic. At least Nick Nack gets a few hits in (although, really, losing your knife on the first bed bounce? Tsk-tsk). And while I like Maude Adams' part pretty well, I've never really warmed up to Britt Eklands role. I find the chase with Sherriff Pepper to be hard to watch and the comedy sound effects when Bond jumps the river is almost as bad as the California Girls bit in AVTAK. There's still stuff I like - for example Scaramanga and Bond's talk during the boxing match plays up the kind of mano-a-mano match that I as the viewer expect but TMWTGG never delivers.
#59
Posted 08 November 2012 - 06:17 PM
#60
Posted 08 November 2012 - 06:27 PM
