Isn't the pre-title sequence in GOLDENEYE a flashback?
The film still progresses in a linear temporal order, it just omits so many years via the symbolism of the title sequence. Strictly speaking, it would only be a flashback if they were to establish the here-and-now, then flash back to something that had happened previously. A sequence outside the temporal order.
Lots of movies chop out years on end, (2001 being the most spectacular) but stick to a linear temporal order, the bits before the cuts are not considered flashback because they are not flashing back from anything.
Yeah, I'm thinking there won't be any flash backs - just possibly some past in the PTS.
Having said that... I'd find it rather odd if Fiennes was just a bit part in the PTS. Having a few little flash backs doesn't change that - not a lot of screen time.
Ergo - I'm just confused and looking forward to some more facts.