I don't think Bond himself would have named the mission (if there is one). That's more likely to have been a decision made by M or a senior operative at the time. I think Kincade probably just has a gun collection because he's an eccentric old collector.That is something I never though about, Bond naming the mission after his family estate but I don't understand why he would name it. Unless he was assigned to help create the mission because of his in the field expertise. But then why would Kincade have a gun collection at Bond manor?
Albert Finney's character
#31
Posted 25 April 2012 - 09:39 AM
#32
Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:05 AM
http://theforagingph...-skyfall-lodge/
#33
Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:10 AM
Makes perfect sense to me.If you see The Foraging Photographer's article "Grave News at Skyfall Lodge," one of the pictures is of a headstone memorial to a previous ghillie of the estate, Thomas Grenfell. The fact that this headstone even exists, and will possibly be seen on film, makes me think perhaps Kincade is the current ghillie to the estate, thus his love of antique firearms.
#34
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:59 PM
I think there's probably something to the 'surrogate father' thing we were mulling over before. But perhaps not quite in the way we were thinking. That of him being in a position of power. But rather one of Bond being 'raised by the servants'.
Kincade could be the person Bond was closest to during his formative years. Took him fishing, taught him how to use a gun, etc. So, Bond allowed him to stay on at the estate.
But there has to be more to it than that. Kincade must know something about Operation Skyfall.
#35
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:08 PM
#36
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:22 PM
But Kincade might not necessarily turn out to be on the side of good.
#37
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:35 PM
Yeah, something like that.
But Kincade might not necessarily turn out to be on the side of good.
I think he will be and turn out to be a real hero in this.
#38
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:52 PM
Kincade might have sold secret information to the Russians, or whoever, in the past, and this is why Operation Skyfall failed. Now he regrets it, and is on Bond's side.
Alternatively, he might have sold out completely and is working with Silva.
But, whichever way it goes, I do hope he has an heroic death (preferably saving Bond), if it comes to that.
#39
Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:05 PM
Making right past wrongs could be rather good too.
#40
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:42 AM
It should be said that I'm starting to wonder whether Kincade has any sort of diplomatic/intelligence history at all, or whether he's purely a former worker for the Bond family who James turns to when nowhere else is safe.
#41
Posted 01 May 2012 - 09:07 AM
I think you're spot on. I'm predicting that Kincade might become something of a fan favourite. Brave old gentleman who wants to do nothing more than serve and defend using his quirky gun collection. Excited to see Albert Finney with this sort of role.
It should be said that I'm starting to wonder whether Kincade has any sort of diplomatic/intelligence history at all, or whether he's purely a former worker for the Bond family who James turns to when nowhere else is safe.
This notion that ‘nowhere else is safe’ is a fascinating one, particularly in how the film makers will sell it to the audience.
Here we have M, the head of British intelligence, and her top licensed to kill secret agent. They are in London, at the heat of government, and there has been an attempt on Ms life. Bond whisks her away in her own company car, leaving her right hand man (Tanner) behind.
So far, so good, but now for the next bit...
No one would have imagined that his next course of action (the standard operational procedure, if you will) would be to drive her to Scotland in a 50 year old sports car and hide in a rundown manor house with only an old aged pensioner and his antique gun collection for back-up.
Something has bound to have happened that shows that nothing that he might have ordinarily done would be safe. And thinking about that, keeps taking me back to the Gareth Mallory character. I think he is bound to be a traitor with extensive influence and he has now been unmasked as far as Bond is concerned. Bond knows that Mallory knows every standard safe house, every standard emergency procedure and will be expecting Bond to use one of them.
Hence Bond ditches the company car for his own car, (no tracker device perhaps) and heads for Skyfall lodge and the one person he can trust.
#42
Posted 01 May 2012 - 12:54 PM
No one would have imagined that his next course of action (the standard operational procedure, if you will) would be to drive her to Scotland in a 50 year old sports car and hide in a rundown manor house with only an old aged pensioner and his antique gun collection for back-up.
...
Hence Bond ditches the company car for his own car, (no tracker device perhaps) and heads for Skyfall lodge and the one person he can trust.
Bond knows they're on their way, though.
"Some men are coming to kill us. We've got to kill them first."
So, one way or another, the villains must know where to find them.
#43
Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:12 PM
No one would have imagined that his next course of action (the standard operational procedure, if you will) would be to drive her to Scotland in a 50 year old sports car and hide in a rundown manor house with only an old aged pensioner and his antique gun collection for back-up.
...
Hence Bond ditches the company car for his own car, (no tracker device perhaps) and heads for Skyfall lodge and the one person he can trust.
Bond knows they're on their way, though.
"Some men are coming to kill us. We've got to kill them first."
So, one way or another, the villains must know where to find them.
Could it be that Bond heads to Skyfall to protect Kincade? If the lodge somehow factors into Silva's motivations and he's heading that way, maybe Bond is heading that way to protect Kincade/the lodge. M is with him because she has a connection to the lodge/Silva and wants to be there.
Just spitballing here...
#44
Posted 01 May 2012 - 02:02 PM
Kincade probably knows more than he should about the failed Operation Skyfall plot, if it originated there, as well. So, that might be another reason for Bond to go there and seek him out.
#45
Posted 01 May 2012 - 02:12 PM
#46
Posted 01 May 2012 - 03:54 PM
Either way, it's going to be great to see Albert Finney in this. Especially in his scenes with Judi Dench. I can imagine him getting a bit flirty with her. She might even call him "a sexist misogynist dinosaur."
But it would be good if there's a scene where they're all just sat around the fireplace eating porridge, or something, and talking things over. A proper character scene.
#47
Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:06 PM
#48
Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:26 PM
There seem to be about 25 scenes set at the Skyfall estate. Which would probably translate to around 30 minutes of screen time. So, he's likely to be in it for quite a lot of that time, I would have thought.
#49
Posted 08 May 2012 - 06:41 PM
#50
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:01 AM
Here's a thought.... What did James' father, Andrew, due for a living? As I remember (and a quick internet search), he was a representative for Vickers Armament, who produced the Vickers machine gun in early part of the 20th century.
So, old guns, eh?? Enter Kincade, a lover of old weaponry. Could he have ties with Andrew?
Yes, this is quite a strech of time to be combining. Just mulling.
#51
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:24 AM
Very nice thinking there. Even if only because of the "guns" connection. Although time is an issue indeed.Ha-ha, EON and production may be hush-hush, but if they are reading this, our speculations must be driving them either batty, or aching in pain from laughter.
Here's a thought.... What did James' father, Andrew, due for a living? As I remember (and a quick internet search), he was a representative for Vickers Armament, who produced the Vickers machine gun in early part of the 20th century.
So, old guns, eh?? Enter Kincade, a lover of old weaponry. Could he have ties with Andrew?
Yes, this is quite a strech of time to be combining. Just mulling.
#52
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:38 AM
#53
Posted 17 June 2012 - 11:58 PM
Also, some folks are saying the confrontation at Skyfall manor is the climax of the film, except doesn't that seem kind of anti-climactic? And also from the trailer it looks as though Skyfall is in flames and who I can only assume is Silva is walking away from the burning house because he thinks he's just killed Bond or he's lost track of him or whatever, which doesn't seem like an end point but more mid-story...?
#54
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:44 AM
But the Skyfall Lodge scene is where Bond and Silva have their final confrontation. Probably just after that shot in the trailer.
#55
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:54 AM
#56
Posted 18 June 2012 - 10:42 AM
That is indeed Silva walking away from the fire. Silva temporarily loses track of Bond, but then they resume battle near the burning lodge for their final showdown.Also, some folks are saying the confrontation at Skyfall manor is the climax of the film, except doesn't that seem kind of anti-climactic? And also from the trailer it looks as though Skyfall is in flames and who I can only assume is Silva is walking away from the burning house because he thinks he's just killed Bond or he's lost track of him or whatever, which doesn't seem like an end point but more mid-story...?
#57
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:43 PM
#58
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:51 PM
That is some awfully specific knowledge you have of that sequence, there...
It is, and Vauxhall is absolutely correct.
#59
Posted 18 June 2012 - 06:51 PM
#60
Posted 18 June 2012 - 07:19 PM
That is some awfully specific knowledge you have of that sequence, there...
It is, and Vauxhall is absolutely correct.
How do we know this?