#1711
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:18 AM
#1712
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:35 AM
#1713
Posted 05 February 2012 - 01:33 AM
Nicolas, didn´t know you spoke portuguese, but hey, spanish isn´t that diferent is it? Good show.
Back on track here, do you guys think we´ll get some new pics this week. It´s been a brilliant couple of days in what pictures are concerned.
#1714
Posted 05 February 2012 - 01:40 AM
#1715
Posted 05 February 2012 - 02:03 AM
I don't know about that - the bridge is 250m long, and the whole thing is closed for filming. Even without the extreme secrecy of the entire project (though I don't know why we got so many photos from Trinity Square), it would be very difficult to get close enough to take pictures.I imagine we'll get a few snaps of the Vauxhall Cross sequence when that's shot next weekend.
#1716
Posted 05 February 2012 - 02:08 AM
#1717
Posted 05 February 2012 - 02:38 AM
Depends on what that helicopter is being used for. Even if it's part of the scene (as opposed to being used for filming), its presence is going to be hard to pin down without a telephoto lens. And since it's very difficult to use a telephoto lens without being spotted, production will like move any paparazzo along.It'd also be difficult to hide a helicopter.
I'm just sick of people building their expectations up based on nothing, and then taking it out on forum members when those expectations (predictably) come to nothing. It's like whhen the "first official photo" was supposedly promised within a week (though I could never find anything from EON that suggested this was remotely true), and it wasn't released. Some people took it very poorly, and I think it's very unfair that other forum members - and though I include myself in that number, this is not just limited to myself - are subject to the tantrums of others. I haven't just seen it here, either, but on practically every Bond forum: people are convicing themselves that their hopes and expectations will be realised, only to be disappointed by it, and so ther natural reaction to it is to get upset over it when nothing was ever promised and so nothing ever came of it.Side note, you really need to stop shutting everybody down when they get excited my friend. I know you mean well but really, it's a bit harsh sometimes (this case above not included).
#1718
Posted 05 February 2012 - 03:00 AM
#1719
Posted 05 February 2012 - 03:19 AM
I can just see it now. Tightpants and other members arguing as we cue this music, then cutaway to a "Please stand by"
Edited by DominicGreene, 05 February 2012 - 03:22 AM.
#1720
Posted 05 February 2012 - 03:20 AM
#1721
Posted 05 February 2012 - 03:27 AM
Much obliged.
No problem, it had to be done. Now let's get back on topic! (See admins? I make a good moderator.)
Brilliant intervention Dom.
I take pride in my work.
#1722
Posted 05 February 2012 - 03:32 AM
On the subject...YES! Pictures! Cool! Want more! Will be expecting more! How fun! And so on and so on...
That would be nice.Clearly Bardem will have a special look of some sort, which is being kept secret. Sounds cool.
What a gorgeous Jag. jaguar007 must be one happy fan right now.
#1723
Posted 05 February 2012 - 03:33 AM
I think the 67CR intro should be mandatory as intervention from now on.
I second that motion.
#1724
Posted 05 February 2012 - 03:55 AM
I wonder ... I always assumed that the scenes that were shot on the first day of filming near Smithfield Markets came early in the film. But now that we've got this stuff being filmed at the same time as Craig running through the streets of London, I wonder if these are connected? I know Craig was wearing different clothes and had a beard during the stuff that was shot first, but I do believe a Jaguar was also present for those scenes - and as far as I know, it was never shot at the same time as the Range Rover.
#1725
Posted 05 February 2012 - 04:16 AM
Depends on what that helicopter is being used for. Even if it's part of the scene (as opposed to being used for filming), its presence is going to be hard to pin down without a telephoto lens. And since it's very difficult to use a telephoto lens without being spotted, production will like move any paparazzo along.
It'd also be difficult to hide a helicopter.I'm just sick of people building their expectations up based on nothing, and then taking it out on forum members when those expectations (predictably) come to nothing. It's like whhen the "first official photo" was supposedly promised within a week (though I could never find anything from EON that suggested this was remotely true), and it wasn't released. Some people took it very poorly, and I think it's very unfair that other forum members - and though I include myself in that number, this is not just limited to myself - are subject to the tantrums of others. I haven't just seen it here, either, but on practically every Bond forum: people are convicing themselves that their hopes and expectations will be realised, only to be disappointed by it, and so ther natural reaction to it is to get upset over it when nothing was ever promised and so nothing ever came of it.Side note, you really need to stop shutting everybody down when they get excited my friend. I know you mean well but really, it's a bit harsh sometimes (this case above not included).
You're not required to police it, though.
#1726
Posted 05 February 2012 - 04:22 AM
#1727
Posted 05 February 2012 - 07:16 AM
INTERVENTION 2: Please Stand By.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSEmKXzpQMQ&t=8s
I can just see it now. Tightpants and other members arguing as we cue this music, then cutaway to a "Please stand by"
I don't know what it is DominicGreene, but today I'm having a blast because because of you! Thank you so much!
#1728
Posted 05 February 2012 - 07:21 AM
#1729
Posted 05 February 2012 - 07:44 AM
#1730
Posted 05 February 2012 - 08:05 AM
I wonder ... I always assumed that the scenes that were shot on the first day of filming near Smithfield Markets came early in the film. But now that we've got this stuff being filmed at the same time as Craig running through the streets of London, I wonder if these are connected? I know Craig was wearing different clothes and had a beard during the stuff that was shot first, but I do believe a Jaguar was also present for those scenes - and as far as I know, it was never shot at the same time as the Range Rover.
#1731
Posted 05 February 2012 - 09:29 AM
I wonder ... I always assumed that the scenes that were shot on the first day of filming near Smithfield Markets came early in the film. But now that we've got this stuff being filmed at the same time as Craig running through the streets of London, I wonder if these are connected? I know Craig was wearing different clothes and had a beard during the stuff that was shot first, but I do believe a Jaguar was also present for those scenes - and as far as I know, it was never shot at the same time as the Range Rover.
The one is Scene 39 and the other is Scene 131, so no.
#1732
Posted 05 February 2012 - 09:32 AM
But are we sure of that? I don't recall seeing the Jag and the Range Rover being filmed together at the same time then.The one is Scene 39 and the other is Scene 131, so no.
#1733
Posted 05 February 2012 - 09:45 AM
I wonder ... I always assumed that the scenes that were shot on the first day of filming near Smithfield Markets came early in the film. But now that we've got this stuff being filmed at the same time as Craig running through the streets of London, I wonder if these are connected?
Range Rover and other cars drive into Smithfield Market's underground tunnel = Scene 39
Bond runs through streets filmed at Trinity House, eventually a Jag speeds off = Scene 131
Therefor, they are nowhere near each other in the film and the action is not connected.
#1734
Posted 05 February 2012 - 09:55 AM
#1735
Posted 05 February 2012 - 10:29 AM
What a gorgeous Jag. jaguar007 must be one happy fan right now.
Yes, but of course.
Marketto, what a great experience, I was just reading up on things.
Unfortunately my new job (as of the last 6 months) really limits my time on CBn and the internet as a whole.
Although I'm not around nearly as much as I used to be, I wish everyone well.
#1736
Posted 05 February 2012 - 01:34 PM
INTERVENTION 2: Please Stand By.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSEmKXzpQMQ&t=8s
I can just see it now. Tightpants and other members arguing as we cue this music, then cutaway to a "Please stand by"
I don't know what it is DominicGreene, but today I'm having a blast because because of you! Thank you so much!
Trying to make serious business entertaining
#1737
Posted 06 February 2012 - 12:41 AM
Bond with Tom Ford glasses? Is this scene supposed to take place in the summer?
#1738
Posted 06 February 2012 - 01:01 AM
I think it's more a case of Daniel Craig with Tom Ford glasses. I don't believe they're for the actual filming.http://www.movieweb....n-as-james-bond
Bond with Tom Ford glasses? Is this scene supposed to take place in the summer?
#1739
Posted 06 February 2012 - 01:08 AM
Yes, Germanlady can probably confirm this, I believe these are Dan´s shades. Would be a bit too top gun for James Bond if you ask me. I´d rather have the Persol sunglasses back, maybe a pair of 649.I think it's more a case of Daniel Craig with Tom Ford glasses. I don't believe they're for the actual filming.
http://www.movieweb....n-as-james-bond
Bond with Tom Ford glasses? Is this scene supposed to take place in the summer?
#1740
Posted 06 February 2012 - 03:03 AM
Amen! Bravo on the wonderful photos, Germanlady!Germanlady, thank you thank you thank you. You've made my Friday! I came home from work, thought "I'll check CBN but i doubt there'll be anything new..."
How wrong i was. Great pics, finally some good quality action shots and all hail the PPK!
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Skyfall, photo, beard
Film Eras →
General Bond Film Discussion →
The 007th Minute: a review seriesStarted by Jim , 17 Nov 2013 Skyfall |
|
||
Film Eras →
Daniel Craig (2006 - ) →
Skyfall (2012) →
SPOILERS: Skyfall (2012) →
Shades of You Only Live Twice in Skyfall?Started by Colombo , 08 Jan 2012 Bond 23, Skyfall |
|